Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Parcel VS LambdaTest

Compare Parcel VS LambdaTest and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Parcel logo Parcel

Blazing fast, zero configuration web application bundler

LambdaTest logo LambdaTest

Perform Web Testing on 2000+ Browsers & OS
  • Parcel Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-12-13
  • LambdaTest Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-09

LambdaTest is a cloud-based cross browser testing platform that helps enterprises run web automation tests at scale (through parallel testing).

Selenium Automation Grid and Cypress CLI on LambdaTest You can attain better browser coverage by running tests across 2,000+ different browsers, devices, and operating systems online. LambdaTest provides a secure, scalable, and reliable cloud-based Selenium Grid that helps run Selenium tests at a faster pace. The Cypress CLI on LambdaTest, helps you expand Cypress test coverage to 40+ browser versions across Windows and macOS platforms. Along with automation testing, you can also perform manual tests, visual UI tests, and real-time tests.

**LT Browser - Responsive Web Testing* Additionally, LambdaTest also offers complimentary access of LT browser - a path-breaking developer-oriented tool that helps assess the responsiveness of your website. LT Browser eases the task of mobile testing as responsive tests can run against 50+ different device resolutions. You can also create custom device (or viewports) and test localhost URL without any extensions (or tunnels).

Parcel

Pricing URL
-
$ Details
Platforms
-
Release Date
-

LambdaTest

$ Details
freemium $15.0 / Monthly
Platforms
Browser Windows Android Web iOS Google Chrome Mac OSX Firefox Safari
Release Date
2017 January
Startup details
Country
United States
State
California
Founder(s)
Asad Khan
Employees
100 - 249

Parcel features and specs

  • Zero Configuration
    Parcel requires minimal to no configuration to get started, making it extremely user-friendly, especially for beginners or small projects.
  • Fast Bundling
    Parcel uses worker threads to parallelize tasks, which significantly speeds up the bundling process compared to other bundlers that do not use this approach.
  • Out-of-the-box support for many file types
    Parcel supports many file types (e.g., JavaScript, CSS, HTML, images) right out-of-the-box without needing additional plugins or configurations.
  • Hot Module Replacement (HMR)
    Parcel offers built-in HMR, allowing developers to see changes in real-time without needing to refresh the browser, leading to a faster development cycle.
  • Tree Shaking
    Parcel automatically performs tree shaking, removing unused code from the production build to reduce file sizes, which can improve loading times.
  • Code Splitting
    Parcel has automatic code splitting capabilities which help to improve performance by loading only the necessary assets.
  • Extensible via Plugins
    Parcel’s plugin system allows developers to extend its functionality easily if custom or additional features are needed.

Possible disadvantages of Parcel

  • Community and Ecosystem
    The community and ecosystem around Parcel are smaller compared to other bundlers like Webpack, so finding solutions and third-party plugins might be more challenging.
  • Limited Customization
    While the zero-config aspect is beneficial, it also means there are fewer customization options out-of-the-box, which might be limiting for complex projects needing specific configurations.
  • Performance with Large Projects
    For very large projects, Parcel's performance can become a bottleneck, particularly when it comes to initial build times.
  • Documentation
    The documentation, while improving, is not as comprehensive as some other tools, making it harder for developers to find detailed information when they encounter issues.
  • Dependency Bloat
    Parcel can sometimes include more dependencies than necessary in the final bundle, potentially increasing the final bundle size.

LambdaTest features and specs

  • Selenium Grid For Mobile Web-Automation Testing
  • Selenium Web Testing Automation
  • Parallel Testing For Goto Market Launch
  • API for Continuous Testing
  • Live Interactive Browser Compatibility Testing
  • Continuous Testing with Continuous Integration Tools
  • LT Browser App for Responsive Testing
  • Faster Automated Screenshot Testing

Analysis of Parcel

Overall verdict

  • Parcel is a good choice for developers looking for a hassle-free, efficient, and beginner-friendly bundler. Its minimal configuration approach and speed make it ideal for small to medium-sized projects. However, for highly complex projects that require intricate and highly customized build processes, other bundlers might be more suitable due to their advanced configuration capabilities.

Why this product is good

  • Parcel is a web application bundler that is appreciated for its simplicity and zero-config philosophy. It automatically detects the files needed for a project without requiring a complex configuration file. Its fast performance is attributed to parallelization and efficient caching. Additionally, Parcel offers out-of-the-box support for JavaScript, CSS, HTML, asset management, and various types of file transformations, making it a versatile tool for web developers.

Recommended for

  • Developers new to module bundlers or looking for an easy-to-setup tool.
  • Projects that value speed and simplicity in their build processes.
  • Developers who need a bundler capable of handling multiple asset types with minimal configuration.
  • Teams that prefer convention over configuration and want to get started quickly without diving deep into complex bundler settings.

Parcel videos

Danby Parcel Guard Smart Mailbox blogger Review

More videos:

  • Review - PARCEL MOVIE REVIEW | SASWATA CHATTERJEE | RITUPARNA SENGUPTA | RUPAM'S REVIEW
  • Review - Le Parcel Box review

LambdaTest videos

Cross Browser Testing Using LambdaTest | LambdaTest Tutorial | Selenium Training | Edureka

More videos:

  • Tutorial - LambdaTest Cross Browser Testing Tool Tutorial
  • Review - LambdaTest vs BrowserStack - Browser Compatibility Testing Tools Reviews

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Parcel and LambdaTest)
Web Application Bundler
100 100%
0% 0
Website Testing
0 0%
100% 100
JS Build Tools
100 100%
0% 0
Automated Testing
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Parcel and LambdaTest. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Parcel and LambdaTest

Parcel Reviews

Rollup v. Webpack v. Parcel
Parcel's caching feature sees dramatically decreases in time consumption after the initial run. For frequent, small changes, in smaller projects **Parcel*8 is a great choice.
Source: x-team.com
If you’ve ever configured Webpack, Parcel will blow your mind!
document.body.className = document.body.className.replace(/(^|\s)is-noJs(\s|$)/, "$1is-js$2")HomepageHomepageJavascriptBecome a memberSign inGet startedIf you’ve ever configured Webpack, Parcel will blow your mind!And how to hit the ground running with Parcel.Ibrahim ButtBlockedUnblockFollowFollowingMar 16, 2018Click here to share this article on LinkedIn »Zero...
Source: medium.com
First impressions with Parcel JS
The big selling point of Parcel though is that it offers a zero configuration experience. This means all the features are available out of the box! It also boasts blazing fast bundle times 👟 You won’t be configuring how Parcel works or having to draft in various plugins to get started. If you do need something, Parcel magically detects this and will pull in stuff for you on...
Source: codeburst.io
Parcel vs webpack - Jakob Lind
Parcel has made their own benchmarks of Parcel and other bundlers. Parcel has been criticized because they have not made the benchmarks open source. People cannot verify that the benchmarks are true when they are not open source.

LambdaTest Reviews

  1. Alina-Novikava
    · Software QA Engineer at uTest ·
    LambdaTest an essential tool for cross browser compatibility

    Initially we were skeptical whether a cloud infrastructure would be able to give us the flexibility, speed and browser coverage we need for our agile sprints. But LambdaTest has been a complete value for money to us.

    They usually get the latest browsers on-board under 2 weeks time and are never compromising the experience over legacy browsers at the same time. The machines are quick to load and we rely heavily over the Monday integration, it helps us share screenshots instantly among ourselves without having to be stuck in long email chains.

    We have been using LambdaTest for around 8 months and it has been so far so good.

    🏁 Competitors: Sauce Labs, CrossBrowserTesting
    👍 Pros:    Underpass app, very helpful for local testing on development environment|Stability is good, downtimes are notified if any|Up to date with latest browsers and os like safari 14, macos big sur|Integrations with monday, jira, and more prominent tools
    👎 Cons:    Need more devices for screenshot testing|Would love to see mobile application testing
  2. Lee Jelley
    · DevOps & Cloud Engineer at Contino ·
    LambdaTest Our Go-To Platform For Selenium Testing

    LambdaTest has made our testing process less tedious with automated parallel testing. Builds that took days to complete with in-house infrastructure were executed in a couple hours. Parallel testing has helped us with faster feedback loops to scale up our go to market efforts.

    Having a global user base we have active traffic from varied locations and testing on multiple platforms and browsers is a continuous process for the team. The feature that stands out for us is geolocation testing, all you need to do is run the capabilities and test the website for the desired location. We use Azure Pipelines for CI/CD and LambdaTest extension for Azure has helped us get a seamless testing experience for our privately hosted projects. Thanks to that we are now able to easily ensure browser compatibility for all the changes before we move them to Prod. Kudos to the team!

    🏁 Competitors: Sauce Labs, CrossBrowserTesting
    👍 Pros:    Support team is very active|Extensions to perform testing with ci/cd tools like azure pipelines|Always up to date with latest browsers|Offers 70+ integrations, glad to see it integrates with jira|Affordable pricing option
    👎 Cons:    Cypress integration is missing|Native app testing is not available yet
  3. Rod Morales
    · Front End Developer at SavvyCard ·
    Easy, Useful and provides lots of data for debugging

    Have been using Lambdatest for around 6 months now, and could say that it’s a useful testing tool for our team. Offering great combinations of browsers and operating systems for you to test on and most importantly there are many types of additional logs that come with each test which helps in debugging.. Glad to see the integration with Travis CI due to which we could optimally use this tool with our CI CD pipelines directly. We were able to effectively run TestNG and Selenium tests using their documentation and as an added advantage their support team is quick and helpful

    🏁 Competitors: Sauce Labs, CrossBrowserTesting
    👍 Pros:    Detailed documentation, helps you with quick implementation|Apis for extracting test run data like logs and run video|Good community to help to dig deep for possible outcomes.|Screenshot testing feature|Integration with jira
    👎 Cons:    There is a latency in a single test when compared to a local machine. maybe because of the cloud? so you have to run in parallel to cut down on testing times.

Top Selenium Alternatives
Lambdatest is a comprehensive browser automation tool that provides a cloud-based platform for automated and manual cross-browser testing. With support for a plethora of browser and OS combinations, it ensures that web applications perform consistently in various environments. Lambdatest integrates well with CI/CD pipelines, supports visual regression testing, and offers...
Source: bugbug.io
16 Best Android Emulators For PCs In 2023
LambdaTest comes with Native App Testing features that let you conduct online live interactive native mobile app testing anywhere in the world by simply uploading your .apk file. Perform cross browser testing and run your automation tests at scale.
Source: theqalead.com
Best Automation Testing Tools (Free and Paid) | July 2022
It allows us to test on the latest mobile and desktop browsers on the cloud. We can ensure our website is compatible across all browsers and devices by performing Real-time cross Browser Compatibility testing with LambdaTest.

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Parcel seems to be a lot more popular than LambdaTest. While we know about 113 links to Parcel, we've tracked only 10 mentions of LambdaTest. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Parcel mentions (113)

  • Migrating a JavaScript Project from Prettier and ESLint to BiomeJS
    Https://parceljs.org/ is another. It even supports languages like `` out of the box which is pretty cool. IIRC it downloads necessarily plugins on the fly. - Source: Hacker News / 28 days ago
  • Create React App is Deprecated – What’s Next ?
    Parcel is another alternative that requires zero configuration and is super fast. If you want a simple React setup without any hassle, Parcel is a great choice. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
  • Bun 1.2 Is Released
    From its documentation [1] it looks a lot like a parceljs replacement [2], i.e. a zero config bundler which processes and bundles the dependencies in .html pages. So great for simple websites, not for replacing an entire Vite stack. [1] https://bun.sh/docs/bundler/fullstack [2] https://parceljs.org. - Source: Hacker News / 4 months ago
  • What is Evan You doing by creating VoidZero, and what are the issues with JS toolchains?
    Packagers are the ones we most frequently come into contact with, such as Webpack Vite and Parcel. The latter may not be commonly used, but it is also a well-established tool. - Source: dev.to / 6 months ago
  • Node.js: A brief history of cjs, bundlers, and esm
    Npm packages dramatically sped up the productivity of developers by being able to leverage other developers' work. However, it had a major disadvantage: cjs was not compatible with web browsers. To solve this problem, the concept of bundlers was born. Browserify was the first bundler which essentially worked by traversing an entry point and "bundling" all the require()-ed code into a single .js file compatible... - Source: dev.to / 6 months ago
View more

LambdaTest mentions (10)

  • Testing Transformed: QA’s New Role in Digital Transformation
    AI-Powered Testing: You’ve heard enough about this on LinkedIn & elsewhere on the internet. We’ve seen enough proof that it is unlikely to be a passing cloud. I don’t have specific advice on where you can use these ML, NLP, and LLM technologies, but I already see a lot of testers beginning to use it for test case development, coding & writing emails. Tools like LambdaTest are already leveraging AI to enhance test... - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
  • Agile Traceability: Connecting the Dots Without Slowing Down – Part 2
    Tools like LambdaTest offer automated traceability features designed to keep your workflows smooth and your team aligned with what matters most. As your projects evolve, LambdaTest scales with you, providing a simple yet effective way to connect the dots, and helping your team stay focused on delivering great results without the extra hassle. - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago
  • Pyppeteer Tutorial: The Ultimate Guide to Using Puppeteer with Python
    Import asyncio Import pytest From pyppeteer.errors import PageError From urllib.parse import quote Import os Import sys From os import environ From pyppeteer import connect, launch Exec_platform = os.getenv('EXEC_PLATFORM') Test_url = 'https://lambdatest.com/' # Selectors of the page # Pytest fixture for browser setup @pytest.fixture(scope='function') Async def browser(): if exec_platform == 'local': ... - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
  • Simplify Your Debugging Process With Enhanced LT Debug 2.0
    If you want to perform cross-domain Ajax requests faster, adding the (Access-Control-Allow-Origin: *) rule to your response header will allow you to do so. For example, you can bypass CORS on lambdatest.com when you turn it on while accessing the resources. - Source: dev.to / about 2 years ago
  • Testing Modern Applications With Playwright 🎭
    Const { webkit, chromium } = require('playwright'); (async () => { const browser = await chromium.launch(); const page = await browser.newPage(); // Listen for all console logs page.on('console', msg => console.log(msg.text())) // Listen for all console events and handle errors page.on('console', msg => { if (msg.type() === 'error') ... - Source: dev.to / about 2 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Parcel and LambdaTest, you can also consider the following products

Webpack - Webpack is a module bundler. Its main purpose is to bundle JavaScript files for usage in a browser, yet it is also capable of transforming, bundling, or packaging just about any resource or asset.

BrowserStack - BrowserStack is a software testing platform for developers to comprehensively test websites and mobile applications for quality.

rollup.js - Rollup is a module bundler for JavaScript which compiles small pieces of code into a larger piece such as application.

Sauce Labs - Test mobile or web apps instantly across 700+ browser/OS/device platform combinations - without infrastructure setup.

esbuild - An extremely fast JavaScript bundler and minifier

Selenium - Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that.