Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Open Collective VS GitLive

Compare Open Collective VS GitLive and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Open Collective logo Open Collective

Recurring funding for groups.

GitLive logo GitLive

Extend Git with real-time collaborative superpowers
  • Open Collective Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-04-25
  • GitLive Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-12-08

📣 The future of social coding

Connect. ◾️See when your fellow contributors are online and which repos, branches and files they are working on. Automated. ◾️Connect your issue tracker to share what issue you are working on based on your current branch.

📣 Resolve conflicts before they happen

Live. ◾️ See others' local changes in the gutter of your editor and get notified the moment you make a conflicting change. Patch. ◾️View diffs of other contributors' local files and cherry‑pick individual lines, files or complete working copies.

📣 Code together in real‑time

Codeshare. ◾️Make voice and video calls directly from your editor and codeshare to see each others cursors.
Agnostic. ◾️Edit together simultaneously, interoperable between VS Code and all JetBrains IDEs.

Open Collective features and specs

  • Transparency
    Open Collective offers transparent accounting and financial reporting, allowing everyone to see how funds are being used.
  • Community Engagement
    It allows communities to come together and support projects they care about with funding, facilitating strong community involvement.
  • Easy Fundraising
    The platform simplifies the process of raising funds for open source projects, non-profits, and other community-driven initiatives.
  • Global Reach
    Open Collective supports contributions from around the world, which can significantly expand the pool of potential donors and supporters.
  • Managed Fiscal Hosting
    It provides fiscal hosting services that handle various financial and administrative tasks, reducing the workload for project maintainers.

Possible disadvantages of Open Collective

  • Fees
    Open Collective charges fees for its services, which can be a downside for projects with limited budgets.
  • Complexity for Small Projects
    For very small projects or initiatives, the platform might be overly complex and offer more features than needed.
  • Dependence on Platform
    Relying solely on Open Collective for funding and financial management might create dependency, limiting flexibility to switch strategies.
  • Geographical Limitations
    While it has global reach, there may be certain countries where donors or users face restrictions or limitations in using the platform.
  • Learning Curve
    New users might find the platform's features and options overwhelming at the start, requiring time to learn and navigate effectively.

GitLive features and specs

  • Real time collaboration
  • Communication & Notifications
  • Code Editor

Open Collective videos

What is Open Collective?

GitLive videos

Extend Git with real-time collaborative superpowers

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Open Collective and GitLive)
Crowdfunding
100 100%
0% 0
Code Collaboration
0 0%
100% 100
Fundraising And Donation Management
Developer Tools
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Open Collective and GitLive. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Open Collective seems to be a lot more popular than GitLive. While we know about 159 links to Open Collective, we've tracked only 3 mentions of GitLive. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Open Collective mentions (159)

  • Funding in Open Source: A Conversation with Chad Whitacre
    Chad has been leading the Open Source Pledge, a simple framework to get companies to fund the projects they rely on. The idea is straightforward: for every developer your company employs, allocate $2,000 per year to open source. Distribute those funds however you want—GitHub Sponsors, Open Collective, Thanks.dev, direct payments, etc. The only other ask is to publish a blog post showing what you did. - Source: dev.to / 10 days ago
  • None of the top 10 projects in GitHub is actually a software project 🤯
    We see some projects that can financially survive (via sponsor or external infrastructure such as open collective or patreon), favoring the long-term sustainability. Thus, we keep our stand on promoting a transparent governance model to state where the investment will be managed and who can benefit from it, especially when knowing that non-technical users have an increasing key role in these communities. - Source: dev.to / 9 days ago
  • Sustainable Funding for Open Source: Navigating Challenges and Emerging Innovations
    Leverage multiple platforms: Utilize GitHub Sponsors along with OpenCollective to broaden funding sources. - Source: dev.to / 10 days ago
  • Exploring Open Source Project Sponsorship Opportunities: Enhancing Innovation with Blockchain and NFTs
    Traditionally, open source projects were sustained by volunteer contributions and modest donations. However, as digital infrastructure came to rely on open source software, the need for reliable, scalable funding became evident. Enter corporate sponsorship—a model where companies invest in open source initiatives to secure their technology stacks, attract top talent, and foster innovation. This has spurred the... - Source: dev.to / 12 days ago
  • Innovative Strategies for Open Source Project Funding: A Comprehensive Guide
    Abstract: This post explores various open source project funding strategies and examines their evolution, core concepts, applications, challenges, and future trends. We discuss methods such as sponsorship and donations, crowdfunding, dual licensing, paid services, foundations and grants, and the freemium model. Through real-world examples and a technical yet accessible approach, this guide offers insight into... - Source: dev.to / 12 days ago
View more

GitLive mentions (3)

  • Building Remote Teams for Startups
    There are plenty of tools that have started popping up to try and improve this situation since last year. CodeTogether, Duckly, Code With Me, and GitLive to name a few. Source: over 3 years ago
  • Dev resources and articles plus news from Huawei's Android alternative HarmonyOS, Mozilla launches MDN Plus, and more.
    GitLive. Extend your IDE with the real-time features remote development teams need to work together effectively. See what your teammates are working on and get notified of merge conflicts before you commit. Make video calls and code together live, VS Code to JetBrains. [GITLIVE]. - Source: dev.to / almost 4 years ago
  • Closest too to intellij conflict resolution?
    This is in no way an answer to your question but perhaps you would find git.live's merge conflict detection feature useful to potentially avoid the conflicts in the first place 😅. Source: about 4 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Open Collective and GitLive, you can also consider the following products

GitHub Sponsors - Get paid to build what you love on GitHub

CodeStream - CodeStream helps development teams resolve issues faster, and improve code quality by streamlining code reviews inside your IDE

Liberapay - Liberapay is a recurrent donations platform.

Refactor.io - Share your code instantly for refactoring and code review

Patreon - Patreon enables fans to give ongoing support to their favorite creators.

Codebeat for iOS - Automated code review for iOS