Software Alternatives & Reviews
Register | Login

Open Nettest VS iperf

Compare Open Nettest VS iperf and see what are their differences

ComplyCube
Verify your customers in under 15 seconds anywhere in the world with a cutting-edge SaaS & API platform for Identity Verification and AML/KYC compliance. featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

Open Nettest logo Open Nettest

Open Nettest is a platform for collecting, processing and visualizing data related QoS and QoE.

iperf logo iperf

A TCP, UDP, and SCTP network bandwidth measurement tool
  • Open Nettest Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-06-16
  • iperf Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-17

Open Nettest videos

No Open Nettest videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

+ Add video

iperf videos

+ Add

Using Iperf to measure network speed / bandwidth

More videos:

  • Tutorial - How to use iperf to test local network LAN speed in Windows 10
  • Review - [HOWTO] Test My Network Speed?! [iPerf & JPerf]

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Open Nettest and iperf)

Open Nettest

iperf

Monitoring Tools
30 30%
Monitoring Tools
70% 70
OS & Utilities
100 100%
OS & Utilities
0% 0
Log Management
14 14%
Log Management
86% 86
Security
52 52%
Security
48% 48

User comments

Share your experience with using Open Nettest and iperf. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, iperf seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 4 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Open Nettest mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Open Nettest yet. Tracking of Open Nettest recommendations started around Mar 2021.

iperf mentions (4)

  • Microsoft: Don't Use Iperf3 on Windows
    Just some clarification: IPerf 2 is different from the iperf3 found at https://github.com/esnet/iperf. - Source: Hacker News / 14 days ago
  • Yet Another Bench Script (YABS): evaluate Linux server performance with this simple Bash script and utility
    Network - network throughput (both incoming and outgoing) is tested using iperf3 on several geographically diverse public iperf servers. Source: over 1 year ago
  • Speed testing Visible with a modem
    File transfer using iperf3 over Tailscale. I noticed that the bandwidth to my home computer (on a 500/500 fiber connection) was higher than with speedtest.net. For the first few days I was getting downloads and uploads of 28Mbps (+/- std dev of 6Mbps) and 150ms latency (+/- 35ms). After somewhere around 100GB total transfer (maybe half of that over Tailscale), it is now downloading and uploading at 10Mbps (+/-... Source: about 2 years ago
  • FTP upload speed isn't great
    I can add to this. I have two mini self contained projects to create multiarch static bins of mtr and iperf3 for general usage. Source: almost 3 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Open Nettest and iperf, you can also consider the following products

Fping (open source) - fping is a program to send ICMP echo probes to network hosts, similar to ping, but much better performing when pinging multiple hosts.

JPerf - This project gives a better UI and new functionalities to the initial JPerf 1.

Ping Meter Gadget - Customizable, graphical, semi-transparent ping (latency) meter.

mtr - mtr combines the functionality of the 'traceroute' and 'ping' programs in a single...

NetCrunch Tools - Our free network tools offer ping scanning, SNMP scanning, port and network service scanning, and more.

Wireshark - Wireshark is a network protocol analyzer for Unix and Windows. It lets you capture and interactively browse the traffic running on a computer network.

Loading...