Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

OWASP Dependency-Track VS Kubescape

Compare OWASP Dependency-Track VS Kubescape and see what are their differences

OWASP Dependency-Track logo OWASP Dependency-Track

OWASP Dependency-Track is an intelligent Software Composition Analysis (SCA) platform that allows...

Kubescape logo Kubescape

Kubernetes security made for developers
  • OWASP Dependency-Track Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-02-03
  • Kubescape Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-08-05

OWASP Dependency-Track features and specs

  • Proactive Vulnerability Management
    Dependency-Track allows organizations to proactively identify and mitigate vulnerabilities in their software dependencies. By continuously monitoring and analyzing the components in use, it helps in preventing potential security breaches before they are exploited.
  • Comprehensive Reporting and Analytics
    The tool provides detailed reports and analytics on the security status of an organization's dependencies. This aids in tracking the risk profile over time, making informed decisions, and prioritizing remediation efforts effectively.
  • Integration with CI/CD Pipelines
    Dependency-Track can be seamlessly integrated into continuous integration and continuous deployment (CI/CD) pipelines, ensuring that dependencies are automatically assessed for vulnerabilities as part of the software development lifecycle, enhancing security without disrupting development processes.
  • Support for Multiple Package Ecosystems
    Offering support for a wide range of package ecosystems, Dependency-Track can analyze components from various sources, making it versatile and applicable to a broad spectrum of technology stacks used by different organizations.
  • Open Source and Community-Driven
    Being an open-source project, Dependency-Track benefits from community contributions, which enhances its features, security, and reliability over time. It allows users to customize and adapt the tool according to their specific requirements.

Possible disadvantages of OWASP Dependency-Track

  • Complex Setup and Configuration
    The initial setup and configuration of Dependency-Track can be complex and time-consuming, especially for organizations that are new to vulnerability management tools. It may require a steep learning curve for effective use.
  • Resource Intensive
    Running Dependency-Track, particularly in an enterprise environment with many projects and dependencies, can be resource-intensive, requiring significant computational power and storage, which may result in increased operational costs.
  • False Positives and Negatives
    Like many automated security tools, Dependency-Track may occasionally report false positives or fail to identify certain vulnerabilities (false negatives). This necessitates manual verification, which can be time-consuming and might require additional expertise.
  • Dependence on External Data Sources
    Dependency-Track relies on external vulnerability databases and data sources for its analyses (such as the National Vulnerability Database). Any inaccuracies or updates to these data sources can directly affect the accuracy of its vulnerability assessments.
  • Limited Offline Capabilities
    The tool's functionality is somewhat limited in offline environments because it needs access to external vulnerability databases for the most current information, which can restrict its usage in isolated networks or environments with strict internet usage policies.

Kubescape features and specs

  • Open Source
    Kubescape is open-source software, which allows for community collaboration, transparency, and customization to fit various use cases.
  • Comprehensive Security Checks
    It offers a wide range of security checks for Kubernetes environments, helping to ensure clusters are configured securely.
  • Aligns with Best Practices
    Kubescape is designed to align with security frameworks like NSA-CISA and MITRE ATT&CK, ensuring adherence to widely accepted security practices.
  • Ease of Use
    The tool is known for its user-friendly interface, making it easier for users to deploy and manage without extensive expertise.
  • Continuous Improvement
    Being open-source, Kubescape benefits from continuous contributions and updates from the community, leading to regular improvements and patches.

Possible disadvantages of Kubescape

  • Limited Scope
    While it covers a wide range of security checks, it may not address all specific enterprise security needs, requiring additional tools and solutions.
  • Community Support
    Support is largely community-driven, which might not be as immediate or comprehensive as commercial options with dedicated support teams.
  • Potential Complexity
    For users who are not familiar with Kubernetes or security best practices, the plethora of options and configurations might be overwhelming.
  • Resource Intensive
    Running comprehensive checks can be resource-intensive, potentially impacting performance if not managed correctly.
  • Dependency Management
    As with many open-source tools, managing dependencies and integrations with other systems or tools can be challenging, requiring careful handling.

Analysis of OWASP Dependency-Track

Overall verdict

  • OWASP Dependency-Track is a highly recommended tool for organizations that prioritize security in their software development lifecycle. Its comprehensive features and community-driven nature make it an excellent choice for managing dependencies and vulnerabilities effectively.

Why this product is good

  • OWASP Dependency-Track is a powerful and popular tool designed for managing and mitigating risks associated with the use of third-party and open-source components in your software projects. It excels in identifying and tracking vulnerabilities, helping organizations maintain secure software practices. The platform is highly regarded for its integration capabilities with CI/CD pipelines, detailed reporting, and support for multiple languages and ecosystems. Being an open-source project, it benefits from community feedback and contributions, which enhances its adaptability and overall reliability.

Recommended for

    OWASP Dependency-Track is ideal for security-conscious development teams, DevSecOps professionals, and organizations with a strong focus on application security. It is particularly beneficial for those using a wide array of open-source components who need to ensure ongoing compliance with security standards.

OWASP Dependency-Track videos

No OWASP Dependency-Track videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Kubescape videos

How To Secure Kubernetes Clusters With Kubescape And Armo

More videos:

  • Review - Kubescape and the NSA hardening guide (v1.03)
  • Review - Kubescape walkthrough - Easy Kubernetes security tool

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to OWASP Dependency-Track and Kubescape)
Security
100 100%
0% 0
Developer Tools
0 0%
100% 100
Open Source
100 100%
0% 0
Cloud Computing
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using OWASP Dependency-Track and Kubescape. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, OWASP Dependency-Track should be more popular than Kubescape. It has been mentiond 19 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

OWASP Dependency-Track mentions (19)

  • Show HN: Pre-alpha tool for analyzing spdx SBOMs generated by GitHub
    I've become interested in SBOM recently, and found there were great tools like https://dependencytrack.org/ for CycloneDX SBOMs, but all I have is SPDX SBOMs generated by GitHub. I decided to have a go at writing my own dependency track esque tool aiming to integrate with the APIs GitHub provides. It's pretty limited in functionality so far, but can give a high level summary of the types of licenses your... - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
  • SQL Injection Isn't Dead Yet
    To detect these types of vulnerabilities, we should first and foremost know our dependencies and versions, and which of them have vulnerabilities. The OWASP Top 10 2021 identifies this need as A06:2021-Vulnerable and Outdated Components. OWASP has several tools for this, including Dependency Check and Dependency Track. These tools will warn about the use of components with vulnerabilities. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
  • Krita fund has 0 corporate support
    Https://dependencytrack.org/ You just need to use one of the various tools out there to scan. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
  • Friends - needs help choosing solution for SBOM vulnerability
    OWASP Dependency Track - https://dependencytrack.org/. Source: about 2 years ago
  • software inventory of my ECS tasks
    I actually want to build the same thing you are after, and I think I’ll go for the setup you describe in idea 2. The tool you can use for this is Trivy (https://trivy.dev), have it generate a SBOM and send it to Dependencytrack (https://dependencytrack.org). Source: over 2 years ago
View more

Kubescape mentions (9)

  • Cloud Security and Resilience: DevSecOps Tools and Practices
    1. Kubescape: https://github.com/kubescape/kubescape Kubescape is the first tool for testing if Kubernetes clusters are deployed securely as defined in Kubernetes Hardening Guidance by NSA and CISA. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
  • 10 Ways for Kubernetes Declarative Configuration Management
    Kustomize: It provides a solution to customize the Kubernetes resource base configuration and differential configuration without template and DSL. It does not solve the constraint problem itself, but needs to cooperate with a large number of additional tools to check constraints, such as Kube-linter, Checkov and kubescape. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
  • Kubescape 3.0 is available to enhance your K8s security experience
    Kubescape is the first Kubernetes security scanner that was accepted to the cloud native computing foundation. Kubescape 3.0 is a major release that extended the functionality of the original misconfiguration scanner to include vulnerabilities and usabillty improvements. If you are interested in an overview, feel free to check out the blog post. To dive straight into the code check out the repo. I'd love it... - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
  • I want to contribute to open-source software written in Go
    Hi! Take a look over our project: https://github.com/kubescape/kubescape New contributors al always welcome! P.S. Tomorrow we are going to have the community meeting: https://github.com/kubescape/kubescape#community. Feel free to join and say hi :). Source: about 2 years ago
  • Open Source Project Contribution
    New contributors are always welcome :) Https://github.com/kubescape/kubescape. Source: about 2 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing OWASP Dependency-Track and Kubescape, you can also consider the following products

Snyk - Snyk helps you use open source and stay secure. Continuously find and fix vulnerabilities for npm, Maven, NuGet, RubyGems, PyPI and much more.

Patchstack - Monitor all your WordPress sites for security vulnerabilities found by our community of ethical hackers.

FOSSA - Open source license compliance and dependency analysis

Trustpage - Building trust with customers just got easier

WhiteSource - Find & fix security and compliance issues in open source libraries in real-time.

The Security Checklist - The Practical Security Checklist for Web Developers