Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Packer VS Ansible tower

Compare Packer VS Ansible tower and see what are their differences

Packer logo Packer

Packer is an open-source software for creating identical machine images from a single source configuration.

Ansible tower logo Ansible tower

An ansible web frontend.
  • Packer Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-15
  • Ansible tower Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-08-01

Packer features and specs

  • Multi-Provider Support
    Packer supports a wide variety of providers such as AWS, Azure, Google Cloud, VMware, and more. This allows for flexibility and the ability to create machine images across different environments.
  • Automation
    Packer automates the creation of machine images, eliminating the need for manual image configuration and reducing the potential for human error.
  • Script Reusability
    Packer allows for the reuse of scripts and configuration files, enabling a consistent and repeatable process for image creation.
  • Parallel Builds
    Packer can build multiple images in parallel, which can significantly speed up the provisioning process.
  • Idempotency
    Packer ensures that the output machine image is always an identical result given the same input configuration, reducing the risk of inconsistencies.

Possible disadvantages of Packer

  • Steep Learning Curve
    The variety of features and flexibility that Packer offers can make it complex and challenging to learn, especially for beginners.
  • Limited Debugging Tools
    Packer's debugging tools are not as mature or as integrated as those found in some other DevOps tools, making troubleshooting more difficult.
  • Configuration Complexity
    Complex configurations with multiple builders and provisioners can become hard to manage and maintain, leading to potential errors.
  • No State Management
    Unlike Terraform, Packer does not manage state, which means users need to handle state management separately if required.
  • Dependency on External Tools
    Packer often relies on external scripts and tools for provisioning, which can introduce additional dependencies and complexities.

Ansible tower features and specs

  • Centralized Management
    Ansible Tower provides a centralized point of control for managing and executing Ansible playbooks, making it easier to oversee complex automation workflows across multiple nodes.
  • Role-Based Access Control
    It offers role-based access control to ensure that only authorized users can execute playbooks or access certain functionalities, improving security and compliance.
  • Job Scheduling
    Tower includes the ability to schedule job runs, allowing for automation tasks to be planned and executed at predefined times without manual intervention.
  • Graphical User Interface
    Provides a user-friendly web interface, which simplifies the process of using Ansible for users who may not be comfortable with command-line interactions.
  • Integrated Notifications
    Users can configure notifications to be sent through various channels like email or Slack upon completion or failure of jobs, enabling real-time monitoring.

Possible disadvantages of Ansible tower

  • Cost
    Ansible Tower is a paid product, which can be a significant factor for smaller organizations or individual users compared to free open-source Ansible.
  • Complexity
    Setting up and managing Tower can add complexity to an environment, particularly for organizations that are new to Ansible or do not require advanced features.
  • Resource Overhead
    Running Ansible Tower introduces additional resource and operational overhead, which may require more powerful hardware and infrastructure management.
  • Limited Offline Capabilities
    Ansible Tower's functionality is heavily reliant on being online, which can be a limitation for environments that require significant offline capabilities.
  • Learning Curve
    Users accustomed to direct Ansible command-line operations might need time to adapt to Tower's interface and workflow, which can slow down initial productivity.

Analysis of Packer

Overall verdict

  • Packer is a valuable tool for organizations looking to streamline their image building process and maintain consistency across different environments. Its flexibility and wide range of features make it a strong asset in infrastructure automation and DevOps pipelines.

Why this product is good

  • Packer is considered a good tool because it automates the creation of machine images for multiple platforms from a single source configuration. This efficiency reduces errors and speeds up the deployment process. Packer is highly versatile and integrates well with various configuration management tools, broadening its applicability across different environments. It also supports multiple cloud providers, making it a great choice for multi-cloud strategies.

Recommended for

  • DevOps teams
  • Cloud infrastructure engineers
  • Organizations using multi-cloud strategies
  • Teams seeking automated and consistent image building processes
  • Developers looking to integrate infrastructure as code practices

Packer videos

No Packer videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Ansible tower videos

Red Hat Ansible Tower Demo

More videos:

  • Review - Red Hat Ansible Tower: Simplicity, Security, Stability

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Packer and Ansible tower)
DevOps Tools
86 86%
14% 14
Continuous Integration And Delivery
Continuous Integration
0 0%
100% 100
Other Infrastructure Tools

User comments

Share your experience with using Packer and Ansible tower. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Packer and Ansible tower

Packer Reviews

Introduction to Top Open Source Virtualization Tools
Packer is notably light, high performing, and operates on every major operating system. It assembles and configures all the necessary components for a virtual machine then creates images that run on multiple platforms. Packer doesn’t replace configuration management tools like Puppet or Chef; as a matter of fact, when creating images, Packer can utilize tools like Puppet or...

Ansible tower Reviews

12 Open Source/Commercial Software for Data Center Infrastructure Management
Thanks to that Ansible Tower can perform almost any possible program operation with integrated software and has an amazing statistics collecting module. On the dark side, we have a lack of integration with popular billing systems and pricing.
Source: www.tecmint.com

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Packer seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 9 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Packer mentions (9)

  • Failed to connect to the host via SSH on Ubuntu 22.04
    If you have just upgraded to Ubuntu 22.04, and you suddenly experience either errors when trying to ssh into hosts, or when running ansible or again when running the ansible provisioner building a packer image, this is probably going to be useful for you. - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
  • Create a minimalist OS using Docker Containers and Hashicorp Packer
    I am already using Hashicorp Packer at work and for personal projects and I wanted to test This idea out by wrapping it a single Packer Template file. This reduces the level of maintaining a lot of small scripts, Dockerfiles and configurations and the user can simply trigger a couple of Commands to get a minimalist OS at the end of the process. - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
  • After self-hosting my email for twenty-three years I have thrown in the towel. The oligopoly has won.
    And while it is a slight increase in complexity, it can be an overall net gain in functionality, configurability and reliability. Much like Packer is far more reliable and practical than manually making VM images sitting in front of a terminal, even though making the initial configuration takes some time. Source: over 2 years ago
  • Customized Ubuntu Images using Packer + QEMU + Cloud-Init & UEFI bootloading
    Hashicorp Packer provides a nice wrapper / abstraction over the QEMU in order to boot the image and use it to set it up on first-boot. Instead of writing really long commands in order to boot up the image using QEMU, Packer provided a nice Configuration Template in a more Readable fashion. - Source: dev.to / almost 3 years ago
  • The journey of sharing a wired USB printer over the network
    Packer seemed like the perfect tool for the job. I have never used it before and wanted to get familiar with the tool. It doesn't come with ARM support out of the box, but there are two community projects to fill that niche. - Source: dev.to / about 3 years ago
View more

Ansible tower mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Ansible tower yet. Tracking of Ansible tower recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Packer and Ansible tower, you can also consider the following products

Terraform - Tool for building, changing, and versioning infrastructure safely and efficiently.

Ansible Semaphore - Modern UI for Ansible

Puppet Enterprise - Get started with Puppet Enterprise, or upgrade or expand.

Specops Deploy - Specops Deploy is the name of an advanced deployment program that simplifies the installation of the software and applications in addition to the multiple operating systems.

Rancher - Open Source Platform for Running a Private Container Service

Jenkins - Jenkins is an open-source continuous integration server with 300+ plugins to support all kinds of software development