Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Fping (open source) VS Open Nettest

Compare Fping (open source) VS Open Nettest and see what are their differences

Fping (open source) logo Fping (open source)

fping is a program to send ICMP echo probes to network hosts, similar to ping, but much better performing when pinging multiple hosts.

Open Nettest logo Open Nettest

Open Nettest is a platform for collecting, processing and visualizing data related QoS and QoE.
  • Fping (open source) Landing page
    Landing page //
    2020-02-14
  • Open Nettest Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-06-16

Fping (open source) features and specs

  • Speed
    Fping is designed to send out multiple ICMP Echo Requests in parallel, allowing it to quickly scan large numbers of hosts compared to traditional ping commands.
  • Scripting Friendly
    Fping is suitable for use in shell scripts due to its output format, making it useful for automated network monitoring and management tasks.
  • IPv4 and IPv6 Support
    Fping supports both IPv4 and IPv6, providing flexibility for various network environments.
  • Customizable Options
    It offers a wide range of options for setting the number of pings, intervals, and timing, allowing users to tailor the tool to suit specific needs.
  • Resource Efficiency
    Fping consumes fewer system resources compared to some GUI-based network tools, making it ideal for running on servers and low-power devices.

Possible disadvantages of Fping (open source)

  • Command-Line Interface Only
    Fping does not have a graphical user interface, which may make it less accessible to users who are not familiar with command-line operations.
  • Advanced Configuration Complexity
    While it is highly configurable, the range of options and parameters can be overwhelming for new users who may not have a deep understanding of networking.
  • Limited To Echo Requests
    Fping is designed specifically for ICMP Echo Requests, limiting its usefulness for scenarios that require more in-depth network diagnostics.
  • Lack of Built-In Analysis
    Unlike some more comprehensive network monitoring tools, Fping does not include features for detailed analysis and visualization of network data.
  • Potential Security Restrictions
    Some networks may have security policies that restrict the use of ICMP packets, which could limit Fping's effectiveness or even prevent it from functioning.

Open Nettest features and specs

  • User-Friendly Interface
    Open Nettest provides a straightforward and easy-to-navigate interface, making it accessible for users with varying levels of technical expertise to test their internet connectivity.
  • Comprehensive Metrics
    The tool offers detailed insights into various connectivity metrics, such as download and upload speeds, latency, and packet loss, providing a comprehensive view of network performance.
  • Cross-Platform Availability
    Open Nettest is available across multiple platforms, including web browsers and mobile devices, ensuring users can test connectivity across different devices seamlessly.
  • Open Source
    Being open-source, Open Nettest allows users and developers to access and modify the source code, fostering transparency and community-driven improvements.
  • No Cost
    Open Nettest is free to use, making it an economical choice for individuals and organizations looking to monitor their internet performance without incurring additional costs.

Possible disadvantages of Open Nettest

  • Limited Advanced Features
    While offering essential metrics, Open Nettest might lack some of the advanced features and analytics tools available in specialized network testing solutions.
  • Dependence on Internet Connection
    As an online tool, the accuracy and reliability of tests can be affected by transient network issues or heavy load on the test server.
  • Potential Privacy Concerns
    Users may have concerns regarding data privacy and how the information collected during tests is stored and used, despite it being an open-source tool.
  • Community Support
    Being open-source, support may primarily come from the community, which might not be as prompt or structured as professional support services.
  • Variable Server Locations
    The results can vary widely depending on the test server's location, which might not always reflect the most accurate representation of a user's actual everyday internet performance.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Fping (open source) and Open Nettest)
Monitoring Tools
58 58%
42% 42
Security
57 57%
43% 43
OS & Utilities
59 59%
41% 41
Log Management
72 72%
28% 28

User comments

Share your experience with using Fping (open source) and Open Nettest. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Fping (open source) and Open Nettest, you can also consider the following products

Ping Meter Gadget - Customizable, graphical, semi-transparent ping (latency) meter.

PingInfoView - PingInfoView is a small utility that allows you to easily ping multiple host names and IP addresses, and watch the result in one table.

PingDoctor - PingDoctor is software that is considered to be the most powerful and easiest to use network route analyzer.

NetCrunch Tools - Our free network tools offer ping scanning, SNMP scanning, port and network service scanning, and more.

OpenSpeedTest - Broadband Internet Speed Test Unlocked!

NetTK - NetTK, Network Tool Kit, is an Open Source alternative for monitoring and troubleshooting your...