Software Alternatives & Reviews
Register | Login

Open Visual Traceroute VS iperf

Compare Open Visual Traceroute VS iperf and see what are their differences

NinjaOne
NinjaOne (Formerly NinjaRMM) provides remote monitoring and management software that combines powerful functionality with a fast, modern UI. Easily remediate IT issues, automate common tasks, and support end-users with powerful IT management tools. featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

Open Visual Traceroute logo Open Visual Traceroute

Open source cross-platform (Windows/Linux/Mac) Java Visual Traceroute, packet sniffer and Whois.

iperf logo iperf

A TCP, UDP, and SCTP network bandwidth measurement tool
  • Open Visual Traceroute Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-22
  • iperf Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-17

Open Visual Traceroute videos

+ Add

Open visual traceroute

iperf videos

+ Add

Using Iperf to measure network speed / bandwidth

More videos:

  • Tutorial - How to use iperf to test local network LAN speed in Windows 10
  • Review - [HOWTO] Test My Network Speed?! [iPerf & JPerf]

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Open Visual Traceroute and iperf)

Open Visual Traceroute

iperf

Monitoring Tools
13 13%
Monitoring Tools
87% 87
OS & Utilities
100 100%
OS & Utilities
0% 0
Log Management
9 9%
Log Management
91% 91
Network & Admin
0 0%
Network & Admin
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Open Visual Traceroute and iperf. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, iperf seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 4 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Open Visual Traceroute mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Open Visual Traceroute yet. Tracking of Open Visual Traceroute recommendations started around Mar 2021.

iperf mentions (4)

  • Microsoft: Don't Use Iperf3 on Windows
    Just some clarification: IPerf 2 is different from the iperf3 found at https://github.com/esnet/iperf. - Source: Hacker News / 14 days ago
  • Yet Another Bench Script (YABS): evaluate Linux server performance with this simple Bash script and utility
    Network - network throughput (both incoming and outgoing) is tested using iperf3 on several geographically diverse public iperf servers. Source: over 1 year ago
  • Speed testing Visible with a modem
    File transfer using iperf3 over Tailscale. I noticed that the bandwidth to my home computer (on a 500/500 fiber connection) was higher than with speedtest.net. For the first few days I was getting downloads and uploads of 28Mbps (+/- std dev of 6Mbps) and 150ms latency (+/- 35ms). After somewhere around 100GB total transfer (maybe half of that over Tailscale), it is now downloading and uploading at 10Mbps (+/-... Source: about 2 years ago
  • FTP upload speed isn't great
    I can add to this. I have two mini self contained projects to create multiarch static bins of mtr and iperf3 for general usage. Source: almost 3 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Open Visual Traceroute and iperf, you can also consider the following products

PingPlotter - PingPlotter is a troubleshooting tool that helps IT professionals and neophytes identify, diagnose, and resolve network issues.

JPerf - This project gives a better UI and new functionalities to the initial JPerf 1.

SmokePing - Smokeping is a tool for measuring latency.

mtr - mtr combines the functionality of the 'traceroute' and 'ping' programs in a single...

WinMTR - Free Network Diagnostic Tool. WinMTR is an equivalent of mtr for Windows.

Wireshark - Wireshark is a network protocol analyzer for Unix and Windows. It lets you capture and interactively browse the traffic running on a computer network.

Loading...