Software Alternatives & Reviews

Pamac VS pikaur

Compare Pamac VS pikaur and see what are their differences

Pamac logo Pamac

Graphical Package Manager for Manjaro Linux (based on libalpm).

pikaur logo pikaur

AUR helper with minimal dependencies. Review PKGBUILDs all in once, next build them all without user interaction.Inspired by pacaur, yaourt and yay.
  • Pamac Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-23
  • pikaur Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-08-18

Pamac videos

Install Package Manager in Arch Linux Pamac-AUR, Pamac-classic or Octopi

pikaur videos

Pikaur et Wish, deux successeurs potentiels à Pacaur ?

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Pamac and pikaur)
Work Music
48 48%
52% 52
Focus Music
47 47%
53% 53
Front End Package Manager
Music
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Pamac and pikaur. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, pikaur seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 4 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Pamac mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Pamac yet. Tracking of Pamac recommendations started around Mar 2021.

pikaur mentions (4)

  • Using pikaur, how would I disable asking me "Do you want to edit PKGBUILD for <package_name> package? [Y/n]"
    Have a look here. Did you not search for the answer? That's part of the Arch(based) ethos. We tend to like to learn by reading whatever is required. :). Source: about 1 year ago
  • Nala v0.10.0 - Nala's A Legible Apt
    I was also looking for something nicer for Arch, but haven't found anything as nice as Nala. For now, I switched to pikaur, which at least displays updates in a much clearer way. Source: almost 2 years ago
  • I created a tool to install AUR packages in 1 click from the website: Aurin
    Nice, but this definately needs a dependency resolver, otherwise it can only install a fraction of the available AUR packages. Since you're already using python, you may adapt your whole code on top a another python-based AUR helper like pikaur. You maybe also could take at the dep resolver of my ABS project. It's python, too, maybe not as clean as pikaur's code but simpler and not too integrated. Source: about 2 years ago
  • Which AUR-helper is recommended?
    I've been using pikaur ever since pacaur became abandonware and I'm very happy with it, can't recommend it enough. Sure, it's not implemented in Rust or Go so it's certainly not as cool as yay or paru but that doesn't really matter much to me, being an end user. I don't really care as long as it does its job, as advertised. Source: about 3 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Pamac and pikaur, you can also consider the following products

Yay - Yay is an AUR helper written in go, based on the design of yaourt, apacman and pacaur.

paru - An AUR helper written in Rust and based on the design of yay. It aims to be your standard pacman wrapping AUR helper with minimal interaction.

Octopi - Powerful Pacman (GUI | frontend) written in Qt

Trizen - Trizen AUR Package Manager: A lightweight wrapper for AUR.

pacman (package manager) - The pacman package manager is one of the major distinguishing features of ...

pacaur - An AUR helper that minimizes user interaction.