Software Alternatives & Reviews

Open Build Service VS Launchpad.net

Compare Open Build Service VS Launchpad.net and see what are their differences

Open Build Service logo Open Build Service

Open Build Service

Launchpad.net logo Launchpad.net

Launchpad is a software collaboration platform by Canonical
  • Open Build Service Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-04-17
  • Launchpad.net Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-23

Open Build Service videos

Open Build Service at Datto The Good, The Bad and The Ugly

More videos:

  • Review - Building a Visual Studio Code extension for the Open Build Service
  • Review - TUT89692 DevOps and the Open Build Service

Launchpad.net videos

Review: LaunchPad X vs MINI MK3 // Custom layout tutorial // Novation LaunchPad

More videos:

  • Review - Novation Launchpad MK2 Review
  • Review - LAUNCHPAD X – What is it and what can it do?

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Open Build Service and Launchpad.net)
Code Collaboration
15 15%
85% 85
Git
15 15%
85% 85
Project Management
14 14%
86% 86
Development
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using Open Build Service and Launchpad.net. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Launchpad.net should be more popular than Open Build Service. It has been mentiond 64 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Open Build Service mentions (21)

  • Rust Without Crates.io
    In Fedora, mock[0] is used to build packages in clean chroot for multiple of distros. In SuSE, Open Build Service[1] I used. [0]: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Using_Mock_to_test_package_builds [1]: https://openbuildservice.org. - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago
  • Mozilla's Firefox Nightly .deb Package for Debian-Based Linux Distributions
    I wish more software developers would use Open Build Service and create many packages for many distros: https://openbuildservice.org/. - Source: Hacker News / 6 months ago
  • Are you considering the switch to Linux? Exploring the Linux universe made easy! Introducing our new website page, showcasing 10 Linux variants. Compare the pros and cons of each variant effortlessly. 🐧💻 #LinuxVariants #opensource #linux #NovaCustom
    OpenSUSE also provides it's own instance of openbuildservice. Source: 11 months ago
  • LURE Version 0.0.7 released. First beta version!
    I see! So it is like a local https://openbuildservice.org/. Source: about 1 year ago
  • Is it possible to make a CI/CD pipeline to build my own packages and create a repo?
    You can look at Open Build Service (OBS) and you can try it for free in OpenSuse OBS. Source: over 1 year ago
View more

Launchpad.net mentions (64)

  • Quickemu: Quickly run optimised Windows, macOS and Linux virtual machines
    I agree, but I think that model of GPG is not how it's used any more. I think nowadays people upload a one-shot CI key, which is used to sign builds. So you're basically saying "The usual machine built this". Which is good information, don't get me wrong, but it's much less secure than "John was logged into his laptop and entered the password for the key that signed this" So, you're right, that GPG verifies... - Source: Hacker News / 3 months ago
  • Mozilla's new Firefox Linux package for Ubuntu and Debian derivatives
    You can use https://launchpad.net/~mozillateam/+archive/ubuntu/ppa/, but that's no official Mozilla repository. - Source: Hacker News / 3 months ago
  • Mozilla's new Firefox Linux package for Ubuntu and Debian derivatives
    As a user of the PPA packages (https://launchpad.net/~mozillateam/+archive/ubuntu/ppa), now I'm confused. Are these the same packages? Should I switch? I'd have appreciated at least a mention in the article. - Source: Hacker News / 3 months ago
  • Firefox Developer Edition and Beta: Try Out Mozilla's .deb Package
    There's also a PPA: https://launchpad.net/~mozillateam/+archive/ubuntu/ppa Though you'll have to convince Ubuntu to prefer that instead of the snap. It's not hard, certainly easier than installing Debian which is probably still what I should have done. I think I used this guide: https://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2022/04/how-to-install-firefox-deb-apt-ubuntu-22-04 Though what that doesn't tell you is that the snap... - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago
  • Fedora Workstation 39
    Https://launchpad.net/~mozillateam/+archive/ubuntu/ppa A quick google will find plenty of sites telling you how to adjust the package versioning priorities to keep the MozillaTeam version of FF preferred over the crappy snap one. I still use Ubuntu desktop as my daily driver and server OS, and we have zero snaps installed on any of our systems. - Source: Hacker News / 6 months ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Open Build Service and Launchpad.net, you can also consider the following products

Crowdin - Localize your product in a seamless way

GitHub - Originally founded as a project to simplify sharing code, GitHub has grown into an application used by over a million people to store over two million code repositories, making GitHub the largest code host in the world.

TuxFamily - TuxFamily is a non-profit organization.

GitLab - Create, review and deploy code together with GitLab open source git repo management software | GitLab

BitBucket - Bitbucket is a free code hosting site for Mercurial and Git. Manage your development with a hosted wiki, issue tracker and source code.

gitstorage - An on-premise device that combines the best of hosted options and on-premise solutions for source...