Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Notepad3 VS Jekyll

Compare Notepad3 VS Jekyll and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Notepad3 logo Notepad3

Notepad3 is a fast and light-weight Scintilla-based text editor with syntax highlighting.

Jekyll logo Jekyll

Jekyll is a simple, blog aware, static site generator.
  • Notepad3 Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-07
  • Jekyll Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-01-17

Notepad3 features and specs

  • Lightweight
    Notepad3 is a streamlined and lightweight text editor, which makes it quick to launch and easy on system resources.
  • Rich Feature Set
    Despite being lightweight, Notepad3 includes advanced features such as syntax highlighting, code folding, and search and replace functionality.
  • Portable
    The application can be run from a USB drive without needing installation, providing flexibility and ease of use on different machines.
  • Customization
    Notepad3 offers a high degree of customization, from themes and color schemes to keyboard shortcuts, which helps tailor the editor to individual needs.
  • Open Source
    Notepad3 being open-source software means the community can contribute to its development and ensure it remains free and flexible.

Possible disadvantages of Notepad3

  • Limited Language Support
    While Notepad3 supports syntax highlighting for many languages, it may not support some lesser-known or niche programming languages.
  • Basic Plugin Support
    Compared to more robust text editors like VSCode or Sublime Text, Notepad3 has limited plugin support, which might restrict expanding its functionality.
  • No Integrated Debugger
    Notepad3 lacks an integrated debugger, which can be a drawback for developers looking for a comprehensive development environment.
  • No Collaboration Features
    Unlike some modern text editors, Notepad3 does not offer built-in collaboration tools, which could be a disadvantage for team projects.
  • Windows Only
    Notepad3 is only available for Windows, limiting its use for developers who work on other operating systems like macOS or Linux.

Jekyll features and specs

  • Speed and Performance
    Jekyll generates static websites, which means they load faster compared to dynamic websites. No database queries are required, reducing server overhead and improving performance.
  • Security
    Static sites have a smaller attack surface compared to dynamic sites because they don't rely on databases or server-side code. This means fewer vectors for potential compromises.
  • Simplicity
    Jekyll setups are relatively straightforward, especially if you are comfortable writing in Markdown and HTML. This can make it easier to manage and maintain your website.
  • Integration with GitHub Pages
    Jekyll is designed to work seamlessly with GitHub Pages, allowing you to host your website for free with automatic deployment directly from your GitHub repository.
  • Customizability
    Jekyll allows for extensive customization through its support for plugins, themes, and templates. This can be helpful to create a unique look and functionality for your website.

Possible disadvantages of Jekyll

  • Learning Curve
    While Jekyll is simpler than some other static site generators, it does require some familiarity with the command line, version control (Git), and YAML configuration.
  • Build Time
    For large websites, the build times can become lengthy, which can slow down the development process, especially if you are making frequent updates.
  • Lack of Real-time Content Updates
    Since Jekyll generates static sites, real-time content updates (e.g., comments, dynamic forms) aren't natively supported and require third-party services or additional tooling.
  • Dependence on Ruby
    Jekyll is built with Ruby, so you will need to have Ruby installed and occasionally deal with Ruby-specific issues. This might be a drawback for developers who are not familiar with the Ruby ecosystem.
  • Limited Built-in Functionality
    While Jekyll is very flexible, it doesn’t have built-in support for many features out of the box, which might require you to manually implement or rely on plugins.

Analysis of Notepad3

Overall verdict

  • Overall, Notepad3 is considered a good choice for users looking for a fast and efficient text editor with additional features that improve upon the basic Notepad, particularly if they need programming language support.

Why this product is good

  • Notepad3 is praised for its simplicity, lightweight design, and enhanced features over the standard Notepad. It supports syntax highlighting for a variety of programming languages, search and replace functionality, and has a customizable UI. These features make it appealing for developers and those who need a quick editing tool without the bloat of larger IDEs.

Recommended for

    Notepad3 is recommended for developers, coders, and advanced users who require a lightweight text editor with enhanced functionality, as well as for anyone looking for a more feature-rich alternative to the default Notepad application.

Analysis of Jekyll

Overall verdict

  • Jekyll is a good choice for individuals and organizations looking for a straightforward, reliable, and efficient way to build static websites. Its strengths include simplicity, flexibility, and strong community support, which contribute to a smooth development experience.

Why this product is good

  • Jekyll is a popular static site generator that is widely appreciated for its simplicity, speed, and ease of use. It is particularly suited for creating blogs and simple websites, leveraging Markdown and Liquid templates to generate static HTML content. Its integration with GitHub Pages also makes it a convenient choice for developers and non-developers alike who want to host their sites directly from their GitHub repositories without additional setup or cost.

Recommended for

  • Bloggers and content creators looking for a simple way to publish content online.
  • Developers who prefer writing in Markdown and managing content with a version control system.
  • Users who want to host their sites for free using GitHub Pages.
  • Anyone in need of a static site generator that is easy to set up, customize, and maintain with minimal resources.

Notepad3 videos

No Notepad3 videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Jekyll videos

Getting Started With Jekyll, The Static Site Generator

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Notepad3 and Jekyll)
Text Editors
100 100%
0% 0
CMS
0 0%
100% 100
IDE
100 100%
0% 0
Blogging
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Notepad3 and Jekyll. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Notepad3 and Jekyll

Notepad3 Reviews

We have no reviews of Notepad3 yet.
Be the first one to post

Jekyll Reviews

Best Gitbook Alternatives You Need to Try in 2023
Jekyll is a static site generator often used to create blogs and websites, similar to Gitbook in its ability to generate documentation from markdown files. Jekyll is built in Ruby and is known for its flexibility and ease of use. It also has a large community and a wide variety of plugins and themes available. Jekyll's main advantage is that it is highly customizable,...
Source: www.archbee.com
11 Popular Free And Open Source WordPress CMS alternatives in 2021
Unlike some listed alternatives, Jekyll is also a static site generator so it lays in the same category. It uses Ruby and we would say it's simpler, free, and open-source CMS software.
Source: medevel.com
10 static site generators to watch in 2021
Perhaps most conveniently described as Jekyll implemented with JavaScript rather than Ruby, Eleventy has now moved beyond that while retaining a clear and simple on-ramp, and only shipping to the browser what you tell it too. As with Jekyll and Hugo, no JavaScript frameworks are auto-baked in.
Source: www.netlify.com
Hugo vs Jekyll: an Epic Battle of Static Site Generator Themes
Jekyll isn’t strict with its content location. It expects pages in the root of your site, and will build whatever’s there. Here’s how you might organize these pages in your Jekyll site root:
9 Reasons I Think Craft is the Best CMS on the Market Today
Craft CMS is simple, minimalistic, agile and has every capability a modern CMS framework needs. Over the past ten years we have worked with every CMS you could think of (Wordpress, Drupal, Rails+ActiveAdmin, Ghost, Weebly, DjangoCMS, Jekyll, Joomla, Tumblr, Squarespace, Expression Engine, Statamic, Blogger)… here are the reasons why we’ve landed firmly with Craft as our №1...
Source: hackernoon.com

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Jekyll seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 196 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Notepad3 mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Notepad3 yet. Tracking of Notepad3 recommendations started around Mar 2021.

Jekyll mentions (196)

  • Jekyll auto posts from YouTube feeds
    I wanted to automate this boring and repetitive workflow: my idea is that every Time a YouTube video is published on my channel I want to have an associated Post on my personal Jekyll blog. - Source: dev.to / about 23 hours ago
  • Building PicoSSG: 'Just Enough Code'
    The static site generator (SSG) landscape is crowded with feature-rich but increasingly complex solutions. As I looked at and used tools like lume, 11ty, lektor, or jekyll, I found myself drowning in configuration options, plugins, and middleware. What started as a simple desire to convert Markdown content into HTML had evolved into learning complex frameworks with steep learning curves. - Source: dev.to / about 1 month ago
  • How to create a blog with Quartz, GitHub, and Cloudflare
    If you don't want to use Jekyll as your static site generator for GitHub Pages and you want to have a custom domain for your GitHub Pages. This post is for you! - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago
  • Blogging with Obsidian and Jekyll
    Jekyll is a static site generator that transforms Markdown files into a fully functional website. Everything is generated into plain HTML, which makes it simple to deploy on platforms like GitHub Pages. - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago
  • Create a Blogging Platform With No Backend (Zero Hosting Fee)
    Obviously, there are a dozen choices for generating static websites (efficiently and quickly), from the classic Jekyll to the new Next.js. And you are good to go with any of them as long as your confident with it. I choose 11ty because:. - Source: dev.to / 5 months ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Notepad3 and Jekyll, you can also consider the following products

Notepad++ - A free source code editor which supports several programming languages running under the MS Windows environment.

Hugo - Hugo is a general-purpose website framework for generating static web pages.

Sublime Text - Sublime Text is a sophisticated text editor for code, html and prose - any kind of text file. You'll love the slick user interface and extraordinary features. Fully customizable with macros, and syntax highlighting for most major languages.

Ghost - Ghost is a fully open source, adaptable platform for building and running a modern online publication. We power blogs, magazines and journalists from Zappos to Sky News.

VS Code - Build and debug modern web and cloud applications, by Microsoft

WordPress - WordPress is web software you can use to create a beautiful website or blog. We like to say that WordPress is both free and priceless at the same time.