Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Open Science Framework VS TidyCal

Compare Open Science Framework VS TidyCal and see what are their differences

Open Science Framework logo Open Science Framework

Open Science Framework provides project management with collaborators, and project sharing with the public.

TidyCal logo TidyCal

Optimize your schedule with custom booking pages and calendar integrations
  • Open Science Framework Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-12-18
  • TidyCal Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-05-15

Scheduling a meeting shouldn’t require endless rounds of email tag just to find a time that works for all your stakeholders. (“Next month is a no-go, too. Should we try for 3 p.m. CT next year?”)

It’s hard enough to find work-life balance when you’re manually coordinating across time zones and merging details from your work and personal calendars.

You need a stress-free way to manage meetings across all your calendars.

Open Science Framework features and specs

  • Accessibility
    The Open Science Framework (OSF) is designed to be a free and open platform making it accessible to a wide range of researchers who can share and access data without any cost barriers.
  • Collaboration
    OSF facilitates collaboration among researchers by enabling easy sharing of resources, data, and ideas across different institutions and geographical locations.
  • Version Control
    OSF offers version control features that allow researchers to track changes over time, making it easier to manage updates and revisions to datasets and project documentation.
  • Integration
    OSF integrates with various other tools and services like GitHub, Dropbox, and Zotero, enhancing its functionality and allowing for flexible data management and sharing.
  • Transparency
    By providing tools for project management and research dissemination, OSF promotes transparency in research processes and outcomes, enhancing reproducibility.

Possible disadvantages of Open Science Framework

  • Learning Curve
    For users who are not familiar with online collaborative tools, OSF might have a steep learning curve which can be a barrier to full utilization of its features.
  • Limited Features
    While OSF integrates with various services, some researchers may find that it lacks specific advanced functionalities needed for niche or highly specialized tasks.
  • Reliability Concerns
    As with any online platform, there can be concerns about the reliability and stability of the service, especially during periods of high traffic or maintenance.
  • Privacy Issues
    Although OSF offers private project options, there may still be concerns about data privacy and security, especially for sensitive or proprietary data.
  • Dependency on Internet Access
    OSF requires a stable internet connection for access, which can be a limitation in areas with poor connectivity or in cases of internet outages.

TidyCal features and specs

  • Affordability
    TidyCal is known for its budget-friendly pricing compared to other scheduling tools, making it accessible for small businesses and individual professionals.
  • User-Friendly Interface
    The platform is designed with simplicity in mind, making it easy for users to set up and manage their schedules without a steep learning curve.
  • Integration Capabilities
    TidyCal integrates with popular calendar services like Google Calendar, ensuring seamless synchronization and reducing the chances of double bookings.
  • Customizable Booking Pages
    Users can create personalized booking pages with customizable branding options, enhancing the professional appearance for clients.
  • Automated Reminders
    The tool includes features that automatically send reminders to both hosts and participants, reducing the likelihood of missed appointments.

Possible disadvantages of TidyCal

  • Limited Advanced Features
    Compared to more established competitors, TidyCal lacks some advanced scheduling features, such as detailed reporting and analytics.
  • Scalability Issues
    While suitable for small businesses and individuals, TidyCal may not scale effectively for larger organizations with more complex scheduling needs.
  • Fewer Integrations
    The range of third-party integrations is more limited compared to other scheduling tools, which could be a drawback for users reliant on a wide array of software solutions.
  • Basic Customization
    Though it offers some customization options, they are relatively basic, which may not meet the needs of users looking for more extensive personalization.
  • Customer Support
    Some users have reported that customer support response times and solutions are not as robust as those offered by leading competitors in the scheduling software market.

Open Science Framework videos

What is the Open Science Framework all about?

More videos:

  • Review - Pre-Registering your Research with Open Science Framework

TidyCal videos

Your calendar app for scheduling and booking meetings TidyCal

More videos:

  • Tutorial - TidyCal Review & Tutorial | How to Schedule A Meetings Like a PRO
  • Review - TidyCal Review By Appsumo Originals 🌟 (Timecodes Included) | Shehraj Singh

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Open Science Framework and TidyCal)
Productivity
3 3%
97% 97
Text Editors
100 100%
0% 0
Appointments and Scheduling
IDE
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using Open Science Framework and TidyCal. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Open Science Framework seems to be a lot more popular than TidyCal. While we know about 38 links to Open Science Framework, we've tracked only 1 mention of TidyCal. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Open Science Framework mentions (38)

  • So you wanna de-bog yourself
    Last night I happened to listen to an episode[1] on EconTalk where the author of the post (Adam Mastroianni, a psychologist) was a guest. Definitely worth a listen. Adam also supports "open science framework" (https://osf.io/) and publishes his research and related artifacts there, which I really appreciate! [1] https://www.econtalk.org/a-users-guide-to-our-emotional-thermostat-with-adam-mastroianni/. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
  • Ask HN: How to discover new and interesting papers?
    Here are a few options to consider. First, Google Scholar. If you're logged into Google it will make a handful of recommendations on its front page. I've not really paid attention to how good the recommendations are. It says they're based on your Google Scholar record and alerts, so I guess you'll need both/one of those for it to work. https://scholar.google.com Second, Scopus from Elsevier (a company that plenty... - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
  • Bad numbers in the “gzip beats BERT” paper?
    It's customary to use OSF (https://osf.io/) on papers this "groundbreaking," as it encourages scientists to validate and replicate the work. It's also weird that at this stage there are not validation checks in place, exactly like those the author performed. There was so much talk of needing this post-"replication crisis.". - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago
  • For members of "science twitter" who are opposed to Twitter's recently deployed content-wall - what are some alternative platforms that help academics openly share and discuss scientific research?
    2.Open Science Framework - A non-profit (but not open source) "GitHub for scientific research" [4]. OSF is an incredible team and and product, that helps scientists openly publish their papers, datasets, code, and other research outputs. Their website is also geared towards a technical audience too - they help scientists store information, but they don't have a feature that helps users discover discuss new... Source: almost 2 years ago
  • Análisis sobre el impacto de bajar los impuestos marginales - USS
    Our headline result is that a 10 percent increase in taxes is associated with a decrease in annual gross domestic product (GDP) growth of approximately −0.2 percent when bundled as part of a TaxNegative tax-spending-deficit combination. The same tax increase is associated with an increase in annual GDP growth of approximately 0.2 percent when part of a TaxPositive fiscal policy package. All of our data, output,... Source: almost 2 years ago
View more

TidyCal mentions (1)

  • Appointment Booking Issues - what tool would be best?
    We use https://tidycal.com/ because you get a lifetime deal when you buy it and you can sync your calendar with it, so if you or your partners are already booked, it will not allow someone to book during that timeslot. Source: over 2 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Open Science Framework and TidyCal, you can also consider the following products

figshare - Securely store and manage your research outputs in the cloud, or make them openly available and citable.

Cal.com - Cal.com (formerly Calendso) is the open source Calendly alternative.

CodeOcean - Code Ocean is a research collaboration platform. Create, collaborate on, share, execute, and publish computational code and data from anywhere, with anyone.

Calendly - Say goodbye to phone and email tag for finding the perfect meeting time with Calendly. It's 100% free, super easy to use and you'll love our customer service.

MIT License - A license from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

SavvyCal - A scheduling tool both the sender and the recipient will love.