Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Codeship VS Phabricator

Compare Codeship VS Phabricator and see what are their differences

Hive
Seamless project management and collaboration for your team. featured
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

Codeship logo Codeship

Codeship is a fast and secure hosted Continuous Delivery platform that scales with your needs.

Phabricator logo Phabricator

Phacility - Phabricator
  • Codeship Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-19
  • Phabricator Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-10-13

Codeship features and specs

  • Ease of Use
    Codeship offers an intuitive interface that simplifies the setup process, making it accessible for developers who may not be experienced with continuous integration (CI) and continuous deployment (CD) tools.
  • Integration with Cloud Services
    Codeship integrates seamlessly with cloud services such as AWS, Google Cloud, and Heroku, facilitating easy deployment of applications.
  • Flexible Workflows
    The tool provides support for both Codeship Basic and Codeship Pro, allowing for flexibility in choosing between a more straightforward or a more customizable CI/CD workflow.
  • Docker Support
    Codeship Pro offers extensive support for Docker, allowing developers to use containerization strategies for their build and deployment processes.
  • Parallel Test Pipelines
    It supports parallel test pipelines, which can significantly speed up the testing process and reduce build times.
  • Slack Integration
    Codeship integrates with communication tools like Slack, enabling notifications and updates directly within team communication channels.

Possible disadvantages of Codeship

  • Cost
    Codeship can be more expensive compared to other CI/CD tools, particularly for larger teams or more complex projects that require more build resources.
  • Limited Customization
    For highly customized CI/CD processes, Codeship Basic might be limiting. Users may need to switch to Codeship Pro, which requires more configuration and a steeper learning curve.
  • Performance Bottlenecks
    Users have reported occasional performance bottlenecks, particularly under heavy workloads, which can slow down the CI/CD pipeline.
  • Plugin Ecosystem
    The plugin ecosystem for Codeship is not as extensive as some other CI/CD tools like Jenkins, potentially limiting its integration capabilities.
  • Learning Curve
    While Codeship Basic is relatively easy to use, Codeship Pro has a steeper learning curve, particularly for users who are new to Docker and advanced CI/CD practices.
  • Support
    Although support is available, some users have reported slower response times and less comprehensive support compared to other CI/CD platforms.

Phabricator features and specs

  • Comprehensive Toolset
    Phabricator offers a wide range of tools including code review, repository hosting, bug tracking, project management, and more, all integrated into one platform.
  • Customizability
    Users can customize workflows, forms, and other aspects to fit the specific needs of their projects.
  • Powerful Code Review
    Phabricator provides advanced code review features like inline comments, custom fields, and audit trails, making it a robust tool for maintaining code quality.
  • Open Source
    Being open-source, Phabricator allows organizations to host their instance, providing control over data and customizations without licensing fees.
  • Multi-repository Support
    It supports multiple version control systems (Git, Mercurial, and Subversion) and allows managing multiple repositories within the same project.

Possible disadvantages of Phabricator

  • Complex Setup
    Phabricator can be challenging to install and configure, requiring a good level of technical knowledge and infrastructure.
  • Steep Learning Curve
    New users might find it difficult to navigate and use all the features due to its extensive functionalities and less intuitive user interface.
  • Limited Third-Party Integrations
    Compared to other platforms, Phabricator has fewer integrations with third-party tools, which might be a limitation for some teams.
  • Dependency on Phacility's Future
    Phacility announced that they will cease operations, which means the future maintenance and updates of Phabricator could be uncertain.
  • Performance Issues
    For large-scale projects with many users and repositories, Phabricator may experience performance issues and could require significant resources to run smoothly.

Codeship videos

+ Add

LinuxFest Northwest 2017: Continuous Delivery to Microsoft Azure with Docker through Codeship

More videos:

  • Review - The Codeship -- Continuous Deployment made simple

Phabricator videos

+ Add

Phabricator code review session at Wikimedia Hackathon Zurich

More videos:

  • Review - Phabricator and Lando Brownbag July 2 2018
  • Review - Nizameddin Ordulu - Phabricator: An all-in-one tool for code review

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Codeship and Phabricator)

Codeship

Phabricator

Continuous Integration
100 100%
Continuous Integration
0% 0
Code Collaboration
0 0%
Code Collaboration
100% 100
DevOps Tools
100 100%
DevOps Tools
0% 0
Git
0 0%
Git
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Codeship and Phabricator. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Codeship and Phabricator

Codeship Reviews

The Best Alternatives to Jenkins for Developers
Codeship, a CI/CD platform based in the cloud, has an interface that is easy for users and it can integrate with numerous tools and services people are familiar with. It works well for different programming languages and platforms, which makes it suitable for many teams involved in development work.
Source: morninglif.com
Top 10 Most Popular Jenkins Alternatives for DevOps in 2024
CodeShip is a CloudBees SaaS platform that provides a managed CI/CD experience in the cloud. It’s designed to give control back to developers by providing a guided workflow for creating and maintaining CI/CD pipelines. This avoids much of the complexity that’s associated with Jenkins.
Source: spacelift.io
10 Jenkins Alternatives in 2021 for Developers
You could consider using CodeShip to help you to optimize CI/CD cloud deployment. CodeShip can be used by just about any type of development team that looks to increase the efficiency and automation of their code delivery. You can get started within minutes and gain access to an incredible amount of control when setting everything up. The customization options will seem...
Source: solutionsuggest.com
The Best Alternatives to Jenkins for Developers
CodeShip is a hosted continuous integration and continuous delivery platform found by CloudBees. It provides fast feedback and customized environments to build applications. It provides integration with almost anything and is good at helping you scale as per your needs. It comes free for up to 100 monthly builds.
Source: www.lambdatest.com

Phabricator Reviews

We have no reviews of Phabricator yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Phabricator seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 3 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Codeship mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Codeship yet. Tracking of Codeship recommendations started around Mar 2021.

Phabricator mentions (3)

  • Migrating from Phabricator to Azure Devops. Have some questions.
    My company has used Phabricator, which is an alternative to Azure Devops, for about 5 years. A few days ago they announced that the project won't be maintained anymore, so we are looking into alternatives. We have around 50 devs+product folks that use Phabricator at the moment. Source: almost 4 years ago
  • Is there any "Unified HUB SOlution" in this Microservices era?
    You also mention Gitlab is close to what you would like - maybe Phabricator is even closer: https://phacility.com/phabricator/. Source: about 4 years ago
  • Is there an alternative to open project with the next characteristics ?
    Https://phacility.com/phabricator/ I think checks most of those boxes, maybe all. Source: about 4 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Codeship and Phabricator, you can also consider the following products

Jenkins - Jenkins is an open-source continuous integration server with 300+ plugins to support all kinds of software development

GitLab - Create, review and deploy code together with GitLab open source git repo management software | GitLab

CircleCI - CircleCI gives web developers powerful Continuous Integration and Deployment with easy setup and maintenance.

GitHub - Originally founded as a project to simplify sharing code, GitHub has grown into an application used by over a million people to store over two million code repositories, making GitHub the largest code host in the world.

Travis CI - Simple, flexible, trustworthy CI/CD tools. Join hundreds of thousands who define tests and deployments in minutes, then scale up simply with parallel or multi-environment builds using Travis CI’s precision syntax—all with the developer in mind.

BitBucket - Bitbucket is a free code hosting site for Mercurial and Git. Manage your development with a hosted wiki, issue tracker and source code.

Loading...