Software Alternatives & Reviews

NSQ VS ubus

Compare NSQ VS ubus and see what are their differences

NSQ logo NSQ

A realtime distributed messaging platform.

ubus logo ubus

User space inter process communication that adheres to the Unix philosophy.
  • NSQ Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-07
Not present

NSQ videos

GopherCon 2014 Spray Some NSQ On It by Matt Reiferson

More videos:

ubus videos

UNBOXING AND REVIEW NESTLE SMARTIES | Nestle Smarties | Ubus world

More videos:

  • Review - UBus - Nosso destino é você quem faz

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to NSQ and ubus)
Stream Processing
65 65%
35% 35
Data Integration
65 65%
35% 35
Web Service Automation
61 61%
39% 39
ETL
50 50%
50% 50

User comments

Share your experience with using NSQ and ubus. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare NSQ and ubus

NSQ Reviews

NATS vs RabbitMQ vs NSQ vs Kafka | Gcore
NSQ is designed with a distributed architecture around the concept of topics, which allows messages to be organized and distributed across the cluster. To ensure reliable delivery, NSQ replicates each message across multiple nodes within the NSQ cluster. This means that if a node fails or there’s a disruption in the network, the message can still be delivered to its intended...
Source: gcore.com

ubus Reviews

We have no reviews of ubus yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, NSQ seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 7 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

NSQ mentions (7)

  • Any thoughts on using Redis to extend Go's channels across application / machine boundaries?
    (G)NATS can do millions of messages per second and is the right tool for the job (either that or NSQ). Redis isn't even the fastest Redis protocol implementation, KeyDB significantly outperforms it. Source: about 1 year ago
  • FileWave: Why we moved from ZeroMQ to NATS
    Bit.ly's NSQ is also an excellent message queue option. Source: about 1 year ago
  • Infinite loop pattern to poll for a queue in a REST server app
    Queue consumers are interesting because there are many solutions for them, from using Redis and persisting the data in a data store - but for fast and scalable the approach I would take is something like SQS (as I advocate AWS even free tier) or NSQ for managing your own distributed producers and consumers. Source: over 1 year ago
  • What are pros and cons of Go?
    Distrubition server engine ( for example websocket server multi ws gateway and worker pool,nsq.io realtime message queue and so on). Source: almost 2 years ago
  • Distributed IM Service in Golang
    NSQ is a message queue implemented by Golang, and all messages are routed through NSQ. Reasons for choosing NSQ compared to other MQs: decentralized distribution (direct connection between production and consumption), low latency, No ordering, high performance, simple binary protocol. - Source: dev.to / about 2 years ago
View more

ubus mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of ubus yet. Tracking of ubus recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing NSQ and ubus, you can also consider the following products

ZeroMQ - ZeroMQ is a high-performance asynchronous messaging library.

RabbitMQ - RabbitMQ is an open source message broker software.

D-Bus - D-Bus is a message bus system, a simple way for applications to talk to one another.

nanomsg - nanomsg is a socket library that provides several common communication patterns.

Apache Kafka - Apache Kafka is an open-source message broker project developed by the Apache Software Foundation written in Scala.

Apache ActiveMQ - Apache ActiveMQ is an open source messaging and integration patterns server.