Software Alternatives & Reviews

Ninja Build VS Yarn

Compare Ninja Build VS Yarn and see what are their differences

Ninja Build logo Ninja Build

Ninja is a small build system with a focus on speed.

Yarn logo Yarn

Yarn is a package manager for your code.
  • Ninja Build Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-09-14
  • Yarn Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-03

Ninja Build videos

FORTNITE STW: HERE IS THE BEST NINJA BUILD (AFTER MONTHS OF TESTING)

Yarn videos

Yarn Snob Reviews New Lion Brand Yarns [A Few Big Hits and Bigger Misses]

More videos:

  • Review - Yarn Review - Lionbrand Vs Caron | Which Do You Choose | Bag-O-Day Crochet Video
  • Review - My First Shipment from Ice Yarns - Comparison & Review | Yay For Yarn

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Ninja Build and Yarn)
Front End Package Manager
JavaScript Package Manager
JS Build Tools
35 35%
65% 65
Developer Tools
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Ninja Build and Yarn. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Yarn should be more popular than Ninja Build. It has been mentiond 107 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Ninja Build mentions (22)

  • TypeScript's Successor is Waiting, and You'll Never Want to Turn Back
    Under the hood, Rescript uses a build system called Ninja. Ninja is similar to Make, but cross-platform and more minimal/performant. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
  • Using Make – writing less Makefile
    Ninja was super easy to pick up even after using make for some time (10+ years). GN is just a ninja generator that is optional. https://gn.googlesource.com/gn/+/main/docs/quick_start.md https://ninja-build.org/. - Source: Hacker News / 4 months ago
  • Ask HN: What outdated tech are you still using and are perfectly happy with?
    Really? I thought most new projects were switching to ninja[^1] and have never used it. [^1]: https://ninja-build.org/. - Source: Hacker News / 7 months ago
  • What was used to build C++ programs before Cmake?
    Ninja showed real promise for a while, but then CMake grew up and people stopped seeing a reason to leave it behind. Source: 10 months ago
  • Building and Running Pidgin and Finch 3
    Now that you have your build system all generated you can go ahead and build everything. By default Meson will use Ninja as the build tool. Ninja is similar to Make but much much faster. You can also generate additional build systems but that's outside of the scope of this post. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
View more

Yarn mentions (107)

View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Ninja Build and Yarn, you can also consider the following products

GNU Make - GNU Make is a tool which controls the generation of executables and other non-source files of a program from the program's source files.

npm - npm is a package manager for Node.

SCons - SCons is an Open Source software construction tool—that is, a next-generation build tool.

Node.js - Node.js is a platform built on Chrome's JavaScript runtime for easily building fast, scalable network applications

Meson - Meson is an open source build system meant to be both extremely fast, and, even more importantly...

Webpack - Webpack is a module bundler. Its main purpose is to bundle JavaScript files for usage in a browser, yet it is also capable of transforming, bundling, or packaging just about any resource or asset.