Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

PC-lint VS Clang Static Analyzer

Compare PC-lint VS Clang Static Analyzer and see what are their differences

PC-lint logo PC-lint

PC-lint Plus is the premier static analysis tool for C and C++

Clang Static Analyzer logo Clang Static Analyzer

The Clang Static Analyzer is a source code analysis tool that finds bugs in C, C++, and Objective-C...
  • PC-lint Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-11
  • Clang Static Analyzer Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-07-28

PC-lint features and specs

  • Comprehensive Analysis
    PC-lint provides an exhaustive static code analysis, covering a wide range of potential errors, coding standard violations, and performance issues.
  • Customizability
    The tool can be highly customized to fit specific coding standards and project requirements, allowing users to configure checks and reports extensively.
  • Early Error Detection
    By catching errors early in the development cycle, PC-lint helps reduce debugging time and improves code quality before runtime.
  • Wide Language Support
    PC-lint supports a variety of C and C++ standards, making it versatile for projects using different variations of these languages.
  • Detailed Feedback
    The tool provides detailed messages and suggestions for detected issues, helping developers understand and resolve problems efficiently.

Possible disadvantages of PC-lint

  • Complex Configuration
    Setting up PC-lint properly requires a deep understanding of both the tool and the project's code base, which can be complex and time-consuming.
  • Steep Learning Curve
    Due to its comprehensive capabilities, new users may find it challenging to learn and effectively use the tool without considerable effort.
  • Cost
    PC-lint is a paid tool, which might be a drawback for individual developers or small teams with limited budgets.
  • Outdated Interface
    The user interface of PC-lint is considered outdated compared to more modern static analysis tools, potentially affecting usability and user experience.
  • Limited Integration
    PC-lint offers fewer integrations with modern development environments and continuous integration tools compared to some other static analyzers.

Clang Static Analyzer features and specs

  • Integration with Clang
    The Clang Static Analyzer is built as part of the Clang project, ensuring seamless integration with the Clang compiler. This allows for easy adoption in projects that already use Clang for compiling, as there is no need for additional tooling setup.
  • Open Source
    Being an open-source tool, Clang Static Analyzer is freely available for anyone to use and modify. This encourages a community-driven approach to improvements and provides the flexibility to tailor the tool to specific needs.
  • Path-sensitive Analysis
    Clang Static Analyzer performs path-sensitive analysis, which means it evaluates different execution paths in the code to detect complex bugs that may only manifest under certain conditions.
  • Deep C/C++ Support
    As part of the LLVM project, Clang Static Analyzer offers robust support for C and C++ languages, leveraging the deep language understanding from the Clang front-end.

Possible disadvantages of Clang Static Analyzer

  • Limited Language Support
    While it is excellent for C and C++, Clang Static Analyzer has limited support for other programming languages, which can be a drawback for projects involving multiple languages.
  • False Positives
    Like many static analysis tools, Clang Static Analyzer can generate false positives, where it reports issues that are not actual bugs. This can require developers to spend additional time reviewing and dismissing spurious warnings.
  • Complex Setup for Non-Clang Projects
    Projects that are not already using Clang might face a more complex setup process to integrate Clang Static Analyzer, as it requires adapting build configurations to use Clang.
  • Performance Overhead
    Running Clang Static Analyzer can introduce significant performance overhead during the analysis phase, which might lead to longer build or integration times, especially for large codebases.

PC-lint videos

Using PC-Lint for MISRA and static code analysis

Clang Static Analyzer videos

2019 LLVM Developers’ Meeting: A. Dergachev “Developing the Clang Static Analyzer”

More videos:

  • Review - Clang Static Analyzer - Eduard Bachmakov, Linux Foundation (GSoC)

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to PC-lint and Clang Static Analyzer)
Code Analysis
29 29%
71% 71
Code Coverage
35 35%
65% 65
Code Review
38 38%
62% 62
Development
17 17%
83% 83

User comments

Share your experience with using PC-lint and Clang Static Analyzer. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Clang Static Analyzer seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 7 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

PC-lint mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of PC-lint yet. Tracking of PC-lint recommendations started around Mar 2021.

Clang Static Analyzer mentions (7)

  • Improvements to static analysis in GCC 14
    Clang has a similar tool, the Clang Static Analyzer: https://clang-analyzer.llvm.org/. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
  • Memory Safe or Bust?
    Continuous Integration and Continuous Deployment [CI/CD] pipelines play a crucial role in enforcing code quality, especially when working with memory-unsafe languages. By integrating automated dynamic analysis tools like Valgrind or AddressSanitizer, static analysis tools like Clang Static Analyzer or cppcheck, and manual code review processes, developers can identify and mitigate many memory-related... - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
  • Static Code analysis
    No one static analyzer catches everything. It's best to run multiple. Popular ones are cppcheck, clang-analyzer, GCC static analyzer in GCC 10+, flawfinder, lizard. Source: about 2 years ago
  • Checked C
    With "cross translation units" (CTU) analysis a static analyzer could derive a constraint on `some_function` return value and check this against the array size to detect a possible bug. The Clang static analyzer [1], used through CodeChecker (CC) [2], do support CTU (enabled with `--ctu`). I'm very happy with the result on the code I'm working on. Of course this is not magic, and it's important to understand the... - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago
  • What's in your tool belt?
    Cppcheck and Clang Analyzer: statically analyze your code to find bad style and bugs (undefined behavior) respectively. Clang Analyzer can actually be frighteningly clever and has a low false positive rate (unlike most other non-commercial static checkers). Source: almost 3 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing PC-lint and Clang Static Analyzer, you can also consider the following products

SonarQube - SonarQube, a core component of the Sonar solution, is an open source, self-managed tool that systematically helps developers and organizations deliver Clean Code.

Cppcheck - Cppcheck is an analysis tool for C/C++ code. It detects the types of bugs that the compilers normally fail to detect. The goal is no false positives. CppCheckDownload cppcheck for free.

Coverity Scan - Find and fix defects in your Java, C/C++ or C# open source project for free

Polyspace - Polyspace is a suite of static code analysis products developed by Matlab to help software developers, QA Testers, and engineers find critical problems in their code and fix them before they become a serious threat.

Parasoft C/C++test - Ensure compliance with a variety of functional safety, security, and coding standards in embedded C/C++ software.

lgtm.com - lgtm.com is a platform for code analytics.