Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

OnCore VS Structure

Compare OnCore VS Structure and see what are their differences

3D Cityplanner
Transforming urban planning with smarter designs, data-driven decisions, and sustainable solutions for the cities of tomorrow. featured
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

OnCore logo OnCore

OnCore Enterprise Research system supports efficient processes at academic medical centers, cancer centers, and health care systems.

Structure logo Structure

3D Sensor for iOS
  • OnCore Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-03-26
  • Structure Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-20

OnCore features and specs

  • Comprehensive Functionality
    OnCore offers a wide range of features, including protocol management, subject tracking, financial management, and reporting, designed to streamline the clinical trial process.
  • Integration Capability
    The system can integrate with other platforms and electronic health records (EHRs), facilitating seamless data flow across different systems involved in clinical trials.
  • Regulatory Compliance
    OnCore ensures compliance with regulatory requirements, helping institutions maintain adherence to industry standards and avoid potential legal and financial penalties.
  • Customizable Workflows
    Users can customize the workflows to better match their specific clinical trial processes, making the system flexible to different institutional needs.
  • Enhanced Collaboration
    OnCore promotes better collaboration among different stakeholders, including researchers, administrators, and finance departments, by providing a centralized platform for data and communication.

Possible disadvantages of OnCore

  • High Implementation Costs
    The initial setup and ongoing maintenance costs can be high, potentially making it less accessible for smaller research sites or institutions with limited budgets.
  • Complexity
    Due to its comprehensive nature, the system can be complex and may require extensive training for users to become proficient, which can be time-consuming.
  • Customization Challenges
    While customization is a feature, it can be challenging and may require additional time and technical expertise to tailor the system to specific institutional needs.
  • Dependency on Technical Support
    Users may frequently need to rely on technical support for troubleshooting and system management, which could add to the operational costs and time delays.
  • Data Migration Issues
    Migrating legacy data into OnCore can be difficult, involving complex procedures to ensure data accuracy and completeness during the transition.

Structure features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

OnCore videos

+ Add

OnCore ELIXR - Guerrilla Golf Ball Testing vs Pro-V1

More videos:

  • Review - Best Golf Ball - OnCore Review - Wendell CC - Golf Test Dummy
  • Review - ONCORE ELIXR: Golf Ball Review

Structure videos

+ Add

Outline Your Literature Review's Structure | Scribbr 🎓

More videos:

  • Review - The Structure of a Literature Review | Thesis Writing Guide
  • Review - THESE ARE A MUST! NIKE AIR STRUCTURE OG NEO TEAL AKA INFRARED Review + On Feet

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to OnCore and Structure)

OnCore

Structure

Clinical Trial Management System
100 100%
Clinical Trial Management System
0% 0
3D
0 0%
3D
100% 100
Text Messaging
100 100%
Text Messaging
0% 0
Construction
0 0%
Construction
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using OnCore and Structure. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Structure seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 2 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

OnCore mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of OnCore yet. Tracking of OnCore recommendations started around Mar 2021.

Structure mentions (2)

  • Tangram Vision's AI-powered 3D sensor could transform robotic computer vision
    Hey all, senior engineer on the Tangram team here — we're really excited to be launching HiFi today! Through past work with similar sensors [0][1], we've heard a lot of feedback about what people want from a depth camera! With our expertise in calibration & shipping sensor SDKs in the past, we saw this as an amazing opportunity to ship what we think is a big leap forward in sensing: 1.6MP cameras, AI capability... - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
  • Would 50k-100k be enough to get an 3D scanning app for body parts to be developed from scratch, or adapted from existing work?
    Also check out Occipital. They have a little device (Structure sensor pro) that is clipped on to an iPad and also uses structured light. The resolution is really good and they also have the software to scan for protheses. They claim to be able to 'achieve fast, accurate and reliable medical-grade human body measurements.' Https://structure.io. Source: over 3 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing OnCore and Structure, you can also consider the following products

OpenClinica - OpenClinica is an open source clinical trials software.

Qlone - 3D scan any object with your iPhone or iPad

Castor EDC - Castor offers you a user-friendly and fully featured application for electronic data collection.

Capture - A great free screen capture utility that allows you to capture either a window or the desktop and save it to either a file or the clipboard.

Medidata CTMS - Medidata CTMS seamlessly integrates with Medidata Rave to provide real-time views into study progress without manual tracking.

Bellus3D - Lifelike 3D face scanning from a mobile device

Loading...