Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login
JP

JPerf VS Packet Sender

Compare JPerf VS Packet Sender and see what are their differences

Insightful.io
The #1 monitoring employee software for clear insights into how your team works. Get real-time and historical data. Understand productivity at every level. featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

JPerf logo JPerf

This project gives a better UI and new functionalities to the initial JPerf 1.

Packet Sender logo Packet Sender

Packet Sender can send and receive UDP, TCP, and SSL on the ports of your choosing.
  • JPerf Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-12-10
  • Packet Sender Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-01-29

JPerf features and specs

  • User-friendly Interface
    JPerf provides a graphical user interface, making it easier for users who are not comfortable with command line tools to perform network performance testing.
  • Cross-platform Compatibility
    JPerf is built on Java, which allows it to run on multiple operating systems including Windows, Linux, and macOS without modifications.
  • Network Performance Visualization
    JPerf offers graphical representations of network performance, such as throughput and jitter, making it easier to understand the results.
  • Integration with iPerf
    JPerf utilizes iPerf as the backend, benefiting from iPerf's robust network performance testing capabilities.
  • Customizable Testing Parameters
    Users can customize parameters like protocols, port numbers, and bandwidth, providing flexibility in performance testing.

Possible disadvantages of JPerf

  • Abandonware
    JPerf has not been actively maintained for several years, which means it may lack support for new features or bug fixes.
  • Limited Functionality Compared to CLI
    While the GUI is user-friendly, some advanced functionalities available in the iPerf command line version are not accessible in JPerf.
  • Dependency on Java
    As JPerf requires Java to run, users must ensure that Java is installed and correctly configured on their systems.
  • Potential Compatibility Issues
    Due to its lack of updates, JPerf may face compatibility issues with newer versions of operating systems or Java.

Packet Sender features and specs

  • Open Source
    Packet Sender is open source, allowing users to inspect, modify, and enhance the code according to their needs.
  • Cross-Platform Compatibility
    The application is available on multiple operating systems, including Windows, macOS, and Linux, offering flexibility and accessibility for various users.
  • User-Friendly Interface
    Packet Sender provides an intuitive and easy-to-navigate interface, making it accessible for both beginners and advanced users.
  • Versatile Functionality
    The tool supports sending and receiving TCP, UDP, and SSL packets, making it versatile for different networking needs and testing scenarios.
  • Active Development
    Regular updates and an active development community ensure the tool is continually improving and adapting to user feedback.

Possible disadvantages of Packet Sender

  • Limited Advanced Features
    While Packet Sender is excellent for basic testing, it may lack some of the advanced features found in more specialized network tools.
  • No Built-In Automation
    Packet Sender lacks extensive automation features, which might be inconvenient for users needing to perform repetitive tasks.
  • Documentation
    While adequate for basic use, the documentation may be lacking in depth for more advanced or niche use cases, requiring users to seek additional resources or community help.

JPerf videos

+ Add

[HOWTO] Test My Network Speed?! [iPerf & JPerf]

Packet Sender videos

+ Add

Dan Dangle - Packet Sender

More videos:

  • Tutorial - Tello EDU Drone Swarming Tutorial with Packet Sender and Python

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to JPerf and Packet Sender)

JPerf

Packet Sender

Monitoring Tools
60 60%
Monitoring Tools
40% 40
Network & Admin
70 70%
Network & Admin
30% 30
Log Management
54 54%
Log Management
46% 46
Tool
100 100%
Tool
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using JPerf and Packet Sender. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Packet Sender seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 4 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

JPerf mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of JPerf yet. Tracking of JPerf recommendations started around Mar 2021.

Packet Sender mentions (4)

  • [Discussion] Send SMS (which is not 100% reliable) alternatives that don't require UI Interaction (which has it's own issues)?
    By googling around I found https://packetsender.com which is able to send-receive packets in various protocols - including UDP. It has desktop apps for Win, Mac and Linux (I used the Linux variant). In the desktop app, under the Tools menu, it has references to mobile apps for Android and iOS, but I had no luck locating them. Source: almost 2 years ago
  • UART command processor, best approach?
    I've slowly transitioned most of my company's projects over to this method for in house testing/calibration and it's made a world of difference. There is something to be said about being able to open putty or Packet Sender and get intimidate feedback on what is happening without having to bust out the debugger. Source: over 3 years ago
  • DUO MFA Issues
    RADIUS uses UDP ports so you can't test it via telnet / test-netconnect (powershell), but there are 3rd party tools like Packet Sender: https://packetsender.com/. Source: over 3 years ago
  • UDP Simulator
    Network Fuzzing is used to send network packets to test network security. You could try one of those. Here's another utility you might want to try. Source: almost 4 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing JPerf and Packet Sender, you can also consider the following products

iperf - A TCP, UDP, and SCTP network bandwidth measurement tool

Portfwd - Portfwd, Port Forwarding Daemon, stands for port forwarding daemon.

TamoSoft Throughput Test - TamoSoft Throughput Test is a utility for testing the performance of a wireless or wired network.

pwncat - pwncat - netcat on steroids with Firewall, IDS/IPS evasion, bind and reverse shell, self-injecting shell and port forwarding magic - and its fully scriptable with Python (PSE)

netperf - Netperf is a benchmark that can be used to measure the performance of many different types of networking. It provides tests for both unidirectional throughput, and end-to-end latency. - HewlettPack...

socat - socat is a relay for bidirectional data transfer between two independent data channels.

Loading...