No now.sh videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.
Based on our record, GitHub Pages seems to be a lot more popular than now.sh. While we know about 466 links to GitHub Pages, we've tracked only 8 mentions of now.sh. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
I'm open minded to how to display it. I was thinking to do a few website (either through s3 or static site (render, now.sh, netlify, surge, firebase, etc), or even just displaying through some kind of already built system? Source: over 1 year ago
Fly.io - SSS tier for ease of use. (reminds me of the old vercel when it was now.sh but better). Source: about 2 years ago
I think you are correct, but the reason we went with this domain name because when the project first started a few years ago, it was deployed on "now.sh" by ZEIT (now they rebranded to Vercel). And the app domain name was https://hat.now.sh . So when we decided to get a domain, we wanted to choose something that won't take away from the original address so much. And we kind of liked the 3 letters domain LOL.... Source: over 2 years ago
Our goal with Ray is to make distributed computing as easy as possible. To do that, we think the serverless direction, which allows people to just focus on their code and not on infrastructure, is very important. I watched https://now.sh/ deteriorate from a simple, lovely CLI into a dystopian mess due to their push for serverless. They abandoned all other approaches and forced people to use it. Far from... - Source: Hacker News / almost 3 years ago
Once we are done with development we can build the app and we can host that build files in any static web host sites like Amazon S3, Netlify, Github pages, now.sh and many more... - Source: dev.to / almost 3 years ago
For this application, Elm controlled the routing. So, I had to adapt the scripts to deploy to Netlify instead of GitHub Pages. Why? Because you need to be able to tell the web server to redirect all relevant requests to the application. GitHub Pages doesn't have support for it. - Source: dev.to / 11 days ago
It's super easy to publish a static site like the resume with GitHub Pages. Just check out the docs. - Source: dev.to / about 1 month ago
GitHub Pages: Host your static websites directly from your GitHub repository. - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago
As per many other comments, it sounds like a static site generator like Hugo (https://gohugo.io/) or Jekyll (https://jekyllrb.com/), hosted on GitHub Pages (https://pages.github.com/) or GitLab Pages (https://about.gitlab.com/stages-devops-lifecycle/pages/), would be a good match. If you set up GitHub Actions or GitLab CI/CD to do the build and deploy (see e.g.... - Source: Hacker News / 3 months ago
Ideal for open source projects, docs sites, and portfolios. GitHub Pages. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
surge.sh - Static website hosting for front-end developers.
Vercel - Vercel is the platform for frontend developers, providing the speed and reliability innovators need to create at the moment of inspiration.
tiiny.host - The simplest way to share your web project.
Jekyll - Jekyll is a simple, blog aware, static site generator.
Netlify - Build, deploy and host your static site or app with a drag and drop interface and automatic delpoys from GitHub or Bitbucket
Bip.sh - The super fast static website hosting platform.