Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Ox editor VS JOE

Compare Ox editor VS JOE and see what are their differences

LibHunt
LibHunt tracks mentions of software libraries on relevant social networks. Based on that data, you can find the most popular projects and their alternatives. featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

Ox editor logo Ox editor

An independent Rust text editor that runs in your terminal.

JOE logo JOE

JOE is a full featured terminal-based screen editor which is distributed under the GNU General...
  • Ox editor Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-01
  • JOE Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-10-01

Ox editor features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

JOE features and specs

  • Lightweight
    JOE is a lightweight text editor that doesn't consume much system resources, making it ideal for use on older hardware or systems with limited resources.
  • User-Friendly Interface
    The interface of JOE is relatively simple and familiar to users of classic text editors, which makes it easy to navigate without a steep learning curve.
  • Highly Configurable
    JOE offers extensive configuration options, allowing users to customize the editor according to their preferences and needs.
  • Keyboard Shortcuts
    The editor supports numerous keyboard shortcuts that help streamline tasks and enhance productivity for experienced users.
  • Support for Multiple File Types
    JOE can handle a variety of file types, making it versatile for different types of projects and use cases.

Possible disadvantages of JOE

  • Limited Advanced Features
    Compared to more modern editors, JOE lacks some of the advanced features and integrations that power users might expect, such as built-in code linting or version control system integration.
  • Steeper Learning Curve for Non-Traditional Users
    Users who are not familiar with command-line interfaces or text editors that rely heavily on keyboard shortcuts might find JOE difficult to learn and use effectively.
  • Less Community Support
    JOE does not have as large a user community as some other text editors, which means less community-driven plugins and extensions, as well as fewer resources for troubleshooting.
  • No Graphical User Interface
    As a terminal-based text editor, JOE does not offer a graphical user interface, which may not appeal to those who prefer more visually-oriented text editors.

Ox editor videos

No Ox editor videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

JOE videos

+ Add

Joe - Movie Review

More videos:

  • Review - Joe Movie Review (Schmoes Know)
  • Review - Barstool Pizza Review - Joe & Pat's Pizzeria

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Ox editor and JOE)

Ox editor

JOE

Software Development
37 37%
Software Development
63% 63
Text Editors
32 32%
Text Editors
68% 68
IDE
32 32%
IDE
68% 68
IDEs And Text Editors
50 50%
IDEs And Text Editors
50% 50

User comments

Share your experience with using Ox editor and JOE. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, JOE seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 17 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Ox editor mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Ox editor yet. Tracking of Ox editor recommendations started around Mar 2022.

JOE mentions (17)

  • Microsoft 365 Copilot launch was a total disaster
    Allow me to introduce you to WordStar, in the "modern" context of Joe's Own Editor. https://gizmodo.com/sci-fi-writer-releases-free-archive-of-legendary-word-processor-used-by-george-rr-martin-2000484618 https://joe-editor.sourceforge.io/ https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joe%27s_Own_Editor. - Source: Hacker News / 4 months ago
  • WordStar – A Writer's Word Processor (1990)
    The Joe editor has "jstar" where if you invoke the editor as this command it loads the Wordstar keymapping and looks/operates with the WordStar keybindings and screen interface. https://joe-editor.sourceforge.io/. - Source: Hacker News / 11 months ago
  • Ask HN: Interesting TUIs (text user interfaces), maybe forgotten ones?
    > Unlike emacs or vim or even nano, it didn't have a bunch of invisible shortcut keys, just a Windows-like drop-down menu system (but rendered in DOS). You might like "joe", which was inspired by WordStar: . - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
  • WordStar: Arrogant, Difficult, Powerful (2022)
    I actually have a bound set for WordStar 4. If you want to use something similar on modern systems, try "Joe's Own Editor." https://joe-editor.sourceforge.io/. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
  • Micro – A Modern Alternative to Nano
    JOE is pretty nice https://joe-editor.sourceforge.io/ — a hybrid of WordStar and Emacs, and if you run it with `jstar` you get a pretty authentic WordStar experience which also reminds of the earliest Borland Turbo IDEs. - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Ox editor and JOE, you can also consider the following products

Vim - Highly configurable text editor built to enable efficient text editing

Micro - Modern terminal-based text editor

GNU nano - GNU nano is a small and friendly text editor.

WordGrinder - WordGrinder is a word processor for processing words. It is not WYSIWYG. It is not point and click.

Sublime Text - Sublime Text is a sophisticated text editor for code, html and prose - any kind of text file. You'll love the slick user interface and extraordinary features. Fully customizable with macros, and syntax highlighting for most major languages.

Notepad++ - A free source code editor which supports several programming languages running under the MS Windows environment.

Loading...