Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Ninja Build VS Remote Browser Embed

Compare Ninja Build VS Remote Browser Embed and see what are their differences

Ninja Build logo Ninja Build

Ninja is a small build system with a focus on speed.

Remote Browser Embed logo Remote Browser Embed

RemoteHQ’s Remote Browser is a secure and ephemeral browser running in the cloud.
  • Ninja Build Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-09-14
  • Remote Browser Embed Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-04-28

Ninja Build videos

FORTNITE STW: HERE IS THE BEST NINJA BUILD (AFTER MONTHS OF TESTING)

Remote Browser Embed videos

No Remote Browser Embed videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

+ Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Ninja Build and Remote Browser Embed)
Front End Package Manager
Productivity
0 0%
100% 100
JavaScript Package Manager
Design Tools
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Ninja Build and Remote Browser Embed. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Ninja Build seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 22 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Ninja Build mentions (22)

  • TypeScript's Successor is Waiting, and You'll Never Want to Turn Back
    Under the hood, Rescript uses a build system called Ninja. Ninja is similar to Make, but cross-platform and more minimal/performant. - Source: dev.to / 5 months ago
  • Using Make – writing less Makefile
    Ninja was super easy to pick up even after using make for some time (10+ years). GN is just a ninja generator that is optional. https://gn.googlesource.com/gn/+/main/docs/quick_start.md https://ninja-build.org/. - Source: Hacker News / 6 months ago
  • Ask HN: What outdated tech are you still using and are perfectly happy with?
    Really? I thought most new projects were switching to ninja[^1] and have never used it. [^1]: https://ninja-build.org/. - Source: Hacker News / 8 months ago
  • What was used to build C++ programs before Cmake?
    Ninja showed real promise for a while, but then CMake grew up and people stopped seeing a reason to leave it behind. Source: 11 months ago
  • Building and Running Pidgin and Finch 3
    Now that you have your build system all generated you can go ahead and build everything. By default Meson will use Ninja as the build tool. Ninja is similar to Make but much much faster. You can also generate additional build systems but that's outside of the scope of this post. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
View more

Remote Browser Embed mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Remote Browser Embed yet. Tracking of Remote Browser Embed recommendations started around Jul 2022.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Ninja Build and Remote Browser Embed, you can also consider the following products

SCons - SCons is an Open Source software construction tool—that is, a next-generation build tool.

Iteration X - Iteration X allows teams to annotate and edit any live website or web app directly in Chrome.

Meson - Meson is an open source build system meant to be both extremely fast, and, even more importantly...

Brevy (beta) - Give feedback, Google-doc style, directly on your website

GNU Make - GNU Make is a tool which controls the generation of executables and other non-source files of a program from the program's source files.

Flycode - FlyCode (YC S22) makes web apps editable without coding so companies can iterate and release products faster - helping teams edit copy, images, and links in the code so their developers don’t have to.