Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

OpenDesign.dev VS Material Design for Angular

Compare OpenDesign.dev VS Material Design for Angular and see what are their differences

OpenDesign.dev logo OpenDesign.dev

Read and display data from designs, using code

Material Design for Angular logo Material Design for Angular

Material Design for AngularJS Apps
  • OpenDesign.dev Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-09-15
  • Material Design for Angular Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-07

OpenDesign.dev features and specs

  • Open Source
    OpenDesign.dev is open source, allowing users to customize and contribute to the codebase, fostering a collaborative environment.
  • Community-Driven
    The platform is community-driven, which can lead to innovative features and quicker updates based on user feedback.
  • Cost-Effective
    Being an open-source platform, it can be more affordable than proprietary software, reducing license and subscription costs.
  • Interoperability
    OpenDesign.dev promotes interoperability with other tools, enhancing workflow efficiency by supporting various design formats.

Possible disadvantages of OpenDesign.dev

  • Limited Support
    As an open-source project, it may lack dedicated support, requiring users to rely on community forums for help.
  • Development Resources
    The platform might face limitations in development resources, which can affect the pace of new feature releases and bug fixes.
  • Learning Curve
    New users or those accustomed to other design tools might face a learning curve in adapting to OpenDesign.dev.
  • Feature Set
    Compared to established proprietary design software, OpenDesign.dev may have a limited feature set or miss advanced tools.

Material Design for Angular features and specs

  • Consistent Design Language
    Material Design for Angular provides a comprehensive set of design guidelines and components that ensure a consistent look and feel across applications. This can enhance user experience by providing familiar UI components.
  • Comprehensive Component Library
    It offers a wide range of pre-built UI components which are easily customizable and help in speeding up the development process by allowing developers to use ready-made solutions instead of building components from scratch.
  • Responsive Design
    Material Design ensures that applications are responsive, which is crucial for providing a seamless user experience across different devices and screen sizes.
  • Integration with Angular
    Being developed specifically for Angular, it integrates smoothly with Angular applications, leveraging features like Angular's dependency injection and change detection for efficient performance.
  • Active Community and Support
    The project has an active community backed by Google, which means consistent updates, bug fixes, and a wealth of resources available for learning and troubleshooting.

Possible disadvantages of Material Design for Angular

  • Learning Curve
    Developers may face a learning curve if they are not familiar with Angular or the Material Design guidelines, which can slow down the initial development process.
  • Bundle Size
    Including all Material Design components can lead to a larger bundle size, which might affect the performance of the application, especially on mobile devices.
  • Opinionated Design Decisions
    Material Design imposes specific design principles which might not be suitable for all applications. Developers seeking highly customized UI components might find it restrictive.
  • Dependency on Angular
    This library is specifically for Angular, so it limits reusability across projects not using Angular. This creates a dependency that can be a disadvantage if you plan to switch frameworks.
  • Complexity in Customization
    While Material Design components are feature-rich, customizing them for unique application needs can sometimes be complex and require deep knowledge of both Angular and the Material Design framework.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to OpenDesign.dev and Material Design for Angular)
Design Tools
44 44%
56% 56
Productivity
100 100%
0% 0
Developer Tools
39 39%
61% 61
CSS Framework
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using OpenDesign.dev and Material Design for Angular. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Material Design for Angular seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 1 time since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

OpenDesign.dev mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of OpenDesign.dev yet. Tracking of OpenDesign.dev recommendations started around Jun 2021.

Material Design for Angular mentions (1)

  • AngularJS is dead.
    We’ll provide read-only access to the code, issue, and pull request history on GitHub by archiving the angular.js repo and related repositories (that is, AngularJS Material, bower-material, etc.). - Source: dev.to / over 3 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing OpenDesign.dev and Material Design for Angular, you can also consider the following products

Atomize React - An open source design system for ReactJS

Bootstrap - Simple and flexible HTML, CSS, and JS for popular UI components and interactions

Khagwal 3D Illustration Library - Free 3D illustration library for web & mobile app designers

Phoenixcoded Able Pro - Top Rated admin template of Able pro bootstrap 4, Angular 10, React-Redux, & Figma version of the admin template by phoenixcoded.

Illustration Plugin for Figma - Free illustrations library for everyone

Animate.css - Animate.css is a cross-browser library of CSS animations.