Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Next.js VS LT Browser by Lambdatest

Compare Next.js VS LT Browser by Lambdatest and see what are their differences

Next.js logo Next.js

A small framework for server-rendered universal JavaScript apps

LT Browser by Lambdatest logo LT Browser by Lambdatest

LT Browser is a free dev friendly browser for developers and testers. You can see mobile view of website on different screen sizes and resolution on 50+ pre installed view ports. You can build, test and debug your website faster then ever.
  • Next.js Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-06-19
  • LT Browser by Lambdatest Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-11

With LT Browser, you can see mobile view of website on different screen sizes and resolution. With over 50+ devices to choose from, mobile website test hasn't been much easier. Use LT Browser and ensure that your website is mobile responsive. You can create your own custom devices and save it for future uses. Create new mobile, tablet or desktop devices and test website on various devices, screen resolution and perform screen resolution test for website on different screen sizes. You don’t have to switch between two devices to perform mobile website test. Test on two devices simultaneously with LT Browser and perform mobile website test on different tablet and desktop devices and inspect website on different resolution and resolution simultaneously. LT Browser comes with Dev Tool to debug multiple devices while performing responsiveness test on your devices simultaneously. Test website on various devices simultaneously with separate Dev Tools for each device.

Next.js features and specs

  • Server-Side Rendering (SSR)
    Next.js supports SSR, allowing pages to be rendered on the server-side before being sent to the client. This results in improved SEO and faster initial page loads.
  • Static Site Generation (SSG)
    Enables pre-rendering pages at build time, which can further improve performance and scalability while allowing for dynamic generation when needed.
  • API Routes
    Next.js allows you to build API endpoints directly in the application, simplifying the process of creating back-end services and endpoints.
  • File-Based Routing
    Offers a simple file-based routing mechanism where the file structure maps directly to the app’s routes, making it easier to manage and understand.
  • Automatic Code Splitting
    Automatically splits code at the page level, reducing the initial load time and improving performance by only loading necessary JavaScript.
  • TypeScript Support
    Built-in support for TypeScript, allowing developers to use static type checking and other TypeScript features easily.
  • Developer Experience
    Provides a great developer experience with features like fast refresh, hot reloading, and detailed error reporting.
  • Rich Ecosystem
    Benefiting from the rich ecosystem of the React community and integrating well with other libraries and tools.
  • Internationalization
    Built-in support for internationalization helps developers build multilingual applications with ease.
  • Community and Support
    Strong community and extensive documentation provide ample support and resources for new and experienced developers alike.

Possible disadvantages of Next.js

  • Learning Curve
    The robust feature set of Next.js can present a steep learning curve for developers who are new to React or server-side rendering concepts.
  • Configuration Overhead
    Although Next.js aims for simplicity, complex projects may still require significant configuration and customization.
  • Performance Overhead
    SSR can introduce additional server load and latency compared to static site generators, especially under high traffic conditions.
  • Deployment Complexity
    Deploying Next.js applications that leverage SSR or API routes may be more complex and could require more sophisticated server infrastructure.
  • Vendor Lock-In
    If heavily relying on Next.js-specific features, moving away from the framework to another solution could require significant refactoring.
  • Bundle Size
    Without careful optimization, client-side bundle sizes can become large, negatively affecting the application’s performance.
  • Build Times
    For large applications, build times can be significant, impacting the development cycle and deployment times.
  • Dependencies
    Next.js introduces its own set of dependencies and tooling, which might complicate version management and compatibility with other tools.

LT Browser by Lambdatest features and specs

  • Responsive Testing
    LT Browser allows users to test their websites on a variety of screen sizes and resolutions, ensuring that the site is responsive and performs well on all devices.
  • Pre-built Device Viewports
    The tool comes with a wide range of pre-built device viewports which can simulate different devices' screens, making it easier to perform cross-device testing.
  • Local Testing
    Users can perform local testing, allowing them to test and debug their websites in the development phase without having to deploy them.
  • Network Throttling
    LT Browser includes network throttling features that enable users to test their websites under different network conditions, such as 3G, 4G, and slower connections.
  • Collaborative Features
    The tool provides features for easy bug logging and sharing of test results with team members, fostering better collaboration.
  • Performance Reports
    Users receive detailed performance reports that help identify and rectify issues affecting the website's performance across different devices.
  • Integration with Popular Tools
    LT Browser integrates with a range of popular development tools such as Slack, JIRA, and Asana, streamlining workflows and improving productivity.

Possible disadvantages of LT Browser by Lambdatest

  • Subscription Cost
    LT Browser requires a subscription, which might be a consideration for small teams or individual developers who have budget constraints.
  • Learning Curve
    Though user-friendly, new users may face a slight learning curve in navigating and leveraging all the features effectively.
  • Limited Free Features
    The free version has limited features, potentially requiring users to upgrade to paid plans to access advanced functionalities.
  • Resource Intensive
    Running multiple devices and resolution tests simultaneously can be resource-intensive, possibly affecting the performance of less powerful systems.
  • No Offline Mode
    An active internet connection is required to use many of the features, meaning you cannot perform tests offline.

Next.js videos

Next.js: The React Framework - JS Monthly - July 2019

More videos:

  • Review - Gatsby vs Next.js: Which does SSG Better?

LT Browser by Lambdatest videos

No LT Browser by Lambdatest videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Next.js and LT Browser by Lambdatest)
Developer Tools
99 99%
1% 1
Browser Testing
0 0%
100% 100
Web Frameworks
100 100%
0% 0
Website Testing
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Next.js and LT Browser by Lambdatest. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Next.js and LT Browser by Lambdatest

Next.js Reviews

Top 10 Next.js Alternatives You Can Try
Next.js is a well-known platform most of you utilize to build a responsive website. However, if you are annoyed by its limited features, consider Next.js alternatives because flexibility and faster loading speed are always the top concerns of every developer. For this reason, you might need to read this article to explore the top 10 Nextjs Alternatives for the exciting world...
20 Next.js Alternatives Worth Considering
When it comes to building modern web applications, finding the right framework can be a game-changer. Next.js is often a top choice, but there are several Next.js alternatives worth considering.
10 Best Next.js Alternatives to Consider Today
For those who have been accustomed to the benefits of React Next.js, keeping an eye on the latest version is crucial. Next.js's continuous improvement and updates in Next.js enhance its capabilities, ensuring developers can access cutting-edge features and optimizations. Whether starting a new project or maintaining an existing Next.js website, staying informed about the...
9 Best JavaScript Frameworks to Use in 2023
Next.js uses JavaScript and React components to create the UI. Next.js is influenced by React Router, Webpack, Node ecosystem, and community libraries. The feature that sets Next.js apart from other frameworks is its ability to automatically generate pages based on the file system structure of the project. For example, if there is a _posts folder in the root directory,...
Source: ninetailed.io
JavaScript: What Are The Most Used Frameworks For This Language?
Some of its top features include server-side rendering, automatic code splitting, client-side routing, built-in CSS support, static site generation and API routes. Overall, Next.JS is a powerful and flexible framework that provides developers with a simple and intuitive way to build complex React applications with ease. It is widely used in the React community and has a...
Source: www.bocasay.com

LT Browser by Lambdatest Reviews

  1. Alick
    · Team Lead at Partnerize ·
    Our go to mobile testing tool

    LT Browser is the new defacto tool for responsive testing requirements. Being a ecommerce company with wide audience we need to stay on our toes to keep our users bouncing because of a UI bug. LT browser has been helping us for the past 3 months with testing on the latest mobile view ports. And my favorite feature is instant local testing by simply adding the URL and side by side comparison of two devices. And best part of the debugging is that we can see the changes being reflected in real time

    🏁 Competitors: BrowserStack, CrossBrowserTesting
    👍 Pros:    Latest devices resolution|Scroll sync with two devices|Intuitive interface|Integration with jira|Instant screenshot and bug reporting flow|Testing on various networks
    👎 Cons:    Cross browser testing is not possible|Missing the test analytics
  2. chris-hewins
    · QA Engineer at Toast Inc ·
    Helped us develop mobile websites faster

    As website designers our team loves the way we can show all the progress to our clients. It helped us have a better transparency in our work. We can just screengrab the viewport and easily share it with clients. And the best part is the interface, it's intuitive enough that none of us have ever looked at the support doc. Ability to test the local url path and Integration with JIRA saves a lot of time and makes it easier to communicate within the team. Kudos Team LT Browser..!!

    🏁 Competitors: Blisk Browser
    👍 Pros:    45+ viewports to choose from|Intuitive ui and viewport comparison feature for quick visualisation|Can make changes on the go with the help of inbuilt development tools|Mobile touch feature helps to test user experience in mobile viewports.
    👎 Cons:    Comparison is available for only 2 viewports, it forces users to select and deselect the devices repeatedly. a grid with more devices can be a better solution
  3. Alina-Novikava
    · Software QA Engineer at uTest ·
    Must have tool for web designers & developers

    Responsive testing can be a really daunting task. To ensure that all media queries are working properly for specific screen sizes is bound to be time consuming. However, LT browser has made the task comparatively easy for me and my team. It enabled us to test on multiple pre installed devices in no time. Plus, we can test over 2 devices at the same time in a side by side view.

    Our development team relies heavily over this tool since it offers hassle-free local testing experience, supports hot-reloading and offers developer tools to help us debug any UI bug on the go.

    Even our design team loves the LT browser due to its intuitiveness. They are always intrigued to check if the changes are rendering well and as per the design or not after every release cycle. With LT browser, they can do it easily without having to install anything or dealing with developer tools mobile-view debugging

    🏁 Competitors: Blisk
    👍 Pros:    You can integrate project management tools like jira|Simulate network bandwidth to test your website.|It offers two device views, which makes comparing easy by mirroring actions.|You get 30+ pre installed devices to test on and also make your own custom resolution device.
    👎 Cons:    Testing on an internet explorer using our custom device, there is no option!

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Next.js seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 1071 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Next.js mentions (1071)

  • Angular: Beyond the fog #1
    My only true recommendation would be to prefer React for mobile or SSR applications, as community projects (Expo for mobile and Next.js for SSR) are more mature and easier to set up. - Source: dev.to / 5 days ago
  • Generate Git action CI/CD pipeline using Amazon Q CLI
    This is a Next.js project bootstrapped with create-next-app. - Source: dev.to / 6 days ago
  • Build an Inventory Management System Using MongoDB Atlas
    We will walk you through the process of configuring and using MongoDB Atlas as your back end for your Next.js app, a powerful framework for building modern web applications with React. - Source: dev.to / 29 days ago
  • What I learned building my first AI Agent – Part 1
    After refining the user interface and doing some tests, I had a minimal functional AI agent capable of answering questions about Figma features . Since I was using Next.js, I decided to host my app on Vercel, since it was the platform that provided me the easiest and most intuitive way to do it. I was very happy with the result, even though the application was simple, in just a few days I managed to learn about... - Source: dev.to / 12 days ago
  • We Fell Out of Love with Next.js and Back in Love with Ruby on Rails
    3. Load personalized data (json) But usually step 1 and 2 are served from a cdn, so very fast. On subsequent requests, 1 and 2 are usually served from the browser cache, so extremely fast. SSR is usually not faster. Most often slower. You can check yourself in your browser dev tools (network tab): https://www.solidjs.com/ vs. https://nextjs.org/ So much complexity and effort in the nextjs app, but so much slower. - Source: Hacker News / 14 days ago
View more

LT Browser by Lambdatest mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of LT Browser by Lambdatest yet. Tracking of LT Browser by Lambdatest recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Next.js and LT Browser by Lambdatest, you can also consider the following products

Vercel - Vercel is the platform for frontend developers, providing the speed and reliability innovators need to create at the moment of inspiration.

browserling - Live interactive cross-browser testing from your browser.

React - A JavaScript library for building user interfaces

CrossBrowserTesting - Browser Testing made simple! Run automated, visual, and manual tests on 1500+ real browsers and mobile devices. Test more browsers, in less time.

Nuxt.js - Nuxt.js presets all the configuration needed to make your development of a Vue.js application enjoyable. It's a perfect static site generator.

BrowserStack - BrowserStack is a software testing platform for developers to comprehensively test websites and mobile applications for quality.