Pedestal VS Fresh Framework

I started playing with pedestal to create Clojure micro services. Coming from the Nodejs world, and Clojure being a REPL driven development language, I naturally expected to have watch for code changes and reload without having to restart the server. I searched around and found solutions, but I couldn't get it to work trivially. This guide is meant to serve as a step-by-step guide to achieve this. - Source: dev.to / about 2 years ago

Also http://pedestal.io/ is a good alternative with async middleware support out of the box. I tried both (for pet projects) and liked pedestal more. Source: over 2 years ago

Deno: Deno with one of it's frameworks (like Fresh. - Source: dev.to / about 1 month ago

Because I have secret magical powers that you probably don't, it's basically free for me. Here's the breakdown though: The application server uses Deno and Fresh (https://fresh.deno.dev) and requires a shared-1x CPU at 512 MB of ram. That's $3.19 per month as-is. It also uses 2GB of disk volume, which would cost $0.30 per month. As far as post generation goes: when I first set it up it used GPT-3.5 Turbo to... - Source: Hacker News / 3 months ago

Deno has also created a Next.js competitor, Fresh. I found it a few weeks ago and am starting to go through the docs, looks like a good overall concept. https://fresh.deno.dev/. - Source: Hacker News / 3 months ago

Https://fresh.deno.dev/ - Fresh embraces the tried and true design of server side rendering and progressive enhancement on the client side. Source: 5 months ago

Along the way, I not only got the oppurtunity to revise old concepts that had blurred in my memory, but also learnt about new technologies like Fresh.js, a framework from Deno (a js runtime engine) that uses Preact, a React Routing library and used Chakra UI for the first time. - Source: dev.to / 7 months ago