Octopress VS Sitecake

[translated from Traditional Chinese] I think every Octopress user must have such troubles — as the number of articles increases, the speed of file creation becomes slower and slower. This site has grown to 54 articles, and it takes at least one minute to create a file every time. - Source: dev.to / about 2 years ago

Jekyll is quite specific for blogs and I think theming or adding/removing features it is not going to be trivial. I remember there was this thing on top of jekyll (octopress) that was just a nightmare to configure, and that was because jekyll was just a very simple tool. Source: about 2 years ago

Use something like this? CMS that generates static html? https://sitecake.com/. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago

I think that user experience of website builders with wysiwyg and drag and drop UX won over time. Then, as time passed by, website builders become bloated and complex. Once again you needed a professional to maintain your site in site builder. So now simple solutions, static HTML, free or one-time fee CMSs are sexy again. (economy is not good, who wants another subscription?) I know because 14 years ago we have... - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago

Https://sitecake.com/ works with simple html and PHP sites.... Veeeerrrry simple for client edits. Source: over 2 years ago

May be a suitable use case for https://sitecake.com/. Source: over 2 years ago

Other than that: Inline Editing CMS examples: Coast CMS, all you need to do is make the html editable with some classes and you're done. The CMS is kind of outdated though. Other examples: simplyedit.io, surrealcms.com, jocms.net, inlinecms.com, sitecake.com. Source: about 3 years ago