Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Node.js on App Engine VS surge.sh

Compare Node.js on App Engine VS surge.sh and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Node.js on App Engine logo Node.js on App Engine

Fully managed Node.js serverless application platform

surge.sh logo surge.sh

Static website hosting for front-end developers.
  • Node.js on App Engine Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-03-20
  • surge.sh Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-10-20

Node.js on App Engine features and specs

  • Scalability
    App Engine provides automatic scaling, which means your Node.js application can handle increased traffic by scaling up and scales down when the traffic decreases.
  • Fully Managed
    App Engine manages the infrastructure for you, including server configuration and management, allowing developers to focus on code rather than infrastructure.
  • Integrated Google Cloud Services
    Node.js on App Engine can easily integrate with other Google Cloud services like Cloud Datastore, Cloud SQL, and more, fostering rich and scalable application development.
  • Built-in Security Features
    App Engine provides built-in security features to protect your Node.js application including Identity and Access Management (IAM) and integration with Google’s security infrastructure.
  • Cost Efficiency
    The pay-per-use model ensures that you only pay for what you use, which can be cost-effective for applications with variable workloads.

Possible disadvantages of Node.js on App Engine

  • Cold Start Latency
    Like many serverless environments, Node.js applications on App Engine might experience latency due to cold starts, especially after periods of inactivity.
  • Vendor Lock-In
    Deploying on App Engine might lead to a certain level of dependency on Google Cloud’s ecosystem, making it challenging to migrate to another cloud provider without significant changes.
  • Limited Customization
    Being a fully managed service, there are limits to how much you can customize the runtime environment compared to traditional server instances.
  • Complex Pricing Model
    Understanding App Engine's pricing model can be complex, which could make cost estimation difficult, particularly without a clear forecast of usage patterns.
  • Resource Constraints
    Given that App Engine standard environment has specific resource constraints and quotas, this might not be suitable for applications with high memory or CPU demands.

surge.sh features and specs

  • Ease of Use
    Surge.sh offers a simple and intuitive interface for developers to deploy static websites quickly with a minimal learning curve.
  • Free Tier
    It provides a generous free tier, allowing developers to deploy sites without cost, which is beneficial for hobby projects or initial development stages.
  • Custom Domain
    Surge.sh supports custom domains, giving users the ability to deploy their site under a personalized web address easily.
  • Instant Deployment
    Deployments on Surge.sh are incredibly fast, often taking just seconds, which enhances productivity and reduces downtime.
  • HTTPS Support
    It includes built-in HTTPS support, ensuring that sites are secure without the need for manual SSL certificate management.

Possible disadvantages of surge.sh

  • Static Sites Only
    Surge.sh is designed specifically for static sites, so it does not support server-side logic, databases, or back-end functionality.
  • Limited Configuration Options
    It offers fewer customization options compared to other more complex deployment services, potentially limiting flexibility for advanced use cases.
  • File Size Limits
    There are file size and total site size limitations, which could be restrictive for large projects or media-heavy websites.
  • No Built-in CI/CD
    Surge.sh lacks integrated continuous integration and continuous deployment (CI/CD) workflows, which are available in other services like Netlify and Vercel.
  • Dependency on Third-Party Services for Enhancements
    For added features like backend services, developers will need to integrate third-party services, which could complicate the deployment architecture.

Node.js on App Engine videos

No Node.js on App Engine videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

surge.sh videos

Introducing Surge

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Node.js on App Engine and surge.sh)
Developer Tools
100 100%
0% 0
Static Site Generators
0 0%
100% 100
Productivity
100 100%
0% 0
Website Builder
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Node.js on App Engine and surge.sh. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, surge.sh seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 26 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Node.js on App Engine mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Node.js on App Engine yet. Tracking of Node.js on App Engine recommendations started around Mar 2021.

surge.sh mentions (26)

View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Node.js on App Engine and surge.sh, you can also consider the following products

Serverless - Toolkit for building serverless applications

GitHub Pages - A free, static web host for open-source projects on GitHub

Vercel - Vercel is the platform for frontend developers, providing the speed and reliability innovators need to create at the moment of inspiration.

tiiny.host - The simplest way to share your web project.

Webiny - The Enterprise CMS platform that you can host on your cloud

CTO.ai - Build, share & run developer workflows in the CLI + Slack