Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Simple Port Forwarding VS Packet Sender

Compare Simple Port Forwarding VS Packet Sender and see what are their differences

Flowlu
All-in-one work management platform for team collaboration. featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

Simple Port Forwarding logo Simple Port Forwarding

Simple Port Forwarding works with WebPages and not directly with your router.

Packet Sender logo Packet Sender

Packet Sender can send and receive UDP, TCP, and SSL on the ports of your choosing.
  • Simple Port Forwarding Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-05-26
  • Packet Sender Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-01-29

Simple Port Forwarding features and specs

  • User-Friendly Interface
    The application provides an easy-to-use interface that simplifies the process of port forwarding, making it accessible to users with limited technical knowledge.
  • Wide Router Compatibility
    Simple Port Forwarding supports a wide range of router models, increasing its utility for diverse users with different hardware setups.
  • Automation Capabilities
    The software can automate the port forwarding process, which saves time and minimizes errors compared to manual configuration.
  • Pre-Configured Port Lists
    It includes a list of pre-configured ports for common applications and games, expediting the setup process for popular software.
  • Backup and Restore Functionality
    Users can create backups of their port configurations and restore them when needed, protecting against data loss or erroneous changes.

Possible disadvantages of Simple Port Forwarding

  • Limited Free Features
    While the application offers a free version, some features are restricted to the paid version, potentially limiting its functionality for those not willing to pay.
  • Dependent on Router Compatibility
    The effectiveness of Simple Port Forwarding is dependent on the specific router model and firmware version, which may not be supported or could face compatibility issues.
  • Potential Security Risks
    Improper configuration of port forwarding can expose the network to security threats, requiring users to have some understanding of network security.
  • Software Maintenance
    The application may require regular updates to stay compatible with new routers and security standards, demanding ongoing maintenance from developers.
  • Windows Only
    Simple Port Forwarding is only available for Windows users, excluding those on macOS or Linux systems from using this tool.

Packet Sender features and specs

  • Open Source
    Packet Sender is open source, allowing users to inspect, modify, and enhance the code according to their needs.
  • Cross-Platform Compatibility
    The application is available on multiple operating systems, including Windows, macOS, and Linux, offering flexibility and accessibility for various users.
  • User-Friendly Interface
    Packet Sender provides an intuitive and easy-to-navigate interface, making it accessible for both beginners and advanced users.
  • Versatile Functionality
    The tool supports sending and receiving TCP, UDP, and SSL packets, making it versatile for different networking needs and testing scenarios.
  • Active Development
    Regular updates and an active development community ensure the tool is continually improving and adapting to user feedback.

Possible disadvantages of Packet Sender

  • Limited Advanced Features
    While Packet Sender is excellent for basic testing, it may lack some of the advanced features found in more specialized network tools.
  • No Built-In Automation
    Packet Sender lacks extensive automation features, which might be inconvenient for users needing to perform repetitive tasks.
  • Documentation
    While adequate for basic use, the documentation may be lacking in depth for more advanced or niche use cases, requiring users to seek additional resources or community help.

Simple Port Forwarding videos

No Simple Port Forwarding videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Packet Sender videos

+ Add

Dan Dangle - Packet Sender

More videos:

  • Tutorial - Tello EDU Drone Swarming Tutorial with Packet Sender and Python

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Simple Port Forwarding and Packet Sender)

Simple Port Forwarding

Packet Sender

Monitoring Tools
52 52%
Monitoring Tools
48% 48
Log Management
47 47%
Log Management
53% 53
Productivity
58 58%
Productivity
42% 42
Network & Admin
46 46%
Network & Admin
54% 54

User comments

Share your experience with using Simple Port Forwarding and Packet Sender. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Packet Sender seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 4 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Simple Port Forwarding mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Simple Port Forwarding yet. Tracking of Simple Port Forwarding recommendations started around Mar 2021.

Packet Sender mentions (4)

  • [Discussion] Send SMS (which is not 100% reliable) alternatives that don't require UI Interaction (which has it's own issues)?
    By googling around I found https://packetsender.com which is able to send-receive packets in various protocols - including UDP. It has desktop apps for Win, Mac and Linux (I used the Linux variant). In the desktop app, under the Tools menu, it has references to mobile apps for Android and iOS, but I had no luck locating them. Source: almost 2 years ago
  • UART command processor, best approach?
    I've slowly transitioned most of my company's projects over to this method for in house testing/calibration and it's made a world of difference. There is something to be said about being able to open putty or Packet Sender and get intimidate feedback on what is happening without having to bust out the debugger. Source: over 3 years ago
  • DUO MFA Issues
    RADIUS uses UDP ports so you can't test it via telnet / test-netconnect (powershell), but there are 3rd party tools like Packet Sender: https://packetsender.com/. Source: over 3 years ago
  • UDP Simulator
    Network Fuzzing is used to send network packets to test network security. You could try one of those. Here's another utility you might want to try. Source: almost 4 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Simple Port Forwarding and Packet Sender, you can also consider the following products

PortMapper - Do you need to map a specific TCP or UDP port on your machine to another port on another machine?

Portfwd - Portfwd, Port Forwarding Daemon, stands for port forwarding daemon.

socat - socat is a relay for bidirectional data transfer between two independent data channels.

pwncat - pwncat - netcat on steroids with Firewall, IDS/IPS evasion, bind and reverse shell, self-injecting shell and port forwarding magic - and its fully scriptable with Python (PSE)

Komodia Relay - Free open source tool to perform TCP based session relay

Port Map - TheCodingMonkeys, authors of software like SubEthaEdit.

Loading...