Software Alternatives & Reviews
Register | Login

PacketCheck VS iperf

Compare PacketCheck VS iperf and see what are their differences

Hyperview
DCIM software reinvented. featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

PacketCheck logo PacketCheck

GL's PacketCheck™- is a PC based Ethernet test tool that is designed to check frame transport

iperf logo iperf

A TCP, UDP, and SCTP network bandwidth measurement tool
  • PacketCheck Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-05-06
  • iperf Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-17

PacketCheck videos

No PacketCheck videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

+ Add video

iperf videos

+ Add

Using Iperf to measure network speed / bandwidth

More videos:

  • Tutorial - How to use iperf to test local network LAN speed in Windows 10
  • Review - [HOWTO] Test My Network Speed?! [iPerf & JPerf]

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to PacketCheck and iperf)

PacketCheck

iperf

Network & Admin
13 13%
Network & Admin
87% 87
Monitoring Tools
7 7%
Monitoring Tools
93% 93
Log Management
9 9%
Log Management
91% 91
Tool
100 100%
Tool
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using PacketCheck and iperf. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, iperf seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 4 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

PacketCheck mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of PacketCheck yet. Tracking of PacketCheck recommendations started around Mar 2021.

iperf mentions (4)

  • Microsoft: Don't Use Iperf3 on Windows
    Just some clarification: IPerf 2 is different from the iperf3 found at https://github.com/esnet/iperf. - Source: Hacker News / 18 days ago
  • Yet Another Bench Script (YABS): evaluate Linux server performance with this simple Bash script and utility
    Network - network throughput (both incoming and outgoing) is tested using iperf3 on several geographically diverse public iperf servers. Source: over 1 year ago
  • Speed testing Visible with a modem
    File transfer using iperf3 over Tailscale. I noticed that the bandwidth to my home computer (on a 500/500 fiber connection) was higher than with speedtest.net. For the first few days I was getting downloads and uploads of 28Mbps (+/- std dev of 6Mbps) and 150ms latency (+/- 35ms). After somewhere around 100GB total transfer (maybe half of that over Tailscale), it is now downloading and uploading at 10Mbps (+/-... Source: about 2 years ago
  • FTP upload speed isn't great
    I can add to this. I have two mini self contained projects to create multiarch static bins of mtr and iperf3 for general usage. Source: almost 3 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing PacketCheck and iperf, you can also consider the following products

JPerf - This project gives a better UI and new functionalities to the initial JPerf 1.

SASUnit - SASUnit is a collection of programs and macros that are mostly used by networking experts to execute codes and verify results by inspecting datasets, macro-variables, and log files.

mtr - mtr combines the functionality of the 'traceroute' and 'ping' programs in a single...

nuttcp - nuttcp is another network test tool, similar to iperf2 and iperf3, that has a number of unique features.

Wireshark - Wireshark is a network protocol analyzer for Unix and Windows. It lets you capture and interactively browse the traffic running on a computer network.

NetStress - NetStress is a user-friendly benchmarking tool that is mostly used by networking professionals to measure the network performance of both wired and wireless connections.

Loading...