Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

OnCore VS GNU Health

Compare OnCore VS GNU Health and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

OnCore logo OnCore

OnCore Enterprise Research system supports efficient processes at academic medical centers, cancer centers, and health care systems.

GNU Health logo GNU Health

GNU Health is a Free/Libre project for health practitioners, health institutions and governments.
  • OnCore Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-03-26
  • GNU Health Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-01

OnCore features and specs

  • Comprehensive Functionality
    OnCore offers a wide range of features, including protocol management, subject tracking, financial management, and reporting, designed to streamline the clinical trial process.
  • Integration Capability
    The system can integrate with other platforms and electronic health records (EHRs), facilitating seamless data flow across different systems involved in clinical trials.
  • Regulatory Compliance
    OnCore ensures compliance with regulatory requirements, helping institutions maintain adherence to industry standards and avoid potential legal and financial penalties.
  • Customizable Workflows
    Users can customize the workflows to better match their specific clinical trial processes, making the system flexible to different institutional needs.
  • Enhanced Collaboration
    OnCore promotes better collaboration among different stakeholders, including researchers, administrators, and finance departments, by providing a centralized platform for data and communication.

Possible disadvantages of OnCore

  • High Implementation Costs
    The initial setup and ongoing maintenance costs can be high, potentially making it less accessible for smaller research sites or institutions with limited budgets.
  • Complexity
    Due to its comprehensive nature, the system can be complex and may require extensive training for users to become proficient, which can be time-consuming.
  • Customization Challenges
    While customization is a feature, it can be challenging and may require additional time and technical expertise to tailor the system to specific institutional needs.
  • Dependency on Technical Support
    Users may frequently need to rely on technical support for troubleshooting and system management, which could add to the operational costs and time delays.
  • Data Migration Issues
    Migrating legacy data into OnCore can be difficult, involving complex procedures to ensure data accuracy and completeness during the transition.

GNU Health features and specs

  • Open Source
    GNU Health is open source, meaning it is freely available to use, modify, and distribute. This allows healthcare organizations to reduce costs associated with licensing fees and offers flexibility in customization.
  • Comprehensive EHR
    GNU Health provides a comprehensive electronic health record (EHR) system that caters to various medical and administrative needs, including patient management, billing, and health reporting.
  • Community Support
    Being part of the GNU project, GNU Health benefits from a global community of developers and users who contribute to its development and provide support, fostering continual improvement and innovation.
  • Interoperability
    GNU Health supports standards such as HL7, facilitating interoperability with other healthcare systems and ensuring information can be shared seamlessly between platforms.
  • Multi-language Support
    It supports multiple languages, making it accessible to a diverse range of users globally and adaptable to various regional requirements.

Possible disadvantages of GNU Health

  • Technical Expertise Required
    Implementing and maintaining GNU Health may require a certain level of technical expertise in open-source software, which can be a barrier for organizations without adequate IT staff.
  • Limited Integration
    While GNU Health aims for interoperability, it may still face challenges integrating seamlessly with certain proprietary healthcare systems, which could limit its adoption in some settings.
  • Custom Development Needed
    Organizations might need custom development to tailor GNU Health to specific needs, which could require time and resources beyond what is available out of the box.
  • Learning Curve
    There can be a steep learning curve for new users, which might necessitate additional training and time for staff to effectively use the system.
  • Resource Intensive
    Although it is cost-effective due to its open-source nature, the deployment and maintenance of the system can be resource-intensive, demanding substantial initial setup efforts.

OnCore videos

OnCore ELIXR - Guerrilla Golf Ball Testing vs Pro-V1

More videos:

  • Review - Best Golf Ball - OnCore Review - Wendell CC - Golf Test Dummy
  • Review - ONCORE ELIXR: Golf Ball Review

GNU Health videos

openSUSE Conference 2018 - The GNU Health : Free Software technology improving Public Healthcare aro

More videos:

  • Review - GUADEC 2019 - Luis Falcón, M.D. - GNU HEALTH: The Fight for our Rights in the Public Health System
  • Review - GNU Health MacOS Client

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to OnCore and GNU Health)
Clinical Trial Management System
Medical Practice Management
Text Messaging
100 100%
0% 0
Practice Management
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using OnCore and GNU Health. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, GNU Health seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 1 time since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

OnCore mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of OnCore yet. Tracking of OnCore recommendations started around Mar 2021.

GNU Health mentions (1)

What are some alternatives?

When comparing OnCore and GNU Health, you can also consider the following products

OpenClinica - OpenClinica is an open source clinical trials software.

OpenMRS - OpenMRS is a community-developed, open source, enterprise electronic medical record system platform.

Castor EDC - Castor offers you a user-friendly and fully featured application for electronic data collection.

OpenEMR - OpenEMR is an open source electronic health records and medical practice management solution.

Medidata CTMS - Medidata CTMS seamlessly integrates with Medidata Rave to provide real-time views into study progress without manual tracking.

drchrono - An EHR built for your specialty: