OSS Commit VS GitHub Repository Size

OSS Commit

2022 is about to begin, and most of us have already started planning our goals.

GitHub Repository Size

Browser extension to show file and repo size in GitHub

Landing page //
2023-09-24

Landing page //
2023-10-01

OSS Commit features and specs

Community Collaboration
OSS Commit, being open-source, allows for community contributions, which can lead to rapid improvements and diverse input from developers worldwide.
Transparency
The open-source nature of OSS Commit ensures transparency, allowing users to inspect and understand the code, which can enhance trust and security.
Cost Efficiency
Since OSS Commit is open-source, it can be used without licensing fees, making it cost-effective for both individual developers and organizations.
Customizability
Users can modify and adapt OSS Commit to fit their specific needs, thanks to its open codebase.

Possible disadvantages of OSS Commit

Maintenance Overhead
Open-source projects like OSS Commit may lack dedicated support, placing the onus on users to resolve issues, which can be resource-intensive.
Security Risks
Being open-source means the code is publicly accessible, potentially exposing vulnerabilities if not regularly audited and maintained.
Feature Limitations
OSS Commit may not have all the features of a proprietary software equivalent and relies on community contribution for enhancements.
Documentation Challenges
Open-source projects sometimes suffer from incomplete or outdated documentation, which can hinder new users' ability to effectively use the software.

GitHub Repository Size features and specs

Ease of Use
The GitHub Repository Size extension provides a simple and intuitive way to view the size of a repository right from the GitHub interface, making it easy for users to gauge the space usage without additional tools.
Integration
Seamlessly integrates with GitHub's user interface, adding size information directly to the repository's page, which helps in quick access to information without navigating away from the platform.
Open Source
Being open source, users can inspect, customize, and improve the code according to their needs, fostering a collaborative improvement of the tool.

Possible disadvantages of GitHub Repository Size

Browser Dependency
The tool requires installation as a browser extension, which may not be available or function equally well across all browsers and platforms.
Limited Functionality
Primarily provides only the size of repositories, lacking more advanced features like analyzing space by file type or contributions, which might be necessary for comprehensive project management.
Maintenance and Support
Being a third-party tool, it may not receive regular updates or support, potentially leading to compatibility issues with updates in GitHub's interface.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to OSS Commit and GitHub Repository Size)

GitHub Repository Size

Developer Tools

31 31%

Developer Tools

69% 69

Web App

100 100%

Web App

0% 0

Productivity

0 0%

Productivity

100% 100

GitHub

52 52%

GitHub

48% 48

User comments

Share your experience with using OSS Commit and GitHub Repository Size. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, GitHub Repository Size seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 1 time since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

OSS Commit mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of OSS Commit yet. Tracking of OSS Commit recommendations started around Dec 2021.

GitHub Repository Size mentions (1)

Is the Github folder on your disk supposed to take up a lot of space?
There's also a chrome extension. Haven't used it though, so can't verify it. Source: about 3 years ago