Nhost VS Porter

Nhost.io - Serverless backend for web and mobile apps. The free plan includes PostgreSQL, GraphQL (Hasura), Authentication, Storage, and Serverless Functions. - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago

Only caveat I say is make sure there's something in it for you; if it's 2 AM it better be mostly for self-benefit. I'm busy constructing a monorepo with the latest technology with NX and pnpm and a half dozen other technologies (I recommend checking out http://nhost.io/); at the end I will build whatever I want and maybe make money. It's not done for the good of someone else exclusively that's for sure. Source: about 1 year ago

I'm really digging nhost and apollo-client. Source: about 1 year ago

Backend Frontend Database pick two or even one. Maybe something like this. Source: over 1 year ago

I am trying to use basic authentication of nhost.io . Source: over 1 year ago

Https://getporter.org/ https://getporter.dev/ One of you is going to have to rename yourselves... - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago

Porter - a fully-managed PaaS that lets teams automate DevOps. The free basic tier for porter cloud offers management of 1 cluster with up to 10 vCPU and 20 GB memory. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago

There are some YC startups (AtomizedHq.com and getporter.dev) that are doing really interesting things with cross-cloud K8S deployments (more like heroku). These are all different bits of the serverless microservices scaling puzzle. We are a long way off but trying to think long term, even as a 2 person alpha prototype :). Source: almost 3 years ago

But then I saw a YC startup called Porter (https://getporter.dev) that made getting the cluster set up and deploying the apps from Heroku on AWS EKS a piece of cake. It's really great. There is another YC startup called Atomized (https://atomizedhq.com) that I've been looking at that's also really great. They are both worth checking out, and the teams from both are super-responsive. Source: almost 3 years ago