Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

PCem VS PHPCodeChecker

Compare PCem VS PHPCodeChecker and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

PCem logo PCem

PCem emulates an IBM 5150 PC, several models of clones and successors, along with various graphics...

PHPCodeChecker logo PHPCodeChecker

PHPCodeChecker is a best-in-class service that enables developers and PHP programmers to write their code online and analyze it.
  • PCem Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-05-06
  • PHPCodeChecker Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-30

PCem features and specs

  • High Compatibility
    PCem is known for its high compatibility with a wide range of older PC systems, allowing users to emulate various hardware configurations from the '80s and '90s.
  • Wide OS Support
    PCem supports a variety of operating systems, allowing users to run DOS, Windows 95, 98, and many other legacy systems.
  • Authentic Experience
    By emulating the hardware at a low level, PCem provides an experience that is very close to using an actual vintage PC.
  • Customization
    Users have extensive control over the configuration of the emulated machine, including CPU type, amount of RAM, and various peripherals.

Possible disadvantages of PCem

  • Complex Setup
    Setting up PCem can be complex, especially for users not familiar with configuring legacy PC hardware and software.
  • Resource Intensive
    PCem can be resource-intensive compared to other emulators, requiring a relatively powerful modern PC to run smoothly.
  • Limited Graphics Support
    While it supports many early graphics cards, PCem lacks support for more advanced graphics emulation beyond older Voodoo models.
  • Requires BIOS
    PCem requires the user to provide their own BIOS files for the emulated systems, which can be difficult to legally obtain.

PHPCodeChecker features and specs

  • Accessibility
    PHPCodeChecker is an online tool, making it easily accessible from any device with an internet connection without needing to install any software.
  • Ease of Use
    The interface is straightforward, allowing users to quickly paste their PHP code and check for errors without navigating through complex settings.
  • Free to Use
    The tool is available for free, which is beneficial for individual developers or small teams with limited budgets.
  • Immediate Feedback
    It provides instant feedback on the code, helping developers quickly identify and correct syntax errors or warnings.

Possible disadvantages of PHPCodeChecker

  • Limited Scope
    PHPCodeChecker primarily focuses on syntax checking and may not detect more complex logical errors or security vulnerabilities in the code.
  • Dependence on Internet
    Being an online tool, it requires an internet connection to function, which might be a limitation in environments with restricted or no internet access.
  • On-Premise Limitation
    For organizations that require on-premise solutions due to security policies, using an online tool like PHPCodeChecker may not be feasible.
  • No Customization
    The tool does not offer customization options to suit specific coding standards or preferences which some development teams might require.

PCem videos

Installation and Review of Windows NT 3.1 Build 297 (PCem)

More videos:

  • Review - Emulating Windows 98 (D3D, 3Dfx) on PCEM running 3DMark'99 Full Speed On A Windows 10 PC
  • Demo - Blood II PC Gamer Demo (PCEM Test)

PHPCodeChecker videos

No PHPCodeChecker videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to PCem and PHPCodeChecker)
IDE
100 100%
0% 0
Development
0 0%
100% 100
Text Editors
100 100%
0% 0
Developer Tools
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using PCem and PHPCodeChecker. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, PCem seems to be a lot more popular than PHPCodeChecker. While we know about 34 links to PCem, we've tracked only 3 mentions of PHPCodeChecker. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

PCem mentions (34)

  • Popularity of DOS/4GW made Win95 game compat easier, but with higher stakes
    Absolutely check out PCem for a closer to hardware emulation than dosbox, https://pcem-emulator.co.uk/. - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago
  • Anyone get Sid Meier's SimGolf Working?
    One option is to try PCEm https://pcem-emulator.co.uk/ which is a emulator for old computers that runs on Windows and Linux, I actually learned about it via this video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y9HP9W88Wew of a guy playing Sim Golf on his Windows PC using PCEm, this should be similar on Linux but I'm not sure if the SteamDeck will have enough power but maybe worth a try. Source: almost 2 years ago
  • Is there anyway to port old abandonware Windows 95/98 game to Apple Silicon?
    For hardcore mode, compile PCEm - I think brew has most of the dependencies available ... https://pcem-emulator.co.uk/ - have fun! Source: almost 2 years ago
  • Is VirtualBox still really bad with Windows 9x?
    You use 86box or PCem which are not virtualizers but hardware emulators so you will need a really fast CPU (especially in single thread). The advantage is that Windows 98 will be running on period appropriate hardware, since all of it is being emulated real-time. Source: about 2 years ago
  • Intel Explores Transition to 64-Bit-Only X86S Architecture
    QEMU [0] emulates many systems, including the 32-bit Intel architecture. For retro gaming specifically I can recommend PCem [1], which also emulates a wide range of sound and graphics cards, from IBM MDA to 3dfx Voodoo 2. [0] https://www.qemu.org/ [1] https://pcem-emulator.co.uk/. - Source: Hacker News / about 2 years ago
View more

PHPCodeChecker mentions (3)

  • Difference in "for" statement syntax between PHP 5 / 7 / 8?
    Agreed -- but one of my original observations was how the syntax checker at https://phpcodechecker.com/ did not flag the "illegal" spaces if PHP 5.6 was selected, but did flag them if 7.4 or 8.1 is selected. This prompted my original question whether something changed from v5 to v7 in terms of white-space interpretation. Source: over 2 years ago
  • HERE's a list of free platforms you need for your next project!
    Https://phpcodechecker.com/ // reports errors in your code. Source: about 3 years ago
  • Could y’all help me troubleshoot the missing thing from this file?
    I used this website: https://phpcodechecker.com/. Source: about 3 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing PCem and PHPCodeChecker, you can also consider the following products

NASM - The Netwide Assembler, NASM, is an 80x86 and x86-64 assembler designed for portability and...

PHPTester.net - PHPTester.net gives developers and learners the ability to write their PHP code and get the output online.

86Box - 86Box is a hypervisor and IBM PC system emulator that specializes in running old operating systems...

WritePHPOnline.Com - WritePHPOnline.Com is an online site that enables you to write code in PHP and view its output.

flat assembler - A fast and efficient self-assembling x86 assembler for DOS, Windows and Linux.

Paiza.io - Paiza.io allows you to write and run code in many languages.