Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Parasoft C/C++test VS PC-lint

Compare Parasoft C/C++test VS PC-lint and see what are their differences

Parasoft C/C++test logo Parasoft C/C++test

Ensure compliance with a variety of functional safety, security, and coding standards in embedded C/C++ software.

PC-lint logo PC-lint

PC-lint Plus is the premier static analysis tool for C and C++
  • Parasoft C/C++test Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-11
  • PC-lint Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-11

Parasoft C/C++test features and specs

  • Comprehensive Analysis
    Parasoft C/C++test offers a wide array of testing and analysis tools, including static code analysis, unit testing, and coverage analysis, providing a robust environment for identifying and fixing issues early in the development process.
  • Automated Testing
    It supports automated testing, which helps in consistent execution of tests and allows developers to integrate testing into their continuous integration pipelines seamlessly.
  • Compliance with Standards
    The tool supports compliance with industry standards such as MISRA, CERT, and AUTOSAR, making it suitable for projects that require adherence to specific coding guidelines.
  • Integration with Development Environments
    Parasoft C/C++test easily integrates with popular development environments and build systems, enhancing the workflow without requiring major changes to existing processes.
  • Detailed Reporting
    The tool provides detailed reports and dashboards that offer insights into code quality, test coverage, and compliance, aiding in better decision making and prioritization.

Possible disadvantages of Parasoft C/C++test

  • Complexity
    Due to its comprehensive features, the tool can be complex to set up and configure, especially for teams that are new to using such an extensive testing suite.
  • Cost
    Parasoft C/C++test can be expensive, which may be a barrier for smaller teams or startups with limited budgets looking for cost-effective solutions.
  • Steep Learning Curve
    New users might find that there is a steep learning curve due to the tool's extensive functionality and features, requiring time and resources for training.
  • Performance Overhead
    When performing comprehensive analysis and testing, the tool might introduce performance overhead, potentially slowing down the development pipeline.
  • Customization Limitations
    While the tool provides extensive functionalities, some users might find it lacks customization options for specific use cases or integrated workflows.

PC-lint features and specs

  • Comprehensive Analysis
    PC-lint provides an exhaustive static code analysis, covering a wide range of potential errors, coding standard violations, and performance issues.
  • Customizability
    The tool can be highly customized to fit specific coding standards and project requirements, allowing users to configure checks and reports extensively.
  • Early Error Detection
    By catching errors early in the development cycle, PC-lint helps reduce debugging time and improves code quality before runtime.
  • Wide Language Support
    PC-lint supports a variety of C and C++ standards, making it versatile for projects using different variations of these languages.
  • Detailed Feedback
    The tool provides detailed messages and suggestions for detected issues, helping developers understand and resolve problems efficiently.

Possible disadvantages of PC-lint

  • Complex Configuration
    Setting up PC-lint properly requires a deep understanding of both the tool and the project's code base, which can be complex and time-consuming.
  • Steep Learning Curve
    Due to its comprehensive capabilities, new users may find it challenging to learn and effectively use the tool without considerable effort.
  • Cost
    PC-lint is a paid tool, which might be a drawback for individual developers or small teams with limited budgets.
  • Outdated Interface
    The user interface of PC-lint is considered outdated compared to more modern static analysis tools, potentially affecting usability and user experience.
  • Limited Integration
    PC-lint offers fewer integrations with modern development environments and continuous integration tools compared to some other static analyzers.

Parasoft C/C++test videos

Parasoft C/C++test

More videos:

  • Review - Parasoft C/C++test for Embedded Development

PC-lint videos

Using PC-Lint for MISRA and static code analysis

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Parasoft C/C++test and PC-lint)
Code Analysis
64 64%
36% 36
Code Coverage
57 57%
43% 43
Code Review
52 52%
48% 48
Development
83 83%
17% 17

User comments

Share your experience with using Parasoft C/C++test and PC-lint. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Parasoft C/C++test and PC-lint, you can also consider the following products

Cppcheck - Cppcheck is an analysis tool for C/C++ code. It detects the types of bugs that the compilers normally fail to detect. The goal is no false positives. CppCheckDownload cppcheck for free.

SonarQube - SonarQube, a core component of the Sonar solution, is an open source, self-managed tool that systematically helps developers and organizations deliver Clean Code.

Clang Static Analyzer - The Clang Static Analyzer is a source code analysis tool that finds bugs in C, C++, and Objective-C...

Coverity Scan - Find and fix defects in your Java, C/C++ or C# open source project for free

Polyspace - Polyspace is a suite of static code analysis products developed by Matlab to help software developers, QA Testers, and engineers find critical problems in their code and fix them before they become a serious threat.

lgtm.com - lgtm.com is a platform for code analytics.