Okta VS BoxyHQ
Compare Okta VS BoxyHQ and see what are their differences
Verify your customers in under 15 seconds anywhere in the world with a cutting-edge SaaS & API platform for Identity Verification and AML/KYC compliance.
featured
Okta
Auth0
OneLogin
Microsoft Azure Active Directory
Ping Identity
Amazon Cognito
Keycloak
Atlassian Crowd
BoxyHQ
Auth0
Skyflow
Frontegg
Keycloak
WorkOS
CipherStash
Dataset Search
SaaS, Premium Self-Hosted, or FREE OSS Self-Hosted
Enterprise Single Sign On (SSO) SAML SSO enables a secure authentication via an organization’s Identity Provider (IdP), as opposed to users or IT admins managing thousands, of usernames and passwords. With our product SAML Jackson, enterprise users can access your product via one of their secure IdPs (like Okta, Microsoft Azure, AWS, etc), which manages access and security for the entire organization.
Directory Sync Organizations use directories from different providers to manage users and enforce their access to organization resources. By integrating our Directory Sync product into your solution you can activate and deactivate user accounts, create groups, and keep your app in sync with the user directory in real-time. Supports the SCIM 2.0 protocol.
Additionally, we offer Audit Logs to track critical events in your application and a Data Privacy Vault to safeguard sensitive data.
Okta BoxyHQBoxyHQ's answer:
BoxyHQ stands out for its comprehensive suite of security building blocks tailored specifically for developers. With features like SAML/OIDC Single Sign-On (SSO) and Directory Sync with SCIM 2.0, BoxyHQ simplifies identity management and access control for B2B SaaS companies. Its focus on providing a seamless and customizable solution empowers developers to enhance security without compromising user experience. Additionally, BoxyHQ offers Audit Logs to track critical events within the product and a Privacy Vault, an API to protect sensitive data.
BoxyHQ's answer:
BoxyHQ stands out for several reasons:
BoxyHQ's answer:
BoxyHQ's primary audience encompasses:
BoxyHQ's answer:
The inception of BoxyHQ is deeply linked with Deepak's journey as the former CTO of a cybersecurity scaleup. In his role, Deepak wrestled with the challenge of allocating resources to enterprise compliance features that diverged from their core value proposition. Alongside Sama, they witnessed the escalating tide of cyber crimes, compounded by the concerning statistic that around 70% of development teams often bypass essential security measures due to time constraints. Motivated by this shared purpose of bringing security earlier in the developer live cycle, they embarked on a mission to address these challenges head-on. BoxyHQ emerged as a solution designed to automate product security and provide low-code APIs for seamless integration, empowering developers to implement enterprise-compliant security measures effortlessly. Through BoxyHQ, Deepak and the team strive to alleviate the burden on development teams while fortifying organizations against the escalating threats posed by cyber crimes.
BoxyHQ's answer:
We value the confidentiality of our large enterprise clients due to NDA agreements. However, some of our notable customers include Cal.com, Dub, Supademo, Spike, among many others.
BoxyHQ's answer:
BoxyHQ uses the following technologies: - Next.js - PostgreSQL - Docker - Kubernetes
Based on our record, Okta seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 6 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
The majority of the codebases I've worked on over the years have always favoured using JSON web-tokens (JWT) or Authentication-as-a-Service platforms (Auth0, Okta etc) for authentication logic. These are indeed excellent choices! however, on smaller projects I find these to always seem to be overkill. Recently I started working on a chrome extension that performs social sign-in using twitter OAuth API and... - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
This happened to me three days ago! A new employee had trouble logging into our intranet, which is at OurCompanyName.okta.com. He was going to okta.com. Source: over 1 year ago
Maybe go to okta.com , they have some cool solutions, might give you some ideas. Source: over 2 years ago
Okta.com is being used by gamestop to power the login to the creator platform. their favicon is a dark blue circle. Source: over 2 years ago
The email field is used for domains which have set up Okta, Onelogin, or other specialized identity providers. The login page has to redirect you not just to a single okta.com/onelogin.com/etc authenticator as it does with Google/Microsoft/GitHub, but to the specific OAuth endpoint set up for the specific domain. So it needs to know what domain you're trying to authenticate against so it can redirect you to the... Source: over 2 years ago
Auth0 - Auth0 is a program for people to get authentication and authorization services for their own business use.
OneLogin - On-demand SSO, directory integration, user provisioning and more
Skyflow - Skyflow’s data privacy vaults deliver security, compliance and governance via a simple API
Microsoft Azure Active Directory - Azure Active Directory is a comprehensive identity and access management cloud solution that provides a robust set of capabilities to manage users and groups and help secure access to applications including Microsoft online services like Office 365 …
Frontegg - Elegant user management, tailor-made for B2B SaaS
Ping Identity - Ping Identity provides cloud-based, single sign-on and identity management solutions with their SAML SSO.