Software Alternatives & Reviews

Packer VS BoxyHQ

Compare Packer VS BoxyHQ and see what are their differences

Packer logo Packer

Packer is an open-source software for creating identical machine images from a single source configuration.

BoxyHQ logo BoxyHQ

B2B SaaS: Make your app enterprise-ready! Authentication - SAML/OIDC SSO, Directory Sync (SCIM 2.0), Audit Logs, Data Privacy Vault, and more!
Visit Website
  • Packer Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-15
  • BoxyHQ Website - BoxyHQ
    Website - BoxyHQ //
    2024-04-17
  • BoxyHQ Admin Portal Dashboard - BoxyHQ
    Admin Portal Dashboard - BoxyHQ //
    2024-04-17
  • BoxyHQ Admin Portal Login - BoxyHQ
    Admin Portal Login - BoxyHQ //
    2024-04-17

SaaS, Premium Self-Hosted, or FREE OSS Self-Hosted

  1. Enterprise Single Sign On (SSO) SAML SSO enables a secure authentication via an organization’s Identity Provider (IdP), as opposed to users or IT admins managing thousands, of usernames and passwords. With our product SAML Jackson, enterprise users can access your product via one of their secure IdPs (like Okta, Microsoft Azure, AWS, etc), which manages access and security for the entire organization.

  2. Directory Sync Organizations use directories from different providers to manage users and enforce their access to organization resources. By integrating our Directory Sync product into your solution you can activate and deactivate user accounts, create groups, and keep your app in sync with the user directory in real-time. Supports the SCIM 2.0 protocol.

Additionally, we offer Audit Logs to track critical events in your application and a Data Privacy Vault to safeguard sensitive data.

BoxyHQ

Website
boxyhq.com
$ Details
free $49.0 / Monthly (Per connection)
Platforms
SaaS Premium Self-Hosted FREE OSS Self-Hosted

Packer videos

No Packer videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

+ Add video

BoxyHQ videos

SAML Single Sign-On (SSO) login demo

More videos:

  • Tutorial - Unlocking the Power of Open-Source SAML SSO with BoxyHQ's Enterprise Single Sign-On Tutorial
  • Review - BoxyHQ: The Open-Source SSO Solution for Effortless Integrations
  • Review - Securing The Web Ecosystem in 2023 - A Year in Review by BoxyHQ - Newsletter001
  • Review - AMA with Deepak, Maintainer of BoxyHQ!

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Packer and BoxyHQ)
DevOps Tools
100 100%
0% 0
Developer Tools
75 75%
25% 25
Continuous Integration And Delivery
B2B SaaS
0 0%
100% 100

Questions and Answers

As answered by people managing Packer and BoxyHQ.

What makes your product unique?

BoxyHQ's answer:

BoxyHQ stands out for its comprehensive suite of security building blocks tailored specifically for developers. With features like SAML/OIDC Single Sign-On (SSO) and Directory Sync with SCIM 2.0, BoxyHQ simplifies identity management and access control for B2B SaaS companies. Its focus on providing a seamless and customizable solution empowers developers to enhance security without compromising user experience. Additionally, BoxyHQ offers Audit Logs to track critical events within the product and a Privacy Vault, an API to protect sensitive data.

Why should a person choose your product over its competitors?

BoxyHQ's answer:

BoxyHQ stands out for several reasons:

  1. Developer-Obsessed: We prioritize developers, offering a seamless and intuitive platform for integration and customization.
  2. Secure by Design: With security as our foundation, we ensure robust protection for your data and applications at every level.
  3. Budget-Friendly: We believe in accessibility, offering competitive pricing options starting at $0.00 to suit various budgets.
  4. Transparency and Customizability: Our open-source approach provides full visibility into our codebase and allows for tailored solutions to meet specific needs.
  5. Community-Powered Innovation: Our vibrant community of users and contributors actively helps us build the best-in-class solution, fostering innovation and collaboration every step of the way.

How would you describe your primary audience?

BoxyHQ's answer:

BoxyHQ's primary audience encompasses:

  1. Developers crafting innovative solutions seeking enterprise-ready software products.
  2. B2B SaaS companies striving for compliance to meet corporate and industry regulatory standards.
  3. Large enterprises navigating the integration complexities between their Identity Providers (IdPs) and ensuring their applications adhere to rigorous security and infosec standards.

What's the story behind your product?

BoxyHQ's answer:

The inception of BoxyHQ is deeply linked with Deepak's journey as the former CTO of a cybersecurity scaleup. In his role, Deepak wrestled with the challenge of allocating resources to enterprise compliance features that diverged from their core value proposition. Alongside Sama, they witnessed the escalating tide of cyber crimes, compounded by the concerning statistic that around 70% of development teams often bypass essential security measures due to time constraints. Motivated by this shared purpose of bringing security earlier in the developer live cycle, they embarked on a mission to address these challenges head-on. BoxyHQ emerged as a solution designed to automate product security and provide low-code APIs for seamless integration, empowering developers to implement enterprise-compliant security measures effortlessly. Through BoxyHQ, Deepak and the team strive to alleviate the burden on development teams while fortifying organizations against the escalating threats posed by cyber crimes.

Who are some of the biggest customers of your product?

BoxyHQ's answer:

We value the confidentiality of our large enterprise clients due to NDA agreements. However, some of our notable customers include Cal.com, Dub, Supademo, Spike, among many others.

Which are the primary technologies used for building your product?

BoxyHQ's answer:

BoxyHQ uses the following technologies: - Next.js - PostgreSQL - Docker - Kubernetes

User comments

Share your experience with using Packer and BoxyHQ. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Packer and BoxyHQ

Packer Reviews

Introduction to Top Open Source Virtualization Tools
Packer is notably light, high performing, and operates on every major operating system. It assembles and configures all the necessary components for a virtual machine then creates images that run on multiple platforms. Packer doesn’t replace configuration management tools like Puppet or Chef; as a matter of fact, when creating images, Packer can utilize tools like Puppet or...

BoxyHQ Reviews

We have no reviews of BoxyHQ yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Packer seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 9 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Packer mentions (9)

  • Failed to connect to the host via SSH on Ubuntu 22.04
    If you have just upgraded to Ubuntu 22.04, and you suddenly experience either errors when trying to ssh into hosts, or when running ansible or again when running the ansible provisioner building a packer image, this is probably going to be useful for you. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
  • Create a minimalist OS using Docker Containers and Hashicorp Packer
    I am already using Hashicorp Packer at work and for personal projects and I wanted to test This idea out by wrapping it a single Packer Template file. This reduces the level of maintaining a lot of small scripts, Dockerfiles and configurations and the user can simply trigger a couple of Commands to get a minimalist OS at the end of the process. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
  • After self-hosting my email for twenty-three years I have thrown in the towel. The oligopoly has won.
    And while it is a slight increase in complexity, it can be an overall net gain in functionality, configurability and reliability. Much like Packer is far more reliable and practical than manually making VM images sitting in front of a terminal, even though making the initial configuration takes some time. Source: over 1 year ago
  • Customized Ubuntu Images using Packer + QEMU + Cloud-Init & UEFI bootloading
    Hashicorp Packer provides a nice wrapper / abstraction over the QEMU in order to boot the image and use it to set it up on first-boot. Instead of writing really long commands in order to boot up the image using QEMU, Packer provided a nice Configuration Template in a more Readable fashion. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
  • The journey of sharing a wired USB printer over the network
    Packer seemed like the perfect tool for the job. I have never used it before and wanted to get familiar with the tool. It doesn't come with ARM support out of the box, but there are two community projects to fill that niche. - Source: dev.to / about 2 years ago
View more

BoxyHQ mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of BoxyHQ yet. Tracking of BoxyHQ recommendations started around Mar 2023.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Packer and BoxyHQ, you can also consider the following products

Terraform - Tool for building, changing, and versioning infrastructure safely and efficiently.

Auth0 - Auth0 is a program for people to get authentication and authorization services for their own business use.

Rancher - Open Source Platform for Running a Private Container Service

Skyflow - Skyflow’s data privacy vaults deliver security, compliance and governance via a simple API

Puppet Enterprise - Get started with Puppet Enterprise, or upgrade or expand.

Keycloak - Open Source Identity and Access Management for modern Applications and Services.