Software Alternatives & Reviews
Register | Login

pacman (package manager) VS Portage

Compare pacman (package manager) VS Portage and see what are their differences

BoxyHQ
B2B SaaS: Make your app enterprise-ready! Authentication - SAML/OIDC SSO, Directory Sync (SCIM 2.0), Audit Logs, Data Privacy Vault, and more! featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

pacman (package manager) logo pacman (package manager)

The pacman package manager is one of the major distinguishing features of ...

Portage logo Portage

Portage is source-based package manager used by Gentoo and its descendants. It controls all process from fetching source through building it, installing into clean environment to "merging" with already installed software.
  • pacman (package manager) Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-01-07
  • Portage Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-26

pacman (package manager) videos

No pacman (package manager) videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

+ Add video

Portage videos

+ Add

Nursing video 2 portage learning, prerequisite courses

More videos:

  • Review - THOROGOOD 1892 PORTAGE Series #814-6522 [ THE BOOT GUY REVIEWS ]
  • Review - Thorogood Portage Boots Review in Indigo Chromexcel

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to pacman (package manager) and Portage)

pacman (package manager)

Portage

Front End Package Manager
65 65%
Front End Package Manager
35% 35
Package Manager
55 55%
Package Manager
45% 45
Developer Tools
0 0%
Developer Tools
100% 100
Windows Tools
100 100%
Windows Tools
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using pacman (package manager) and Portage. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, pacman (package manager) seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 39 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

pacman (package manager) mentions (39)

  • Been thinking of switching to linux but I am a noob
    However, that "pacman -S" command has lots of switches (see section 1.1.1 ==> https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/pacman ). Source: 5 months ago
  • Project on GitHub - Customizable Arch Linux Podman images based on the official Arch Linux Docker image
    Automatic installation of packages during building utilizes pacman and aurman with the supported "package sources" being:. Source: 9 months ago
  • A response to the Fedora 40 Privacy-Preserving Telemetry Proposal
    * Package management and DNF syntax usage are big topics. Follow the Arch Wiki example for the "pacman" package management tool ==> https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/pacman. Source: 10 months ago
  • Could someone make a Decky plugin that automates installing common dependencies?
    Should be possible as the Arch distro SteamOS is built on includes pacman. Source: 10 months ago
  • How to install optional dependencies
    All of this is explained in the wiki page. Source: 11 months ago
View more

Portage mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Portage yet. Tracking of Portage recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing pacman (package manager) and Portage, you can also consider the following products

Synaptic - Please take a minute to watch our video, it gives an overview of Synaptic's role in financial services.

Conda - Binary package manager with support for environments.

Chocolatey - The sane way to manage software on Windows.

pkgsrc - pkgsrc is a framework for building over 17,000 open source software packages.

Pamac - Graphical Package Manager for Manjaro Linux (based on libalpm).

Pacman - Pacman was developed to be the package manager for Arch Linux, and is also used by KDE-focused Chakra Linux.

Loading...