Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

pdflayer VS Materialize CSS

Compare pdflayer VS Materialize CSS and see what are their differences

DocRaptor
As the only API powered by the Prince HTML-to-PDF engine, DocRaptor provides the best support for complex PDFs with powerful support for headers, page breaks, page numbers, flexbox, watermarks, accessible PDFs, and much more featured
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

pdflayer logo pdflayer

Free, powerful HTML to PDF API supporting both URL and raw HTML conversion. Unlimited document size, lightning-fast and compatible PHP, Python, Ruby, etc.

Materialize CSS logo Materialize CSS

A modern responsive front-end framework based on Material Design
  • pdflayer Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-04-23
  • Materialize CSS Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-10-14

pdflayer features and specs

  • Ease of Use
    pdflayer offers a simple and user-friendly API, making it easy for developers to integrate PDF generation into their applications.
  • High-Quality PDFs
    The service is capable of generating high-quality PDFs that maintain the integrity of the original content.
  • Customizable
    pdflayer provides a range of customization options, including custom headers, footers, and watermarking.
  • Multiple Formats
    It supports HTML to PDF conversion, which is useful for applications that need to convert web content into PDF documents.
  • Free Tier
    Offers a free plan with a limited number of conversions, which is great for small projects or initial testing.
  • Security
    pdflayer uses HTTPS encryption to ensure the security of your data during transfer.

Possible disadvantages of pdflayer

  • Cost
    While there is a free tier, the more advanced features and higher usage plans can become relatively expensive.
  • Learning Curve for Customization
    Although the basic features are easy to use, customizing the output PDFs to a high degree may require a bit of a learning curve.
  • Rate Limits
    The free tier and lower-cost plans have rate limits, which might not be sufficient for high-volume applications.
  • Limited Offline Capabilities
    As a cloud service, pdflayer requires internet connectivity for PDF generation, which might not be suitable for offline-first applications.
  • Dependency on External Service
    Relying on an external service means that any downtime or issues with pdflayer's servers can directly affect your application's ability to generate PDFs.
  • Feature Limitations
    Compared to other, more mature PDF libraries, pdflayer might lack some advanced features that power users may require.

Materialize CSS features and specs

  • Responsive Design
    Materialize CSS provides a responsive grid system, making it easier to create layouts that work well on various screen sizes and devices.
  • Material Design
    Adheres to Google's Material Design principles, offering a modern and professional look that is consistent across web applications.
  • Component Variety
    Offers a wide range of pre-built components, including forms, buttons, cards, and navigation bars, which helps speed up development.
  • Customization
    Provides options to customize components using Sass, making it flexible for specific design needs.
  • Built-in JavaScript
    Includes built-in JavaScript components like modals, carousels, and tabs, which enhance functionality without requiring additional libraries.

Possible disadvantages of Materialize CSS

  • Learning Curve
    Although it follows Material Design guidelines, there is a learning curve associated with understanding and implementing its various components and classes.
  • File Size
    Including the full library can make your project heavier, affecting load times, especially for users on slower connections.
  • Customization Complexity
    While customizable, deeply customizing or overriding default styles can sometimes be complicated and time-consuming.
  • Dependency on jQuery
    Some components still rely on jQuery, adding to the library size and potentially conflicting with modern JavaScript practices.
  • Community Support
    Compared to larger frameworks like Bootstrap, Materialize CSS has a smaller community, which can result in fewer third-party resources and plugins.

pdflayer videos

No pdflayer videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Materialize CSS videos

+ Add

Build A Travel Agency Theme With Materialize CSS 1.0.0

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to pdflayer and Materialize CSS)

pdflayer

Materialize CSS

PDF Tools
100 100%
PDF Tools
0% 0
Design Tools
0 0%
Design Tools
100% 100
HTML To PDF
100 100%
HTML To PDF
0% 0
Developer Tools
0 0%
Developer Tools
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using pdflayer and Materialize CSS. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare pdflayer and Materialize CSS

pdflayer Reviews

We have no reviews of pdflayer yet.
Be the first one to post

Materialize CSS Reviews

15 Top Bootstrap Alternatives For Frontend Developers in 2024
Material Design is a design language that combines classic principles of successful design with innovation and technology. One of the downsides of Materialize is that it does not support older versions of web browsers, and sometimes it does not handle certain nestings of components properly, resulting in an odd appearance.
Source: coursesity.com
9 Best Bootstrap Alternatives | Best Frontend Frameworks [2024]
Materialize is a modern responsive front-end framework based on the Material Design principles of Google. Material design is a design language created by Google, which combines traditional design methods with innovations and technology.
Source: hackr.io
Top 10 Best CSS Frameworks for Front-End Developers in 2022
Created by Google in 2014, Materialize is a responsive UI framework for websites and Android apps. It provides many ready-to-use components, classes, and starter templates. It is compatible with Sass and has a responsive layout based on Bootstrap’s 12-column grid format. The best part? Its extensive color palettes. So, if you want to work with Material Design (Google’s...
Source: hackr.io
15 Best CSS Frameworks: Professional Bootstrap and Foundation Alternatives
It’s specifically designed to help you develop faster using a standard template and customizable components. As the name suggests, Materialize is based on the basic principles of Material Design.
Source: www.webdesignerdepot.com
10 of the Best Bootstrap Alternatives
Materialize is a Design-inspired front-end framework that offers everything you need to create beautiful websites and apps. It includes a responsive grid system, CSS components, and animation libraries. Materialize is also easy to use and customizable, making it the perfect choice for any project. Furthermore, a single basic responsive framework across all phases minimizes...
Source: thetechhacker.com

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Materialize CSS seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 26 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

pdflayer mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of pdflayer yet. Tracking of pdflayer recommendations started around Mar 2021.

Materialize CSS mentions (26)

  • Top 5 Best CSS Frameworks for Responsive Web Design in 2024
    Materialize is a modern CSS framework based on Google’s Material Design. It was created and designed by Google to provide a unified and consistent user interface across all its products. Materialize is focused on user experience as it integrates animations and components to provide feedback to users. - Source: dev.to / 8 months ago
  • Front-end Framework: Comparing Bootstrap, Foundation and Materialize
    Materialize was created by a team of developers at Google, inspired by the principles of Material Design. Material Design is a design language developed by Google that emphasizes tactile surfaces, realistic lighting, and bold, graphic interfaces. Materialize aims to bring these principles to web development by providing a framework with ready-to-use components and styles based on Material Design. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
  • Took a web development job without much experience, am I doomed?
    If you wanna make it look nice use materialize css works great with Django templates. Source: about 2 years ago
  • Best 3 Bootstrap Alternatives
    You can also visit the Materialize website and GitHub repository which currently has garnered over 38k likes and has been forked over 4k times by developers. - Source: dev.to / about 2 years ago
  • All About Hacktober Fest 2022 You Need To Know
    This repository consists of files required to deploy a Web App or PWA created with Materialize Css. - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing pdflayer and Materialize CSS, you can also consider the following products

PDFShift - Convert any HTML documents to high-fidelity PDF using a single POST request

Bootstrap - Simple and flexible HTML, CSS, and JS for popular UI components and interactions

PDFCrowd - Pdfcrowd is a Web/HTML to PDF online service. Convert HTML to PDF online in the browser or in your PHP, Python, Ruby, .NET, Java apps via the REST API.

Tailwind CSS - A utility-first CSS framework for rapidly building custom user interfaces.

DocRaptor - As the only API powered by the Prince HTML-to-PDF engine, DocRaptor provides the best support for complex PDFs with powerful support for headers, page breaks, page numbers, flexbox, watermarks, accessible PDFs, and much more

Foundation - The most advanced responsive front-end framework in the world

Loading...