Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

nix-bundle VS AppImageKit

Compare nix-bundle VS AppImageKit and see what are their differences

nix-bundle logo nix-bundle

Build portable binaries using the nix package manager that can run anywhere (even when nix is not installed) .

AppImageKit logo AppImageKit

Linux apps that run anywhere
  • nix-bundle Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-08-24
  • AppImageKit Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-10-18

nix-bundle features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

AppImageKit features and specs

  • Portability
    AppImage packages can run on most Linux distributions without needing to be installed, ensuring compatibility across various systems.
  • Simplicity
    AppImages do not require root permissions to execute, making it simple for end-users to run applications without administrative access.
  • No Installation Required
    Since AppImages are self-contained executables, users don’t need to worry about installation processes, dependencies, or system changes.
  • Isolation
    Applications packaged as AppImages are isolated from the host system which minimizes conflicts with other installed software.
  • Version Control
    Users can have multiple versions of the same application by downloading different AppImage files, allowing easy testing and use of different releases.

Possible disadvantages of AppImageKit

  • Lack of Dependency Management
    Unlike traditional package managers, AppImage does not handle dependency resolution, which can lead to larger file sizes if all dependencies are bundled.
  • Limited Integration
    Out-of-the-box, AppImages may not integrate seamlessly with the host system’s desktop environment in terms of shortcuts and MIME types.
  • Security Concerns
    Because AppImages run with the same permissions as the user executing them, a malicious AppImage could potentially harm the user's system if not properly verified.
  • Updates
    Unlike some other packaging systems, AppImage does not inherently support automatic updates, requiring manual download of new versions.
  • Non-Native Look
    Applications might not look consistent with other native applications as AppImages bundle their dependencies which may not conform to the host’s theme and settings.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to nix-bundle and AppImageKit)
Front End Package Manager
Software Marketplace
25 25%
75% 75
Developer Tools
0 0%
100% 100
Cloud Computing
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using nix-bundle and AppImageKit. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, AppImageKit should be more popular than nix-bundle. It has been mentiond 55 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

nix-bundle mentions (7)

  • Our Fastest, Most Beautiful Release Ever: Thunderbird 115 “Supernova” Is Here
    I admit that there is an element of, "but I chose an obscure and challenging linux variant, waaah why isn't it supported" here, but (a) there's currently no flatpak and (b) when, for goodness sakes, will major linux projects begin packaging for Nix/NixOS as a matter of course? It's not hard, and the benefits go far outside merely supporting Nix, as e.g. a flake.nix file would allow this project to generate docker... - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago
  • Pushing/marketing the nix package manager as a Flatpak/Snap competitor?
    Another way to approach this would be to advocate Nix as the build system for Flatpak or AppImage. Don't know what the status is of nix-bundle, but if it is possible to turn a Nix package into an AppImage with little extra work that would be ideal. Source: over 3 years ago
  • Pushing/marketing the nix package manager as a Flatpak/Snap competitor?
    Somewhat related, I wanted to mention nix-bundler it allows to wrap an application with nix into a single file. Source: over 3 years ago
  • Flaptak (and Snap) is not the future
    Nix itself is more focused on "distribute from this host with nix, to this other host with nix". Though, here is e.g. https://github.com/matthewbauer/nix-bundle, which is supported as an experimental command in nix 2.4. - Source: Hacker News / over 3 years ago
  • Does Nix or NixOS address the problem raised by Linus Torvalds on package management?
    I believe this tool does: https://github.com/matthewbauer/nix-bundle. Source: over 3 years ago
View more

AppImageKit mentions (55)

  • Why Flatpak Apps Use So Much Disk Space on Linux
    The equivalent of "Windows portable apps" on Linux isn't flatpaks (these add a bunch of extra stuff and need some sort of support from the OS) but AppImages[0]. AppImages are still not 100% the same (and can never be as Windows applications can rely on A LOT more stuff to be there than Linux desktop apps) but functionally/UX-wise they're the closest: you download some program, chmod +x it and run it like... - Source: Hacker News / 23 days ago
  • NewPipe on Linux, Using Android_translation_layer
    Exciting. I'd love to see AppImage [0] builds of applications produced with this library. [0] https://appimage.org/. - Source: Hacker News / 7 months ago
  • Show HN: Finic – open-source platform for building browser automations
    Like again if you are not sure, what open source means, this is open source: https://appimage.org/ Hope it is abundantly clear with this example. Docker tried it's best to do the whole open source but business first and it led to disastrous results. At best this will make your company suffer and second guess itself and at worst this is moral fraud. Talk to your group partner about this and explain to them as well. - Source: Hacker News / 8 months ago
  • GoboLinux
    What you're looking for sounds like AppImages (https://appimage.org/) . I have only used them while downloading games from itch.io, etc. (since I prefer package managers) but they seem to work out of the box on popular distros. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
  • Bitwarden Heist – How to Break into Password Vaults Without Using Passwords
    Ideally a new instance of the application is installed for each user. This also provides better isolation if one user upgrades/removes/breaks their application instance. I, for one, have really come around to the AppImage model [0] in the last couple of years. [0] https://appimage.org/. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing nix-bundle and AppImageKit, you can also consider the following products

Flatpak - Flatpak is the new framework for desktop applications on Linux

NixOS - 25 Jun 2014 . All software components in NixOS are installed using the Nix package manager. Packages in Nix are defined using the nix language to create nix expressions.

FLATHUB - Apps for Linux, right here

Zero Install - Zero Install is a decentralised cross-distribution software installation system.

Snapcraft - Snaps are software packages that are simple to create and install.

AppImageHub - AppImage applications for Linux without installation