Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Octalsoft CTMS VS OnCore

Compare Octalsoft CTMS VS OnCore and see what are their differences

Octalsoft CTMS logo Octalsoft CTMS

Octalsoft CTMS provides a single, centralized system to manage sponsor and Clinical Research Organization study management activities.

OnCore logo OnCore

OnCore Enterprise Research system supports efficient processes at academic medical centers, cancer centers, and health care systems.
  • Octalsoft CTMS Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-12-25
  • OnCore Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-03-26

Octalsoft CTMS features and specs

  • Comprehensive Integration
    Octalsoft CTMS offers seamless integration with other systems such as EDC, eTMF, and ERP, enhancing data consistency across platforms and improving workflow efficiency.
  • User-Friendly Interface
    The platform is designed with an intuitive user interface that simplifies navigation, making it easier for users to manage and access clinical trial data with minimal training.
  • Real-Time Tracking
    Provides real-time visibility into clinical trial progress, allowing users to monitor patient enrollment, site performance, and other critical trial metrics effectively.
  • Customization and Flexibility
    Offers customization options that allow organizations to tailor the system according to specific needs, ensuring adaptability to various clinical trial processes and protocols.
  • Regulatory Compliance
    Supports compliance with regulatory standards such as FDA, EMA, and ICH-GCP, helping organizations maintain data integrity and meet industry regulations.

Possible disadvantages of Octalsoft CTMS

  • Implementation Complexity
    The implementation process can be complex and time-consuming, requiring significant effort and planning to integrate with existing systems and processes effectively.
  • Cost
    The investment required for Octalsoft CTMS can be substantial, making it potentially less accessible for smaller enterprises with limited budgets.
  • Learning Curve
    Despite its user-friendly design, the comprehensive features of the system may still present a learning curve for some users, necessitating additional training and support.
  • Customization Challenges
    While customization options exist, making extensive customizations can be complex and may require support from technical experts, potentially leading to increased costs and time delays.

OnCore features and specs

  • Comprehensive Functionality
    OnCore offers a wide range of features, including protocol management, subject tracking, financial management, and reporting, designed to streamline the clinical trial process.
  • Integration Capability
    The system can integrate with other platforms and electronic health records (EHRs), facilitating seamless data flow across different systems involved in clinical trials.
  • Regulatory Compliance
    OnCore ensures compliance with regulatory requirements, helping institutions maintain adherence to industry standards and avoid potential legal and financial penalties.
  • Customizable Workflows
    Users can customize the workflows to better match their specific clinical trial processes, making the system flexible to different institutional needs.
  • Enhanced Collaboration
    OnCore promotes better collaboration among different stakeholders, including researchers, administrators, and finance departments, by providing a centralized platform for data and communication.

Possible disadvantages of OnCore

  • High Implementation Costs
    The initial setup and ongoing maintenance costs can be high, potentially making it less accessible for smaller research sites or institutions with limited budgets.
  • Complexity
    Due to its comprehensive nature, the system can be complex and may require extensive training for users to become proficient, which can be time-consuming.
  • Customization Challenges
    While customization is a feature, it can be challenging and may require additional time and technical expertise to tailor the system to specific institutional needs.
  • Dependency on Technical Support
    Users may frequently need to rely on technical support for troubleshooting and system management, which could add to the operational costs and time delays.
  • Data Migration Issues
    Migrating legacy data into OnCore can be difficult, involving complex procedures to ensure data accuracy and completeness during the transition.

Octalsoft CTMS videos

No Octalsoft CTMS videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

OnCore videos

OnCore ELIXR - Guerrilla Golf Ball Testing vs Pro-V1

More videos:

  • Review - Best Golf Ball - OnCore Review - Wendell CC - Golf Test Dummy
  • Review - ONCORE ELIXR: Golf Ball Review

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Octalsoft CTMS and OnCore)
Clinical Trial Management System
Text Messaging
11 11%
89% 89
SMS Surveys
9 9%
91% 91
CTMS
15 15%
85% 85

User comments

Share your experience with using Octalsoft CTMS and OnCore. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Octalsoft CTMS and OnCore, you can also consider the following products

eAdjudication - eAdjudication is a cloud software solution designed to manage endpoint adjudication in an effective and quality controlled environment.

OpenClinica - OpenClinica is an open source clinical trials software.

SMART-TRIAL - SMART-TRIAL is designed for medical device manufacturers who need to generate, store, and share clinical evidence. 

Castor EDC - Castor offers you a user-friendly and fully featured application for electronic data collection.

Medidata CTMS - Medidata CTMS seamlessly integrates with Medidata Rave to provide real-time views into study progress without manual tracking.

secuTrial - Electronic Data Capture – Simple.