Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Packet Sender VS netperf

Compare Packet Sender VS netperf and see what are their differences

Cyclr
Powerful SaaS integration toolkit for SaaS developers - create, amplify, manage and publish native integrations from within your app with Cyclr's flexible Embedded iPaaS. featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

Packet Sender logo Packet Sender

Packet Sender can send and receive UDP, TCP, and SSL on the ports of your choosing.

netperf logo netperf

Netperf is a benchmark that can be used to measure the performance of many different types of networking. It provides tests for both unidirectional throughput, and end-to-end latency. - HewlettPack...
  • Packet Sender Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-01-29
  • netperf Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-07

Packet Sender features and specs

  • Open Source
    Packet Sender is open source, allowing users to inspect, modify, and enhance the code according to their needs.
  • Cross-Platform Compatibility
    The application is available on multiple operating systems, including Windows, macOS, and Linux, offering flexibility and accessibility for various users.
  • User-Friendly Interface
    Packet Sender provides an intuitive and easy-to-navigate interface, making it accessible for both beginners and advanced users.
  • Versatile Functionality
    The tool supports sending and receiving TCP, UDP, and SSL packets, making it versatile for different networking needs and testing scenarios.
  • Active Development
    Regular updates and an active development community ensure the tool is continually improving and adapting to user feedback.

Possible disadvantages of Packet Sender

  • Limited Advanced Features
    While Packet Sender is excellent for basic testing, it may lack some of the advanced features found in more specialized network tools.
  • No Built-In Automation
    Packet Sender lacks extensive automation features, which might be inconvenient for users needing to perform repetitive tasks.
  • Documentation
    While adequate for basic use, the documentation may be lacking in depth for more advanced or niche use cases, requiring users to seek additional resources or community help.

netperf features and specs

  • Comprehensive Performance Testing
    Netperf is a versatile benchmarking tool that provides a robust suite of tests for evaluating various aspects of network performance, such as throughput, latency, and transaction rates. This allows users to gain a detailed understanding of network performance under different conditions.
  • Wide Protocol Support
    The tool supports a range of protocols including TCP, UDP, and SCTP, as well as a variety of test configurations. This flexibility allows users to tailor the tests to match specific network conditions and requirements.
  • Open Source
    Being open-source, Netperf is free to use and can be easily accessed by anyone. This encourages community involvement, fostering an environment where users can contribute to and improve the tool.
  • Cross-Platform Compatibility
    Netperf runs on a variety of operating systems, including Linux, UNIX, and Windows, making it a versatile choice for network performance testing across different environments.

Possible disadvantages of netperf

  • Command-Line Interface
    Netperf primarily operates through a command-line interface, which can be complex and unintuitive for users who prefer graphical user interfaces or are not experienced with command-line operations.
  • Steep Learning Curve
    New users may find it challenging to properly use Netperf due to its wide array of options and configurations. Understanding all the nuances of the tool to perform effective tests can require a significant learning effort.
  • Limited Documentation
    While there is documentation available, it may not be as extensive or as user-friendly as needed, which can make it hard for beginners to quickly find the information they need to execute specific tests.
  • Specialized Use Case
    Netperf is highly specialized for network performance testing, which limits its utility outside of networking contexts. Users seeking a tool with broader capabilities beyond network measurement might need to look elsewhere.

Packet Sender videos

+ Add

Dan Dangle - Packet Sender

More videos:

  • Tutorial - Tello EDU Drone Swarming Tutorial with Packet Sender and Python

netperf videos

+ Add

netperf

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Packet Sender and netperf)

Packet Sender

netperf

Monitoring Tools
45 45%
Monitoring Tools
55% 55
Log Management
49 49%
Log Management
51% 51
Network & Admin
30 30%
Network & Admin
70% 70
Productivity
100 100%
Productivity
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using Packet Sender and netperf. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Packet Sender seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 4 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Packet Sender mentions (4)

  • [Discussion] Send SMS (which is not 100% reliable) alternatives that don't require UI Interaction (which has it's own issues)?
    By googling around I found https://packetsender.com which is able to send-receive packets in various protocols - including UDP. It has desktop apps for Win, Mac and Linux (I used the Linux variant). In the desktop app, under the Tools menu, it has references to mobile apps for Android and iOS, but I had no luck locating them. Source: almost 2 years ago
  • UART command processor, best approach?
    I've slowly transitioned most of my company's projects over to this method for in house testing/calibration and it's made a world of difference. There is something to be said about being able to open putty or Packet Sender and get intimidate feedback on what is happening without having to bust out the debugger. Source: over 3 years ago
  • DUO MFA Issues
    RADIUS uses UDP ports so you can't test it via telnet / test-netconnect (powershell), but there are 3rd party tools like Packet Sender: https://packetsender.com/. Source: over 3 years ago
  • UDP Simulator
    Network Fuzzing is used to send network packets to test network security. You could try one of those. Here's another utility you might want to try. Source: almost 4 years ago

netperf mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of netperf yet. Tracking of netperf recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Packet Sender and netperf, you can also consider the following products

socat - socat is a relay for bidirectional data transfer between two independent data channels.

iperf - A TCP, UDP, and SCTP network bandwidth measurement tool

PortMapper - Do you need to map a specific TCP or UDP port on your machine to another port on another machine?

JPerf - This project gives a better UI and new functionalities to the initial JPerf 1.

Portfwd - Portfwd, Port Forwarding Daemon, stands for port forwarding daemon.

TamoSoft Throughput Test - TamoSoft Throughput Test is a utility for testing the performance of a wireless or wired network.

Loading...