Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

OpenSSL VS Apache OpenWhisk

Compare OpenSSL VS Apache OpenWhisk and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

OpenSSL logo OpenSSL

OpenSSL is a free and open source software cryptography library that implements both the Secure Sockets Layer (SSL) and the Transport Layer Security (TLS) protocols, which are primarily used to provide secure communications between web browsers and …

Apache OpenWhisk logo Apache OpenWhisk

Serverless / Task Processing
  • OpenSSL Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-14
  • Apache OpenWhisk Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-10-18

OpenSSL features and specs

  • Open Source
    OpenSSL is open-source software, which means it is freely available and can be reviewed, modified, and improved by anyone.
  • Widely Used
    OpenSSL is one of the most widely used libraries for SSL and TLS protocols, ensuring high compatibility and support across different platforms and applications.
  • Comprehensive Documentation
    OpenSSL provides extensive documentation and resources that can help users understand and implement its features effectively.
  • Regular Updates
    The OpenSSL project is actively maintained, receiving regular updates and patches to address security vulnerabilities and improve functionality.
  • Community Support
    A large community of developers and users contribute to forums, mailing lists, and other discussion platforms, providing support and sharing knowledge.
  • Flexible and Powerful
    OpenSSL offers a wide range of cryptographic functions and protocols, making it a versatile tool for various security requirements.

Possible disadvantages of OpenSSL

  • Complexity
    OpenSSL can be complex to configure and use, particularly for beginners or those without a deep understanding of cryptographic principles.
  • Security Vulnerabilities
    Despite regular updates, OpenSSL has had several high-profile security vulnerabilities in the past, such as Heartbleed, which can have broad implications.
  • Performance Overhead
    Depending on the implementation and configuration, using OpenSSL can introduce performance overhead, impacting the speed and efficiency of applications.
  • Limited User-Friendly Tools
    While OpenSSL is powerful, it lacks user-friendly tools and interfaces, making it harder for less technical users to operate.
  • Documentation Quality
    Though comprehensive, some users find the OpenSSL documentation to be dense and difficult to navigate, which can make troubleshooting and implementation challenging.

Apache OpenWhisk features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

Analysis of OpenSSL

Overall verdict

  • Yes, OpenSSL is generally considered a reliable and secure option for secure communications. However, like any software, it requires proper configuration and regular updates to maintain its security posture.

Why this product is good

  • OpenSSL is an open-source cryptographic library widely used for implementing secure communications over networks using the SSL and TLS protocols. It is considered good because of its extensive feature set, constant updates, and widespread adoption across different platforms. The project benefits from a large community of contributors who regularly update and patch the software, ensuring it stays secure and robust.

Recommended for

  • Web servers requiring SSL/TLS support for secure HTTP (HTTPS) connections
  • Developers needing cryptographic functions for applications
  • Embedded systems requiring small footprint security solutions
  • Network applications that require secure data transmission

OpenSSL videos

Das Kommando "enc" in OpenSSL

More videos:

  • Review - OpenSSL and FIPS... They Are Back Together!
  • Review - OpenSSL After Heartbleed by Rich Salz & Tim Hudson, OpenSSL

Apache OpenWhisk videos

A Tour of the New Apache OpenWhisk Incubator Project and Its Numerous Repositories - Matt Rutkowski

More videos:

  • Review - 2018-05-23 Apache OpenWhisk Tech Interchange - Web Meeting
  • Review - 2018-06-20 Apache OpenWhisk Tech Interchange - Zoom Meeting

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to OpenSSL and Apache OpenWhisk)
Development Tools
100 100%
0% 0
Cloud Computing
0 0%
100% 100
Javascript UI Libraries
100 100%
0% 0
Cloud Hosting
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using OpenSSL and Apache OpenWhisk. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Apache OpenWhisk should be more popular than OpenSSL. It has been mentiond 7 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

OpenSSL mentions (2)

  • Why does Baserow need my personal data so I can run open source?
    Baserow uses open source like https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OpenSSL and can use it without handing over data to openssl.org. Source: over 2 years ago
  • Creating private key help
    Noob here; I'm looking at openssl.org Two commands are listed; "openssl-genrsa" and "openssl genrsa" (No hyphen). Source: over 3 years ago

Apache OpenWhisk mentions (7)

  • The 2024 Web Hosting Report
    Serverless functions are now offered by many cloud providers, as well as having options like OpenFaaS, Knative, Apache's Openwhisk and more from the open source community that run in environments ranging from one server all the way up to globally replicated private clusters. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
  • My first serverless function on DigitalOcean
    The serverless functions with Digital Ocean are based on Apache Open Whisk, so the service has additional name space, which need to go into the URL. - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago
  • run a RestAPI on Every container?
    The two biggest options are OpenWhisk and OpenFaas. Check out /r/serverless for more options. I'm experimenting currently with OpenFaas as it's the lighter weigh to of the two. Source: over 2 years ago
  • which is best open source alternative to lamda
    If you meant lambda for cloud functions provided by Amazon then this is open source and free, as long as you host it yourself: https://openwhisk.apache.org/. Source: almost 3 years ago
  • Orchestrator self hosted
    Not necessarily an orchestrator, but you could take a look at https://openwhisk.apache.org/ it's like AWS Lambdas but for kubernetes (and open shift if you swing that way). Haven't used it personally, but the reading I've done on it suggests you could probably use it for this. Source: about 3 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing OpenSSL and Apache OpenWhisk, you can also consider the following products

jQuery - The Write Less, Do More, JavaScript Library.

Dkron - Easy, Reliable Cron jobs A distributed Cron service with, API, no SPOF and an easy to use dashboard.

React Native - A framework for building native apps with React

Lambada Framework - Build serverless REST API's with JAVA. It implements the JAX-RS API and deploys your application easily to AWS Lambda and API Gateway - cagataygurturk/lambadaframework

Babel - Babel is a compiler for writing next generation JavaScript.

Knative - Knative provides a set of components for building modern, source-centric, and container-based applications that can run anywhere.