Software Alternatives & Reviews

NoScript VS Cover Your Tracks

Compare NoScript VS Cover Your Tracks and see what are their differences

NoScript logo NoScript

NoScript for Firefox pre-emptively blocks malicious scripts and allows JavaScript, Java and other potentially dangerous content only from sites you trust. Download it now for free! - what is it?

Cover Your Tracks logo Cover Your Tracks

Cover Your Tracks is a website that comes with an agile approach for the users to test the privacy of add-ons with best-in-class tools and techniques with complete online support.
  • NoScript Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-06-25
  • Cover Your Tracks Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-02-05

NoScript videos

Get MAXIMUM online privacy and security with Noscript | How to use NoScript tutorial

More videos:

  • Review - NoScript | Web Browser Extension | Review | Mozilla Firefox
  • Tutorial - How to use NoScript (2019)

Cover Your Tracks videos

Cover Your Tracks -- A New Series About Dream Cover Art Collabs

More videos:

  • Review - COVER YOUR TRACKS: KTLYN x ALLBLCK
  • Review - COVER YOUR TRACKS: Serayah x Raven B. Varona

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to NoScript and Cover Your Tracks)
Security & Privacy
32 32%
68% 68
Ad Blockers
100 100%
0% 0
Software Marketplace
0 0%
100% 100
Privacy
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using NoScript and Cover Your Tracks. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Cover Your Tracks should be more popular than NoScript. It has been mentiond 251 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

NoScript mentions (53)

  • What It's Like to Use Apple's Lockdown Mode
    You should check out https://noscript.net/. - Source: Hacker News / 4 months ago
  • Is javascript always bad?
    Good or bad depends on the intentions of the website you're visiting, and unfortunately also of the many 3rd party script sources it includes. Users should have a chance to decide which sites they trust to run JavaScript and which they do not, and this is the reason why 18 years ago I've created NoScript, and why it is still there and shipped by default inside the Tor Browser. Source: 5 months ago
  • PSA: We're all ripe for phishing attempts while looking for Reddit alternatives
    Use a different name, password, and email if you can. Keep an adblocker and noscript handy. Don't accept cookies from new sites. Maybe even use the TOR browser for better anonymity and safety while you're giving these new platforms a test run. Source: 11 months ago
  • Ask HN: Browsing the web with JavaScript turned off?
    I do (with the NoScript browser extension: https://noscript.net/). The main reason is to reduce my attack surface. A secondary benefit is it eliminates most ads and other annoying distractions. - Source: Hacker News / 11 months ago
  • GitHub Stars as a FOSS Metrics? 🤔
    I'll give an example of NoScript which is a great project that you should be using. Most people download the extension directly though their browser. Firefox shows 317,244 active users and Chromium shows 100,000+ users. Some people know of the website. Less people know of the GitHub project the NoScript Common Library (nscl). NoScript has 645 stars and nscl has 15 stars. 417,244+ active users and only 660 stars.... Source: 12 months ago
View more

Cover Your Tracks mentions (251)

  • Mozilla Drops Onerep After CEO Admits to Running People-Search Networks
    Go here and see for yourself: https://coveryourtracks.eff.org. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 month ago
  • The /unblock API from Browserless: dodging bot detection as a service
    I'm sure that happens, but I haven't done any work with gyro data myself. There's similar logic for mouse cursor movements, there are libraries out there that will generate a natural looking curve that moves the cursor from one position to another, with imperfections that emulate human hand movement. > Why do we even need an actual device? We can emulate if we even need to and set our headers to look like we're... - Source: Hacker News / 2 months ago
  • Kagi search reached 20k paying members
    Unfortunately, your fingerprint is more than likely unique either way: https://coveryourtracks.eff.org/. - Source: Hacker News / 3 months ago
  • Google Is Tracking You Even in Incognito Mode, New Disclaimer Is Up
    Visit EFF's Panopticlick to learn more. https://coveryourtracks.eff.org/. - Source: Hacker News / 3 months ago
  • 48,000 companies sent Facebook data on a single person
    You are. Compare the fingerprints of your two browsers: https://amiunique.org, https://coveryourtracks.eff.org. Very likely, the fingerprints are very similar. For anonymity, use Tor. - Source: Hacker News / 3 months ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing NoScript and Cover Your Tracks, you can also consider the following products

Ghostery - Privacy tool for transparency and control

privacytools.io - You are being watched.

uBlock Origin - Popular and efficient blocker for Chromium, Chrome, Edge, Firefox, Opera, Safari, Thunderbird.

BrowserLeaks.com - BrowserLeaks.com is a website that checks how much private information your web browser is leaking...

Privacy Badger - Privacy Badger blocks spying ads and invisible trackers. How is Privacy Badger different from Disconnect, Adblock Plus, Ghostery, and other blocking extensions?

DNS leak test - Test your connection for DNS leaks.