Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Open NASA VS runc

Compare Open NASA VS runc and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Open NASA logo Open NASA

NASA data, tools, and resources

runc logo runc

CLI tool for spawning and running containers according to the OCI specification - opencontainers/runc
  • Open NASA Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-15
  • runc Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-08-21

Open NASA features and specs

  • Empowerment
    Open NASA encourages and empowers women to pursue careers in STEM fields by providing role models and success stories.
  • Visibility
    The platform increases visibility of women in NASA, showcasing their contributions and achievements in space exploration.
  • Inspiration
    By highlighting the journeys of women at NASA, the site serves as a source of inspiration for young girls and women considering STEM careers.
  • Educational Resource
    Offers educational content that can be used by teachers and students to learn more about the role of women in science and technology.

Possible disadvantages of Open NASA

  • Limited Audience
    The content might not reach a wide audience beyond those already interested in NASA or gender diversity in STEM.
  • Impact Measurement
    The direct impact of the site on increasing women participation in STEM fields can be difficult to measure objectively.
  • Content Depth
    Depending on user expectations, some may find the content not deep enough in terms of technical detail or personal stories.
  • Resource Intensive
    Maintenance and updating of the platform require continuous resources, which might be challenging for ensuring updated information.

runc features and specs

  • Standardization
    runc is part of the Open Containers Initiative (OCI), promoting standardization across container runtimes. This ensures interoperability and broad community support.
  • Lightweight
    As a lightweight and fast CLI tool, runc provides a minimal runtime for environments where resource efficiency is critical.
  • Security
    runc adheres to principles of secure software development and incorporates Linux kernel features like namespaces and cgroups to enhance security.
  • Broad Adoption
    As the reference implementation for OCI, runc is widely adopted and tested in production environments, ensuring reliability.
  • Flexibility
    runc offers the flexibility to handle low-level container configurations, making it suitable for advanced users needing granular control.

Possible disadvantages of runc

  • Complexity for Beginners
    The low-level nature of runc can be daunting for beginners who might prefer higher-level tools like Docker that abstract away complexities.
  • Minimalist Design
    While its simplicity is an advantage, runc lacks some of the advanced features and orchestration capabilities found in other container platforms.
  • Manual Configurations
    Users need to manually handle configurations, which can be error-prone and time-consuming compared to automated solutions.
  • Ecosystem Integration
    runc does not provide direct integration with tools and platforms by default, requiring additional setup for comprehensive ecosystem support.
  • Limited Features
    Compared to complete container platforms, runc offers fewer built-in features, requiring supplementary tools to achieve similar functionalities.

Open NASA videos

No Open NASA videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

runc videos

2/21/19 RunC Vulnerability Gives Root Access on Container Systems| AT&T ThreatTraq

More videos:

  • Review - Demo MONEY,TIME - RunC

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Open NASA and runc)
Web App
100 100%
0% 0
Web Servers
0 0%
100% 100
Productivity
100 100%
0% 0
Web And Application Servers

User comments

Share your experience with using Open NASA and runc. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, runc seems to be a lot more popular than Open NASA. While we know about 11 links to runc, we've tracked only 1 mention of Open NASA. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Open NASA mentions (1)

  • How can I stay motivated in school if I'm not 100% sure what path I want to take?
    I do think women have a harder row to hoe at NASA. But more women are working there than ever before and some in high-level positions. Here are a few women at NASA: https://women.nasa.gov/. Source: about 3 years ago

runc mentions (11)

  • Setup multi node kubernetes cluster using kubeadm
    For kubeadm , kubetlet , kubectl should same version package in this lab I used v1.31 to have 1.31.7 References: Https://kubernetes.io/docs/reference/networking/ports-and-protocols/ Https://kubernetes.io/docs/setup/production-environment/tools/kubeadm/install-kubeadm/ Https://github.com/opencontainers/runc/releases/... - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago
  • Comparing 3 Docker container runtimes - Runc, gVisor and Kata Containers
    Previously I wrote about the multiple variants of Docker and also the dependencies behind the Docker daemon. One of the dependencies was the container runtime called runc. That is what creates the usual containers we are all familiar with. When you use Docker, this is the default runtime, which is understandable since it was started by Docker, Inc. - Source: dev.to / 7 months ago
  • You run containers, not dockers - Discussing Docker variants, components and versioning
    Now we have dockerd which uses containerd, but containerd will not create containers directly. It needs a runtime and the default runtime is runc, but that can be changed. Containerd actually doesn't have to know the parameters of the runtime. There is a shim process between containerd and runc, so containerd knows the parameters of the shim, and the shim knows the parameters of runc or other runtimes. - Source: dev.to / 7 months ago
  • US Cybersecurity: The Urgent Need for Memory Safety in Software Products
    It's interesting that, in light of things like this, you still see large software companies adding support for new components written in non-memory safe languages (e.g. C) As an example Red Hat OpenShift added support for crun(https://github.com/containers/crun), which is written in C as an alternative to runc, which is written in Go( - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
  • Why did the Krustlet project die?
    Yeah, runtimeClass lets you specify which CRI plugin you want based on what you have available. Here's an example from the containerd documentation - you could have one node that can run containers under standard runc, gvisor, kata containers, or WASM. Without runtimeClass, you'd need either some form of custom solution or four differently configured nodes to run those different runtimes. That's how krustlet did... Source: over 2 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Open NASA and runc, you can also consider the following products

Code NASA - 253 NASA open source software projects

Docker Hub - Docker Hub is a cloud-based registry service

NASA Exoplanet Posters - Imagine visiting worlds outside our solar system

Apache Thrift - An interface definition language and communication protocol for creating cross-language services.

NASA Image and Video Library - Official NASA library, searchable by keywords and metadata

Eureka - Eureka is a contact center and enterprise performance through speech analytics that immediately reveals insights from automated analysis of communications including calls, chat, email, texts, social media, surveys and more.