Parcel VS Snowpack
Compare Parcel VS Snowpack and see what are their differences
The PAQATO After-Sales Experience Platform is the growth driver that makes online stores successful for tomorrow.
featured
Parcel
Webpack
17track
rollup.js
AfterShip
Vite
esbuild
Grunt
Snowpack
Webpack
Browserify
Vite
SvelteKit
rollup.js
Brunch
Next.js
Parcel SnowpackBased on our record, Parcel seems to be a lot more popular than Snowpack. While we know about 103 links to Parcel, we've tracked only 2 mentions of Snowpack. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
Parcel is a fast and zero-configuration web application bundler designed to simplify the build process for modern web projects. It's not limited to web applications, and it can be used to build packages targeting the browser or Node.js. - Source: dev.to / 1 day ago
At first we wanted to just get rid of all the helper utilities. Keep only the kernel, but this would mean a loss of backward compatibility. We needed some efficient code processing instead with recomposition and tree-shaking. We needed a bundler. But which one? Our testing approach relies on targets, not sources. We rebuilt the project frequently, speed was critical requirement. In essence, we chose a solution... - Source: dev.to / 11 days ago
It runs using Parcel, very simple and easy to setup. The app has 3 files:. - Source: dev.to / 18 days ago
In the Changelog Podcast episode referenced above, Dan Abramov alluded to Parcel working on RSC support as well. I couldn’t find much to back up that claim aside from a GitHub issue discussing directives and a social media post by Devon Govett (creator of Parcel), so I can’t say for sure if Parcel is currently a viable option for developing with RSCs. - Source: dev.to / 30 days ago
Once you build a simple Vite backend integration, try not to complicate Vite's configuration unless you absolutely must. Vite has become one of the most popular bundlers in the frontend space, but it wasn't the first and it certainly won't be the last. In my 7 years of building for the web, I've used Grunt, Gulp, Webpack, esbuild, and Parcel. Snowpack and Rome came-and-went before I ever had a chance to try them.... - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
I know there's Snowpack (though it is no longer maintained), which takes a different, a bit more complex approach. The CJS runtime approach seems way simpler, almost too good to be true? Is there something I'm missing? Source: almost 2 years ago
This is somewhat reminiscent of the Astro devs’ decision late last year to transition Astro from their own Snowpack platform to Vite. It wasn’t easy, but the performance win was significant. - Source: dev.to / almost 2 years ago
Webpack - Webpack is a module bundler. Its main purpose is to bundle JavaScript files for usage in a browser, yet it is also capable of transforming, bundling, or packaging just about any resource or asset.
17track - All-in-one package tracking
Browserify - Browserify lets you require('modules') in the browser by bundling up all of your dependencies.
rollup.js - Rollup is a module bundler for JavaScript which compiles small pieces of code into a larger piece such as application.
Vite - Next Generation Frontend Tooling
AfterShip - AfterShip is the shipment tracking API for ecommerce businesses and marketplaces.