Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

PetaSAN VS GlusterFS

Compare PetaSAN VS GlusterFS and see what are their differences

PetaSAN logo PetaSAN

PetaSAN is an open source Scale-Out SAN solution offering massive scalability and performance.

GlusterFS logo GlusterFS

GlusterFS is a scale-out network-attached storage file system.
  • PetaSAN Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-07-02
  • GlusterFS Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-03-10

PetaSAN features and specs

  • Scalability
    PetaSAN is designed to be highly scalable, allowing users to easily expand their storage capacity by adding more nodes to the system.
  • Open Source
    As an open-source solution, PetaSAN allows for transparency, community-driven development, and flexibility to modify the system as needed.
  • High Availability
    The system is built to provide high availability with built-in redundancy features, ensuring minimal downtime and data accessibility.
  • Cost-Effective
    Being an open-source solution, PetaSAN can be more cost-effective compared to proprietary storage systems, reducing software acquisition costs.
  • Flexibility
    PetaSAN supports a wide range of hardware, which provides users with the flexibility to choose and integrate various components based on their needs.

Possible disadvantages of PetaSAN

  • Complex Setup
    Setting up and configuring PetaSAN can be complex and time-consuming, requiring significant technical knowledge and experience with storage systems.
  • Community Support
    While PetaSAN is open source, it relies on community support for troubleshooting and updates, which can sometimes lead to slower support response times.
  • Learning Curve
    Users may face a steep learning curve, especially if they are not familiar with open-source storage solutions, requiring more time to become proficient with the system.
  • Limited Features
    Compared to some commercial storage solutions, PetaSAN may have fewer advanced features and capabilities, potentially limiting its functionality for certain use cases.

GlusterFS features and specs

  • Scalability
    GlusterFS can easily scale out by adding more servers to the cluster, allowing it to handle increasing amounts of data and traffic.
  • Distributed File System
    It provides a distributed file system, enabling data replication and distribution across multiple nodes, which enhances data availability and reliability.
  • Open Source
    Being open source, GlusterFS provides flexibility and freedom for customization to fit specific needs without the cost associated with proprietary solutions.
  • POSIX Compliance
    GlusterFS is POSIX-compliant, meaning it supports standard file system operations, which makes it easier to integrate with existing applications and systems.
  • High Availability
    With built-in features like self-healing and replication, GlusterFS ensures that data remains available and consistent even in the event of hardware failures.
  • Geographical Distribution
    It supports geographical distribution of data, which is beneficial for disaster recovery and accessing data from multiple locations.

Possible disadvantages of GlusterFS

  • Performance Overhead
    Due to its distributed nature, GlusterFS might introduce performance overhead, particularly for workloads requiring low-latency or high-throughput.
  • Complexity in Management
    Managing a GlusterFS cluster can be complex, requiring in-depth knowledge of the system to properly configure and troubleshoot issues.
  • Latency Issues
    Latency can become a significant issue, especially in write-heavy applications or when nodes are geographically distant.
  • Resource Intensive
    GlusterFS can be resource-intensive, requiring significant CPU and memory resources to manage its distributed architecture and ensure data consistency.
  • Lack of Advanced Features
    Compared to other distributed file systems, GlusterFS may lack some advanced features like native support for certain storage protocols or comprehensive storage tiering.
  • Community Support
    While there is a community around GlusterFS, the level and speed of community support may not match that of commercially-backed solutions.

PetaSAN videos

Review Banyak Petasan

More videos:

  • Review - Review 3# Petasan, Bikin Mobil Rocket Pake Petasan Part-1
  • Review - REVIEW R1-M KNALPOT NEMBAK NEMBAK KAYA PETASAN! CANGGIH BGT NIH MOTOR GAIZ! #r1m #motovlog

GlusterFS videos

An Overview of GlusterFS Architecture Part 2 - Non-replicated Cluster

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to PetaSAN and GlusterFS)
Cloud Computing
45 45%
55% 55
Cloud Storage
41 41%
59% 59
Storage
35 35%
65% 65
Backup & Sync
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using PetaSAN and GlusterFS. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare PetaSAN and GlusterFS

PetaSAN Reviews

9 Of The Best FreeNAS Alternatives For Your Storage Needs
We have PetaSAN which is a fantastic FreeNAS alternatives app. This is an open-source Scale-Out SAN process that is highly reliable. It makes use of the best cloud processes to enable clients to have immense flexibility.
15 FreeNAS Alternatives 2020 | Best Storage Operating System
PetaSAN is a Ceph-based iSCSI cluster, open-source FreeNAS alternative, known widely for its end-to-end integrated solution and scale-out SAN arrangement that offers impressive adaptability and execution. Its latest cloud storage technology makes it corporate-efficient to manage large data storage in one unit; run on the Linux operating system, the program has many nodes...
15 Best FreeNas alternatives in 2020
The next on the list is one of the best FreeNas alternative for storing large data, PetaSAN. It is open-source software which has the latest technology of cloud storage which makes it easy for corporates and enterprises to save their necessary files, data,and folders in one unit. There are many nodes which are joined for a better performance of this software. It runs on...
10 Best FreeNas alternatives in 2020
PetaSAN is an open-source Scale-Out SAN arrangement offering enormous adaptability and execution. PetaSAN utilizes current cloud-based innovations to give the flexibility and ability to scale up the capacity group basically by including more hubs; this should be possible whenever and in a genuinely non-troublesome way. PetaSAN is planned from the beginning to do a specific...
Source: omy9.com

GlusterFS Reviews

We have no reviews of GlusterFS yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, GlusterFS seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 2 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

PetaSAN mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of PetaSAN yet. Tracking of PetaSAN recommendations started around Mar 2021.

GlusterFS mentions (2)

  • [D] What are the compute options you've considered for your projects?
    I am a fan of Gearman to schedule and dispatch distributed jobs, Redis as a collaborative blackboard, and GlusterFS to share models across multiple systems and make bulk data available across the entire system (usually referenced in the blackboard as a pathname). Source: about 2 years ago
  • Gluster vs Oracle Gluster
    If you're not relying on support, then I would probably standardize on the latest packages available from gluster.org. Source: almost 4 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing PetaSAN and GlusterFS, you can also consider the following products

TrueNAS Core - TrueNAS Core (formerly FreeNAS) is a storage operating system strong and robust enough to meet the needs of enterprise level businesses.

Ceph - Ceph is a distributed object store and file system designed to provide excellent performance...

XigmaNAS - File Sharing, OS & Utilities, and Security & Privacy

rkt - App Container runtime

Amahi - Amahi is a media, home and app server software known for its easy-to-use user interface. Amahi has the best media, backup and web apps for small networks.

Apache Karaf - Apache Karaf is a lightweight, modern and polymorphic container powered by OSGi.