Parcel VS WebdriverIO
Compare Parcel VS WebdriverIO and see what are their differences
The PAQATO After-Sales Experience Platform is the growth driver that makes online stores successful for tomorrow.
featured
Parcel
Webpack
rollup.js
17track
AfterShip
Vite
esbuild
Grunt
WebdriverIO
Selenium
Cypress.io
Jasmine
Nightwatch.js
Robot framework
puppeteer
Karma
Parcel WebdriverIOBased on our record, Parcel seems to be a lot more popular than WebdriverIO. While we know about 103 links to Parcel, we've tracked only 2 mentions of WebdriverIO. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
Parcel is a fast and zero-configuration web application bundler designed to simplify the build process for modern web projects. It's not limited to web applications, and it can be used to build packages targeting the browser or Node.js. - Source: dev.to / 24 days ago
At first we wanted to just get rid of all the helper utilities. Keep only the kernel, but this would mean a loss of backward compatibility. We needed some efficient code processing instead with recomposition and tree-shaking. We needed a bundler. But which one? Our testing approach relies on targets, not sources. We rebuilt the project frequently, speed was critical requirement. In essence, we chose a solution... - Source: dev.to / about 1 month ago
It runs using Parcel, very simple and easy to setup. The app has 3 files:. - Source: dev.to / about 1 month ago
In the Changelog Podcast episode referenced above, Dan Abramov alluded to Parcel working on RSC support as well. I couldn’t find much to back up that claim aside from a GitHub issue discussing directives and a social media post by Devon Govett (creator of Parcel), so I can’t say for sure if Parcel is currently a viable option for developing with RSCs. - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago
Once you build a simple Vite backend integration, try not to complicate Vite's configuration unless you absolutely must. Vite has become one of the most popular bundlers in the frontend space, but it wasn't the first and it certainly won't be the last. In my 7 years of building for the web, I've used Grunt, Gulp, Webpack, esbuild, and Parcel. Snowpack and Rome came-and-went before I ever had a chance to try them.... - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago
WebdriverIO - Automated testing based on the WebDriver protocol. - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
The WebDriverIO project is available on GitHub and the overall statistics speak a lot about the popularity of this JavaScript framework. It has more than 6.7K stars and the project has been forked around 1.9K times. As of writing this blog, the latest version of the WebDriverIO JavaScript framework is 7.7.2. - Source: dev.to / almost 3 years ago
Webpack - Webpack is a module bundler. Its main purpose is to bundle JavaScript files for usage in a browser, yet it is also capable of transforming, bundling, or packaging just about any resource or asset.
Selenium - Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that.
rollup.js - Rollup is a module bundler for JavaScript which compiles small pieces of code into a larger piece such as application.
Cypress.io - Slow, difficult and unreliable testing for anything that runs in a browser. Install Cypress in seconds and take the pain out of front-end testing.
17track - All-in-one package tracking
Jasmine - Behavior-Driven JavaScript