OpenNext VS Stacktape

However, CT3A initialized the tRPC client to use new HTTP streaming features, which are still unstable. Moreover, streaming is still considered experimental with both OpenNEXT adapter (internal part of nextjs-web resource) and AWS Lambda (on which the Next.js app will run). - Source: dev.to / 21 days ago

No they don't, hence projects like https://open-next.js.org/ and the multitude of stories of 3rd party serverless offerings being half-broken. They also keep breaking at time goes on since they're playing catch up on the build output: https://www.reddit.com/r/nextjs/comments/1685dyr/avoid_aws_amplify_at_all_cost_its_fraud/ https://www.reddit.com/r/nextjs/comments/160ui01/is_aws_amplify_good_for_hosting_nextjs/... - Source: Hacker News / 6 months ago

The default refrain rears its head again. Next.js and Vercel heavily push serverless deployment: 13 reworked the built-in API support to leverage Web Standards, which discarded interop with the a much larger server ecosystem in order to enable better edge support. Serverless deploys require providers to support the Next.js Build API:... - Source: Hacker News / 7 months ago

I'm currently waiting SST v2 to be released where they will use https://open-next.js.org instead of https://github.com/serverless-nextjs/serverless-next.js. Source: over 1 year ago

However you might like to look at https://open-next.js.org or https://sst.dev. Source: over 1 year ago

From what I've heard, the biggest selling point of GCP is its simplicity and easier development experience. Other than that, it's mostly inferior to AWS or even MS Azure. AWS is designed to be very flexible and configurable (example: look at IAM). The tradeof is the complexity and amount of work required to set up even the most frequently used services (such as ECS Fargate or Lambda). That being said, if somebody... - Source: Hacker News / 11 months ago

Hello, you could also have a look at https://stacktape.com. (I'm a founder) . It offers a very simple deployment experience for your apps (so that any developer can deploy his/her app on their own). It's basically as simple as a PaaS platform, yet offers the full power and flexibility of AWS. Source: 11 months ago

(Please take my opinion with a grain of salt, as I might be biased - I'm a founder at a startup that solves a very similar problem). The cloud (and by "cloud" I mostly mean AWS) in general is indeed insanely complex. Not only is it complex and hard to use for dedicated and trained DevOps/Cloud experts, it's even more overwhelming for developers wanting to just deploy their simple apps. This statement is in my... - Source: Hacker News / 12 months ago

Yeah, I second this. You can also use a tool like Stacktape - for use cases like this, it is completely free(full disclosure I am developer there). You can easily deploy into your AWS account and leverage Free Tier. It could probably even simplify other parts of your setup such as S3 hosting. Source: 12 months ago

I agree with some of the points you've mentioned, but I also think that there definitely are great use-cases for AWS Lambda, and that they are (especially when using a good deployment tool) a great option for many different types of applications. The biggest problem is that the computing model, or the architecture that is commonly required for this sort of apps (event-driven and asynchronous) is hard to develop,... - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago