Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Packet Sender VS Port Map

Compare Packet Sender VS Port Map and see what are their differences

Packet Sender logo Packet Sender

Packet Sender can send and receive UDP, TCP, and SSL on the ports of your choosing.

Port Map logo Port Map

TheCodingMonkeys, authors of software like SubEthaEdit.
  • Packet Sender Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-01-29
  • Port Map Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-05-08

Packet Sender features and specs

  • Open Source
    Packet Sender is open source, allowing users to inspect, modify, and enhance the code according to their needs.
  • Cross-Platform Compatibility
    The application is available on multiple operating systems, including Windows, macOS, and Linux, offering flexibility and accessibility for various users.
  • User-Friendly Interface
    Packet Sender provides an intuitive and easy-to-navigate interface, making it accessible for both beginners and advanced users.
  • Versatile Functionality
    The tool supports sending and receiving TCP, UDP, and SSL packets, making it versatile for different networking needs and testing scenarios.
  • Active Development
    Regular updates and an active development community ensure the tool is continually improving and adapting to user feedback.

Possible disadvantages of Packet Sender

  • Limited Advanced Features
    While Packet Sender is excellent for basic testing, it may lack some of the advanced features found in more specialized network tools.
  • No Built-In Automation
    Packet Sender lacks extensive automation features, which might be inconvenient for users needing to perform repetitive tasks.
  • Documentation
    While adequate for basic use, the documentation may be lacking in depth for more advanced or niche use cases, requiring users to seek additional resources or community help.

Port Map features and specs

  • User-Friendly Interface
    Port Map offers an intuitive and straightforward interface, making it easy for users to configure port forwarding settings without needing complex technical knowledge.
  • macOS Compatibility
    Specifically designed for macOS, providing seamless integration with the operating system and ensuring compatibility with Apple environments.
  • Automatic UPnP/NAT-PMP Support
    Supports automatic configuration of UPnP and NAT-PMP, which allows for easy setup of port forwarding without manual router configuration.

Possible disadvantages of Port Map

  • Limited Platform Support
    Port Map is only available for macOS, which limits its use to users who exclusively operate on Apple systems.
  • Basic Features
    While it handles port forwarding well, the application's functionality is limited compared to more advanced network management tools, lacking features such as detailed traffic analysis.
  • Potential Security Risks
    As with any port forwarding tool, there is a risk of exposing internal network services to external access if not configured correctly, potentially leading to security vulnerabilities.

Packet Sender videos

Dan Dangle - Packet Sender

More videos:

  • Tutorial - Tello EDU Drone Swarming Tutorial with Packet Sender and Python

Port Map videos

No Port Map videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Packet Sender and Port Map)
Monitoring Tools
50 50%
50% 50
Log Management
52 52%
48% 48
Network & Admin
57 57%
43% 43
Productivity
44 44%
56% 56

User comments

Share your experience with using Packet Sender and Port Map. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Packet Sender seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 4 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Packet Sender mentions (4)

  • [Discussion] Send SMS (which is not 100% reliable) alternatives that don't require UI Interaction (which has it's own issues)?
    By googling around I found https://packetsender.com which is able to send-receive packets in various protocols - including UDP. It has desktop apps for Win, Mac and Linux (I used the Linux variant). In the desktop app, under the Tools menu, it has references to mobile apps for Android and iOS, but I had no luck locating them. Source: almost 2 years ago
  • UART command processor, best approach?
    I've slowly transitioned most of my company's projects over to this method for in house testing/calibration and it's made a world of difference. There is something to be said about being able to open putty or Packet Sender and get intimidate feedback on what is happening without having to bust out the debugger. Source: over 3 years ago
  • DUO MFA Issues
    RADIUS uses UDP ports so you can't test it via telnet / test-netconnect (powershell), but there are 3rd party tools like Packet Sender: https://packetsender.com/. Source: over 3 years ago
  • UDP Simulator
    Network Fuzzing is used to send network packets to test network security. You could try one of those. Here's another utility you might want to try. Source: almost 4 years ago

Port Map mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Port Map yet. Tracking of Port Map recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Packet Sender and Port Map, you can also consider the following products

Portfwd - Portfwd, Port Forwarding Daemon, stands for port forwarding daemon.

PortMapper - Do you need to map a specific TCP or UDP port on your machine to another port on another machine?

pwncat - pwncat - netcat on steroids with Firewall, IDS/IPS evasion, bind and reverse shell, self-injecting shell and port forwarding magic - and its fully scriptable with Python (PSE)

Komodia Relay - Free open source tool to perform TCP based session relay

socat - socat is a relay for bidirectional data transfer between two independent data channels.

Simple Port Forwarding - Simple Port Forwarding works with WebPages and not directly with your router.