NIM VS Steel Bank Common Lisp

Compare NIM VS Steel Bank Common Lisp and see what are their differences

Doczilla

Effortlessly create stunning PDFs and screenshots. Seamlessly store them in your own AWS or Google Cloud Storage bucket, putting the control and creativity right at your fingertips. featured

Contents:

» Base Details
» Videos
» Reviews
» Alternatives

NIM

GB64.COM is the home of The Gamebase Collection of C64 games.

Steel Bank Common Lisp

Steel Bank Common Lisp (SBCL) is a high performance Common Lisp compiler.

Landing page //
2021-09-21

Landing page //
2019-04-24

Project Nim - Movie Review

Steel Bank Common Lisp videos

No Steel Bank Common Lisp videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

+ Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to NIM and Steel Bank Common Lisp)

Steel Bank Common Lisp

Programming Language

64 64%

Programming Language

36% 36

OOP

59 59%

OOP

41% 41

IDE

0 0%

IDE

100% 100

Generic Programming Language

100 100%

Generic Programming Language

0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using NIM and Steel Bank Common Lisp. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Steel Bank Common Lisp seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 5 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

NIM mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of NIM yet. Tracking of NIM recommendations started around Mar 2021.

Steel Bank Common Lisp mentions (5)

Not only Clojure – Chez Scheme: Lisp with native code speed
Tangential: if we're talking Lisp and native code speed, Steel Bank Common Lisp (by default) compiles everything to machine code. [0] https://sbcl.org. - Source: Hacker News / 7 months ago
A few newbie questions about lisp
Q5: Get http://sbcl.org/. Install https://quicklisp.org/. SBCL is the implementation that's the lowest friction, and Quicklisp is a package manager that's almost* painless. Source: 12 months ago
[C++20][safety] static_assert is all you need (no leaks, no UB)
That is what we do in Lisp. Try sbcl if you haven't tried it yet. Source: about 1 year ago
Trying to wrap my head around `xbps-src`
I want to add the sbcl-doc subpackage (the manual for SBCL in GNU Info format), but first I need to understand how to write package definitions. As far as I understand there are the "templates" which are shell scripts that describe how a package is to be built and installed, and xbps-src is a shell script which can process these templates to actually carry out the work. Source: over 2 years ago
Ask HN: Areas in Programming to Avoid
> Lisp looks like Python, that's far from C, and usually it's a "interpreted" language, far from machine the currently most popular Common Lisp implementation is based around an optimizing native code compiler. That compiler has its roots in the early 80s. See https://sbcl.org . It's far away from being 'interpreted'. - Source: Hacker News / almost 3 years ago