Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

OpenSSH VS McAfee Vulnerability Manager for Databases

Compare OpenSSH VS McAfee Vulnerability Manager for Databases and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

OpenSSH logo OpenSSH

OpenSSH is a free version of the SSH connectivity tools that technical users rely on.

McAfee Vulnerability Manager for Databases logo McAfee Vulnerability Manager for Databases

McAfee Vulnerability Manager for Databases conducts more than 4,700 vulnerability checks against leading database systems such as Oracle, Microsoft SQL Server, IBM DB2, and MySQL.
  • OpenSSH Landing page
    Landing page //
    2018-09-29
  • McAfee Vulnerability Manager for Databases Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-08-20

OpenSSH features and specs

  • Security
    OpenSSH provides secure encrypted communications between two untrusted hosts over an insecure network, offering strong encryption standards and authentication mechanisms.
  • Open Source
    As an open-source project, OpenSSH is free to use and benefits from contributions and transparency from a wide community of developers and users.
  • Portability
    OpenSSH is highly portable and available across many operating systems, including Linux, macOS, and Windows, making it a versatile tool for different environments.
  • Rich Feature Set
    In addition to basic SSH functionality, OpenSSH includes features like secure file transfer (SFTP and SCP), tunneling, forwarding, and key management.
  • Strong Community Support
    OpenSSH benefits from extensive community and developer support, ensuring regular updates, patches, and a wealth of documentation and user discussions.

Possible disadvantages of OpenSSH

  • Complexity
    Configuring and managing OpenSSH can be complex, especially for beginners, and requires a good understanding of security principles and SSH protocols.
  • Performance Overhead
    Encryption and decryption processes can introduce performance overhead, which can be a concern in environments with high traffic or limited resources.
  • Dependency on Proper Configuration
    The security of OpenSSH heavily depends on proper configuration; misconfigurations can lead to vulnerabilities, defeating the purpose of using a secure protocol.
  • Limited GUI Tools
    OpenSSH primarily operates via command-line interface (CLI), which may not be as user-friendly as graphical user interface (GUI) tools for some users.
  • Compatibility Issues
    While OpenSSH is highly portable, there can be compatibility issues with certain legacy systems or non-standard SSH implementations.

McAfee Vulnerability Manager for Databases features and specs

  • Comprehensive Vulnerability Assessment
    McAfee Vulnerability Manager for Databases provides thorough scanning capabilities that identify and assess vulnerabilities across a wide range of database platforms, helping to ensure database security compliance.
  • Automated Risk Management
    The tool offers automated risk assessment features that facilitate quicker identification of potential database security risks, reducing the likelihood of security breaches.
  • Regulatory Compliance
    It includes capabilities for addressing compliance requirements by connecting vulnerability assessments with various regulatory standards like GDPR, PCI, and more, easing the compliance burden.
  • Customizable Reporting
    The solution provides customizable reports that give detailed insights into database vulnerabilities, allowing for better-informed decisions and prioritization of security efforts.

Possible disadvantages of McAfee Vulnerability Manager for Databases

  • Complex Setup
    The initial configuration and setup process can be complicated and time-consuming, requiring a certain level of expertise to effectively deploy and manage the solution.
  • Resource Intensive
    The tool may demand significant system resources during vulnerability scanning processes, potentially impacting the performance of other applications running on the same system.
  • Cost
    McAfee's solution can be expensive compared to other similar tools in the market, which may not be affordable for smaller businesses with limited budgets.
  • Dependency on McAfee Ecosystem
    Users who do not already use McAfee products may find integration within their existing infrastructure challenging, as the tool may work best within a fully McAfee-managed security environment.

OpenSSH videos

Ubuntu Server 18.04 Administration Guide Part 02 - Securing OpenSSH

More videos:

  • Review - Linux Commands for Beginners 22 - Remote Management with OpenSSH

McAfee Vulnerability Manager for Databases videos

No McAfee Vulnerability Manager for Databases videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to OpenSSH and McAfee Vulnerability Manager for Databases)
SSH
100 100%
0% 0
Monitoring Tools
0 0%
100% 100
Server Management
100 100%
0% 0
Cloud Storage
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using OpenSSH and McAfee Vulnerability Manager for Databases. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare OpenSSH and McAfee Vulnerability Manager for Databases

OpenSSH Reviews

Top 10 Best MobaXterm Alternatives for Windows, macOS & Linux In 2021
OpenSSH is a safe and secure alternative to tools like MobaXterm (for which the password flows in clear on the network), however it is much more than that considering that it likewise permits to release remote commands (like rsh, or remsh), but also to transfer whole files or directories (like rcp). OpenSSH is available in the form of a daemon and a customer, the daemon...
30 best PuTTY alternatives for SSH clients for 2020
OpenSSH is a widely-used open source free emulator for Windows, Mac OS, Linux, and iOS. It is protected by SSH and incorporates SCP and SFTP for file transfers.

McAfee Vulnerability Manager for Databases Reviews

We have no reviews of McAfee Vulnerability Manager for Databases yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, OpenSSH seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 1 time since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

OpenSSH mentions (1)

  • is ssh (OpenSSH) impacted by CVE-2022-3786 and CVE-2022-3602
    I haven't found a clear answer to this. After checking openssh.com I haven't found any mention. Source: over 2 years ago

McAfee Vulnerability Manager for Databases mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of McAfee Vulnerability Manager for Databases yet. Tracking of McAfee Vulnerability Manager for Databases recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing OpenSSH and McAfee Vulnerability Manager for Databases, you can also consider the following products

Symantec Data Loss Prevention - Fully protect your data with the comprehensive detection technologies and unified policies of Symantec's industry leading Data Loss Prevention (DLP).

Oracle Advanced Security - Stop would-be attackers and reduce risk of unauthorized data exposure with advanced security database technologies from Oracle. Together, encryption and redaction form the foundation of defense-in-depth, multilayered database security solutions.

Microsoft BitLocker - BitLocker is a full disk encryption feature included with Windows Vista and later.

DBHawk - Datasparc features DBHawk, online SQL Tools designed for Oracle, MS SQL Server and other databases.

Paubox - Paubox provides HIPAA compliant email encryption without the hassle of extra steps.

Imperva Data Protection - Secure your data from attacks and simplify regulatory compliance. Imperva data security protects what matters most for your business – your data.