Based on our record, Next.js seems to be a lot more popular than LibreSpeed. While we know about 1071 links to Next.js, we've tracked only 33 mentions of LibreSpeed. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
My only true recommendation would be to prefer React for mobile or SSR applications, as community projects (Expo for mobile and Next.js for SSR) are more mature and easier to set up. - Source: dev.to / 6 days ago
This is a Next.js project bootstrapped with create-next-app. - Source: dev.to / 8 days ago
We will walk you through the process of configuring and using MongoDB Atlas as your back end for your Next.js app, a powerful framework for building modern web applications with React. - Source: dev.to / about 1 month ago
After refining the user interface and doing some tests, I had a minimal functional AI agent capable of answering questions about Figma features . Since I was using Next.js, I decided to host my app on Vercel, since it was the platform that provided me the easiest and most intuitive way to do it. I was very happy with the result, even though the application was simple, in just a few days I managed to learn about... - Source: dev.to / 13 days ago
3. Load personalized data (json) But usually step 1 and 2 are served from a cdn, so very fast. On subsequent requests, 1 and 2 are usually served from the browser cache, so extremely fast. SSR is usually not faster. Most often slower. You can check yourself in your browser dev tools (network tab): https://www.solidjs.com/ vs. https://nextjs.org/ So much complexity and effort in the nextjs app, but so much slower. - Source: Hacker News / 16 days ago
Try hosting a DIY speed test on a cloud server (like Google colab or the free oracle instances or whatever): https://github.com/librespeed/speedtest. - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago
It should be DIA. They provide the internet connection to the company since 2 decades and it's a very small ISP, so it's very vague in terms of contract. Iperf was giving me very terrible results with TCP, UDP was giving me a couple of Gbit/s throughput, definitely a wrong result. We are using this self hosted speedtest. All my results above are based on this software: Https://github.com/librespeed/speedtest. Source: about 2 years ago
Put a copy of Librespeed on a web server that's accessible through the VPN and told them to use that. For (our) convenience, it's logged into a database that's correlated with the VPN login/logout times so the users don't even need to log in to use it, but we still know whose test result it is. Source: about 2 years ago
There is a selfhosted solution for speed testing called LibreSpeed. You could try it and see the results. Source: over 2 years ago
In this particular instance though, adolfintel appears to be the developer of Librespeed. The official documentation in that GitHub repo points to that docker image by adolfintel. Therefore, it counts as the official docker image in my book. Source: over 2 years ago
Vercel - Vercel is the platform for frontend developers, providing the speed and reliability innovators need to create at the moment of inspiration.
Fast.com - Quickly test your internet speed with this fast-loading speed test powered by Netflix.
React - A JavaScript library for building user interfaces
SpeedOf.Me - SpeedOf.Me is an HTML5 Internet speed test. No Flash or Java needed!
Nuxt.js - Nuxt.js presets all the configuration needed to make your development of a Vue.js application enjoyable. It's a perfect static site generator.
Speedtest.net - Test your Internet connection bandwidth to locations around the world with this interactive broadband speed test from Ookla